Skip to content

· Private foundation

Samuel Weiss Family Charitable the Swf Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$3k
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$1k
Largest
01What it funds
0190% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$129kHealth$78kFood & Nutrition$73kCommunity Improvement$14kHuman Services$9kEducation$2kHousing & Shelter$450Other$0
02FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$450
Median grant
2
States reached
$74k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CT COUNCIL OF POETS LAUREATE$1,000
GEORGE FLYNN CLASSICAL CONCERTS$1,000
THE TOWERS FOUNDATION$450
Individual grant recipient$250
THE ARC OF RENSSELAER COUNTY$250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $250) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%THE ARC OF RENSSELAER COUNTY: $250 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$383k · 12 repeat orgs$12k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +64% since the first grant, against -10% for those funded once.

12 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
5

Total granted

$383k
$10k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+64%
-10%

Still filing today

42%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 34% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CI
    CazCares Inc
    7× · 2017–2023 · $73k · revenue +97%
  • MA
    Musical Associates of Central New York
    6× · 2018–2023 · $17k · revenue +32%
  • SQ
    STONE QUARRY HILL ART PARK INC
    4× · 2020–2023 · $7k · revenue +70%

Funded once

  • EO
    EARLVILLE OPERA HOUSE INC
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue -10%
  • CM
    CLARK MEMORIAL LIBRARY
    one grant, 2018 · $2k
  • OT
    OPERA THEATER OF CONNECTICUT INC
    one grant, 2022 · $2k · revenue -42%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Fine Arts Radio Inc

Fine Arts Radio, Inc. is a 501(c)(3) non-profit dedicated to supporting classical and classic music in Connecticut and New York

—
2
Southeastern Connecticut Community Orchestra Inc
Arts & Culture
3
Cny Arts Inc

CNY Arts' mission is to promote, support, and celebrate arts and culture in Central New York.

Arts & Culture
4
Nassau County Museum of Art

The Museum's mission is to encourage and promote the appreciation of fine art to people in its surrounding communities and beyond. The Museum is dedicated to fostering a deeper understanding of the arts, with particular emphasis on the…

Arts & Culture
5
Salt Marsh Opera Company

To stage the finest professional opera productions in Southeastern New England. To excite and build audiences for the enjoyment of a grand art form. To offer educational programs and creative community outreach events that expand the opera…

Arts & Culture
6
Schenectady Light Opera Company Inc

The schenectady light opera company, inc.'s (sloc) purpose is to develop an appreciation of the musical arts in the local community by promoting and producing musical productions.

Arts & Culture
7
Bronx Arts Ensemble Inc

To further art education and appreciation.

Arts & Culture
8
Binghamton Philharmonic Inc

The mission of the Binghamton Philharmonic is building community through the power of live music.

Arts & Culture
9
Saratoga Arts Inc

Saratoga arts was established to enrich the region by cultivating a vibrant arts community and by ensuring that the arts are accessible to all.

Arts & Culture
10
The Eastern Connecticut Symphony Orchestra Incorporated

The mission of the eastern connecticut symphony, inc. is to inspire, educate and connect our communities through live orchestral music.

Arts & Culture
11
American Chamber Ensemble Inc

The American Chamber Ensemble is a consortium of distinguished musicians whose concerts explore the music for piano with strings, woodwinds and/or voice, presenting both great standard repertoire and living American composers.

—
12
White Plains Performing Arts Center

Productions

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Musical Associates of Central New York; the most unlike its peers is George Flynn Classical Concerts Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
5/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $88,675 · OtherIndividual grant recipientPLANNED PARENTHOOD: $77,500 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOODCazCares Inc: $72,500 · OtherCazCares IncMUNSON WILLIAMS PRCOTOR MUSEUM: $23,500 · OtherMUNSON WILLIAMS PRCOTOR MUSEUMEVERSON MUSEUM OF ART: $22,500 · OtherEVERSON MUSEUM OF ARTSYRACUSE STAGE: $19,000 · OtherSYRACUSE STAGECOMMUNITY OF MIDDLESEX COUNTY: $14,250 · Other+8 more: $18,810 · Other+8 moreGeorge Flynn Classical Concerts Inc: $26,000 · Arts & CultureGeorge Flynn Cla…Musical Associates of Central New York: $17,000 · Arts & CultureMusical Associat…STONE QUARRY HILL ART PARK INC: $7,250 · Arts & CultureSTONE QUARRY HIL…Mystic Museum of Art Inc: $6,000 · Arts & CultureMystic Museum of…+1 more: $1,500 · Arts & CultureNYSARC INC RENSSELAER COUNTY CHAPTER: $250 · Human Services
Other$336,735Arts & Culture$57,750Human Services$250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCazCares Inc: $72,500 over 7y, 6.9% of budgetGeorge Flynn Classical Concerts Inc: $26,000 over 4y, 5.4% of budgetMusical Associates of Central New York: $17,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetSTONE QUARRY HILL ART PARK INC: $7,250 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetMystic Museum of Art Inc: $6,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetEARLVILLE OPERA HOUSE INC: $4,500 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetOPERA THEATER OF CONNECTICUT INC: $1,500 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetTHE TOWERS FOUNDATION INC: $450 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNYSARC INC RENSSELAER COUNTY CHAPTER: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CazCares Inc ↗
  • Who funds George Flynn Classical Concerts Inc ↗
  • Who funds Musical Associates of Central New York ↗
  • Who funds STONE QUARRY HILL ART PARK INC ↗
  • Who funds Mystic Museum of Art Inc ↗
  • Who funds EARLVILLE OPERA HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds OPERA THEATER OF CONNECTICUT INC ↗
  • Who funds THE TOWERS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds NYSARC INC RENSSELAER COUNTY CHAPTER ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Central New York Community Foundation IncNY13.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Central New York Community Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Samuel Weiss Family Charitable the Swf Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Samuel Weiss Family Charitable the Swf Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    4get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Samuel Weiss Family Charitable the Swf’s filings →

    More from the funding graph