· Public charity
San Diego Imperial Counties Developmental Services Foudation
Our mission is to generate and distribute funds to innovative programs that enhance the quality of life for individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities in san diego and imperial counties.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 20 grants below total $335,125 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $647,100 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $311,975 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k6 grants · $50k
- $10k–50k13 grants · $181k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $105k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| INCLUDE(ED) | $104,500 |
| HOME OF GUIDING HANDS | $21,400 |
| OCEANSIDE ART MUSEUM | $15,000 |
| CONNECTMED | $15,000 |
| PUENTA | $15,000 |
| VISTA HILL | $15,000 |
| FRED FINCH | $15,000 |
| CSUSM | $15,000 |
| UCSD NERODIVERSITY IN TECH CAMP | $15,000 |
| RADY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL | $13,586 |
| VILLA DE VIDA | $11,000 |
| ARC | $10,000 |
| GIRLS RISING | $10,000 |
| NOAH HOMES | $10,000 |
| HOPE ON THE HARD ROAD | $9,880 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $464k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 10% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +27% since the first grant, against +13% for the ones you funded once.
35 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2025, 28 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 54% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $155k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- NHNOAH HOMES INC5× · 2018–2025 · $138k · revenue +118%
- UCUnited Cerebral Palsy Association of San Diego County2× · 2017–2018 · $99k · revenue +3%
- OTOUTSIDE THE LENS4× · 2020–2023 · $95k · revenue +229%
Funded once
- SCSOUTHERN CALIFORNIA HOUSING COLLABORATIVEone grant, 2018 · $750k · revenue -8% · 56% of their budget
- BSBLISSFUL SEEDS INCone grant, 2023 · $75k · revenue +14% · 42% of their budget
- RCRADY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION SAN DIEGOone grant, 2018 · $62k · revenue -21%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Community support for Developmentally Disabled Adults, with a main emphasis on helping people to obtain and maintain real jobs in local businesses.
It is wrc's mission to support people with developmental disabilities, their families, and communities of choice by facilitating access to person-centered, culturally responsive services and resources.
To help people with developmental disabilities reach their highest potential and guide them through their special needs journey.
The mission of Marin Ventures is to serve adults with developmental disabilities by fostering independence, personal growth, and promoting the opportunity for community integration based upon individual need.Marin Ventures is an Adult…
SDC, Inc. is committed to providing personalized services, which promote the interest and respect the choices of each individual. Resources and other supports will be identified and utilized to effectively impact on developing, expanding…
Access to independence promotes full participation of people with disabilities, to help maintain, sustain, and maximize independence.
To improve the quality of life for people with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) and those who care for them.
To establish San Diego and Southern California as the core of the healthy living, sports and active lifestyle community. Through supporting companies at all stages, we help create jobs, but not just any jobs, jobs that make our city and…
The center provides advocacy, assessment, information, and coordinated services that support individuals with developmental disabilities and their families in making informed choices and leading self-directed lives.
To provide dignity, respect and choice for persons with developmental disabilities
Offering compassionate and convenient in-home respite care for disabled loved ones and supportive living solutions in north county san diego.
The center provides diagnostic evaluations, client coordination and lifelong planning of services for persons with developmental disabilities and their families in accordance with the lanterman developmental disabilities act.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is San Diego Center for Children and the most unlike its peers is San Diego Museum of Art. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 23 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 25% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 6% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
61 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 61 of the 75 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA HOUSING COLLABORATIVE ↗
- Who funds NOAH HOMES INC ↗
- Who funds IncludEd ↗
- Who funds United Cerebral Palsy Association of San Diego County ↗
- Who funds OUTSIDE THE LENS ↗
- Who funds BLISSFUL SEEDS INC ↗
- Who funds AUTISM SOCIETY SAN DIEGO INC ↗
- Who funds RADY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION SAN DIEGO ↗
- Who funds SPORTS FOR EXCEPTIONAL ATHLETES ↗
- Who funds SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION SDSU RESEARCH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PARTNERSHIPS WITH INDUSTRY ↗
- Who funds SPECIAL NEEDS RESOURCE FOUNDATION OF SAN DIEGO ↗
- Who funds Southwestern College Foundation ↗
- Who funds HOME OF GUIDING HANDS CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds National Foundation For Autism Research ↗
- Who funds MOUNTAIN SHADOWS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Developmental Services Continuum Inc ↗
- Who funds Resounding Joy Inc ↗
- Who funds BEST STEP FORWARD ↗
- Who funds FRED FINCH YOUTH CENTER ↗
- Who funds SAN DIEGO CENTER FOR CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds NEW VILLAGE ARTS INC ↗
- Who funds BANDING TOGETHER ↗
- Who funds Positive Action Community Theatre (PACT) ↗
- Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA INC ↗
- Who funds OPTIONS FOR ALL INC ↗
- Who funds ST VINCENT DE PAUL VILLAGE INC ↗
- Who funds St Madeleine Sophies Center Inc ↗
- Who funds ARC - IMPERIAL VALLEY ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF OCEANSIDE INC ↗
- Who funds SAN DIEGO CHILDREN'S DISCOVERY MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds SAN DIEGO CHILL ↗
- Who funds AUTISM TREE PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds UNSCRIPTED LEARNING ↗
- Who funds Arms Wide Open Corporation ↗
- Who funds UC SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The San Diego Foundation · The Conrad Prebys Foundation · Sempra Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of San Diego · Price Philanthropies Foundation · David C Copley Foundation · Boys and Girls Aid Society of San Diego Ltd · The Cushman Foundation · The Nordson Corporation Foundation · Walter J & Betty C Zable Foundation · Rancho Santa Fe Foundation · Art Pratt Foundation of Old Mission Rc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization San Diego Imperial Counties Developmental Services Foudation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.