Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Samuel Weiss Family Charitable the Swf Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$3k
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$1k
Largest
01What you fund
0190% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Arts & Culture$129kHealth$78kFood & Nutrition$73kCommunity Improvement$14kHuman Services$9kEducation$2kHousing & Shelter$450Other$0
02FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$450
Median grant
2
States reached
$74k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GEORGE FLYNN CLASSICAL CONCERTS$1,000
CT COUNCIL OF POETS LAUREATE$1,000
THE TOWERS FOUNDATION$450
Individual grant recipient$250
THE ARC OF RENSSELAER COUNTY$250
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY24–24, $250) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%THE ARC OF RENSSELAER COUNTY: $250 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$383k · 12 repeat orgs$12k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +67% since the first grant, against -10% for the ones you funded once.

12 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
5

Total granted

$383k
$10k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+67%
-10%

Still filing today

42%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 34% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CI
    CazCares Inc
    7× · 2017–2023 · $73k · revenue +97%
  • MA
    Musical Associates of Central New York
    6× · 2018–2023 · $17k · revenue +32%
  • SQ
    STONE QUARRY HILL ART PARK INC
    4× · 2020–2023 · $7k · revenue +70%

Funded once

  • EO
    EARLVILLE OPERA HOUSE INC
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue -10%
  • CM
    CLARK MEMORIAL LIBRARY
    one grant, 2018 · $2k
  • OT
    OPERA THEATER OF CONNECTICUT INC
    one grant, 2022 · $2k · revenue -42%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Fine Arts Radio Inc

Fine Arts Radio, Inc. is a 501(c)(3) non-profit dedicated to supporting classical and classic music in Connecticut and New York

2
Southeastern Connecticut Community Orchestra Inc
Arts & Culture
3
Cny Arts Inc

CNY Arts' mission is to promote, support, and celebrate arts and culture in Central New York.

Arts & Culture
4
Nassau County Museum of Art

The Museum's mission is to encourage and promote the appreciation of fine art to people in its surrounding communities and beyond. The Museum is dedicated to fostering a deeper understanding of the arts, with particular emphasis on the…

Arts & Culture
5
Salt Marsh Opera Company

To stage the finest professional opera productions in Southeastern New England. To excite and build audiences for the enjoyment of a grand art form. To offer educational programs and creative community outreach events that expand the opera…

Arts & Culture
6
Schenectady Light Opera Company Inc

The schenectady light opera company, inc.'s (sloc) purpose is to develop an appreciation of the musical arts in the local community by promoting and producing musical productions.

Arts & Culture
7
Bronx Arts Ensemble Inc

To further art education and appreciation.

Arts & Culture
8
Binghamton Philharmonic Inc

The mission of the Binghamton Philharmonic is building community through the power of live music.

Arts & Culture
9
Saratoga Arts Inc

Saratoga arts was established to enrich the region by cultivating a vibrant arts community and by ensuring that the arts are accessible to all.

Arts & Culture
10
The Eastern Connecticut Symphony Orchestra Incorporated

The mission of the eastern connecticut symphony, inc. is to inspire, educate and connect our communities through live orchestral music.

Arts & Culture
11
American Chamber Ensemble Inc

The American Chamber Ensemble is a consortium of distinguished musicians whose concerts explore the music for piano with strings, woodwinds and/or voice, presenting both great standard repertoire and living American composers.

12
White Plains Performing Arts Center

Productions

Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Musical Associates of Central New York and the most unlike its peers is George Flynn Classical Concerts Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
5/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Individual grant recipient — $88,675 · OtherIndividual grant recipientPLANNED PARENTHOOD — $77,500 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOODCazCares Inc — $72,500 · OtherCazCares IncMUNSON WILLIAMS PRCOTOR MUSEUM — $23,500 · OtherMUNSON WILLIAMS PRCOTOR MUSEUMEVERSON MUSEUM OF ART — $22,500 · OtherEVERSON MUSEUM OF ARTSYRACUSE STAGE — $19,000 · OtherSYRACUSE STAGECOMMUNITY OF MIDDLESEX COUNTY — $14,250 · Other+8 more — $18,810 · Other+8 moreGeorge Flynn Classical Concerts Inc — $26,000 · Arts & CultureGeorge Flynn Cla…Musical Associates of Central New York — $17,000 · Arts & CultureMusical Associat…STONE QUARRY HILL ART PARK INC — $7,250 · Arts & CultureSTONE QUARRY HIL…Mystic Museum of Art Inc — $6,000 · Arts & CultureMystic Museum of…+1 more — $1,500 · Arts & CultureNYSARC INC RENSSELAER COUNTY CHAPTER — $250 · Human Services
Other$336,735Arts & Culture$57,750Human Services$250

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCazCares Inc — $72,500 over 7y, 6.9% of budgetGeorge Flynn Classical Concerts Inc — $26,000 over 4y, 5.4% of budgetMusical Associates of Central New York — $17,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetSTONE QUARRY HILL ART PARK INC — $7,250 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetMystic Museum of Art Inc — $6,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetEARLVILLE OPERA HOUSE INC — $4,500 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetOPERA THEATER OF CONNECTICUT INC — $1,500 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetTHE TOWERS FOUNDATION INC — $450 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNYSARC INC RENSSELAER COUNTY CHAPTER — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CazCares Inc
  • Who funds George Flynn Classical Concerts Inc
  • Who funds Musical Associates of Central New York
  • Who funds STONE QUARRY HILL ART PARK INC
  • Who funds Mystic Museum of Art Inc
  • Who funds EARLVILLE OPERA HOUSE INC
  • Who funds OPERA THEATER OF CONNECTICUT INC
  • Who funds THE TOWERS FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds NYSARC INC RENSSELAER COUNTY CHAPTER

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Central New York Community Foundation IncNY13.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Central New York Community Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Samuel Weiss Family Charitable the Swf Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 40%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    4get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph