Skip to content

· Private foundation

Samuel P Sutton 31s046008

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$20k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Education$147kMembership Benefit$9kHealth$3k
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$3,333
Median grant
3
States reached
$443k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FRUITLAND BIBLE COLLEGE$3,333
LEE ACADEMY$3,333
University of South Carolina$3,333
CENTRAL CAROLINA TECH COLLEGE$3,333
CLEMSON UNIVERSITY$3,333
COLLEGE OF CHARLESTON$1,333
MIDLANDS TECHNICAL COLLEGE$667
Lincoln Memorial University$667
PRESBYTERIAN COLLEGE$667
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 93% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%GRAND CANYON UNIVERSITY: $3k → 11%THE MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA: $2k → 12%CENTRAL CAROLINA TECH COLLEGE: $4k → 14%CLEMSON UNIVERSITY: $3k → 16%University of South Carolina: $4k → 16%ERSKINE COLLEGE: $4k → 17%PRESBYTERIAN COLLEGE: $4k → 18%FLORENCE DARLINGTON TECHNICAL: $4k → 20%BISHOPVILLE MASONIC LODGE CO TIMOTHY DUBOSE: $41k → 28%Lincoln Memorial University: $785 → 20%FRUITLAND BIBLE COLLEGE: $3k → 12%UNIVERSAL ACCOUNTING: $4k → 8%LIBERTY UNIVERSITY: $6k → 20%MONTGOMERY COLLEGE: $785 → 8%GRAND CANYON UNIVERSITY: $1k → 11%THE MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA: $786 → 12%CENTRAL CAROLINA TECH COLLEGE: $3k → 14%CLEMSON UNIVERSITY: $2k → 16%University of South Carolina: $3k → 16%PRESBYTERIAN COLLEGE: $4k → 18%ROBERT E LEE ACADEMY: $4k → 28%Lincoln Memorial University: $667 → 20%UNIVERSAL ACCOUNTING: $3k → 8%LIBERTY UNIVERSITY: $4k → 20%THE MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA: $357 → 12%CLEMSON UNIVERSITY: $1k → 16%University of South Carolina: $2k → 16%PRESBYTERIAN COLLEGE: $2k → 18%ROBERT E LEE ACADEMY: $4k → 28%Lincoln Memorial University: $500 → 20%UNIVERSAL ACCOUNTING: $2k → 8%CHARLESTON SOUTHERN UNIVERSITY: $4k → 12%CLEMSON UNIVERSITY: $1k → 16%University of South Carolina: $1k → 16%PRESBYTERIAN COLLEGE: $667 → 18%LEE ACADEMY: $3k → 28%Lincoln Memorial University: $357 → 20%CHARLESTON SOUTHERN UNIVERSITY: $4k → 12%LEE ACADEMY: $3k → 28%CHARLESTON SOUTHERN UNIVERSITY: $3k → 12%LEE ACADEMY: $3k → 28%COLLEGE OF CHARLESTON: $3k → 12%COLLEGE OF CHARLESTON: $2k → 12%COLLEGE OF CHARLESTON: $2k → 12%COLLEGE OF CHARLESTON: $1k → 12%COLLEGE OF CHARLESTON: $714 → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

67%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$106k · 14 repeat orgs$53k to everyone else

14 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
4

Total granted

$106k
$49k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+23%
+46%

Still filing today

43%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CS
    CHARLESTON SOUTHERN UNIVERSITY
    3× · 2021–2023 · $11k · revenue +23%
  • LU
    LIBERTY UNIVERSITY INC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $10k · revenue +22%
  • LA
    LEE ACADEMY OF BISHOPVILLE INC
    2× · 2021–2022 · $8k · revenue +30%

Funded once

  • BM
    BISHOPVILLE MASONIC LODGE CO TIMOTHY DUBOSE
    one grant, 2020 · $41k
  • FT
    FLORENCE-DARLINGTON TECHNICAL COLLEGE EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $4k · revenue +46%
  • EC
    Erskine College and Theological Seminary
    one grant, 2021 · $4k · revenue +9%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Dickinson College

Dickinson college provides a useful, innovative and interdisciplinary education in the liberal arts and sciences to prepare students to lead rich and fulfilling lives of engaged global citizenship

Education
2
Lewis & Clark College

Lewis & clark is a premier private higher education institution offering an exceptional education in an inclusive environment. by fostering critical thinking, innovation, creativity, civic engagement, and leadership, both inside and…

Education
3
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
4
Florida Southern College

Florida southern college (florida southern or the college) is committed to educational excellence and is a selective comprehensive, private, united methodist affiliated college with a strong liberal arts core and signature programs. (see…

Education
5
LaGrange College

Education - lagrange college challenges the minds and inspires the souls of its students. founded in 1831 and committed to its relationship with the united methodist church and its wesleyan and liberal arts traditions, the college supports…

Education
6
Anderson University

The university is a comprehensive university affiliated with the south carolina baptist convention offering bachelors, masters, and doctorate degrees. located on approximately 398 acres in the upstate region of south carolina near the…

Education
7
Coker University

Coker university is a student-centered, comprehensive university. it is dedicated to providing every student an academic curriculum based upon a uniformly excellent liberal arts core that enhances the structured development of key personal…

Education
8
Greensboro College

Greensboro College provides a liberal arts education grounded in the traditions of the United Methodist Church and fosters the intellectual, social, and spiritual development of all students while supporting their individual needs.

Education
9
Mcdaniel College Inc

Mcdaniel college is a diverse student-centered community committed to excellence in the liberal arts & sciences and professional studies with careful mentoring and attention to the individual. mcdaniel changes lives. we challenge students…

Education
10
Greenville College

Greenville college d/b/a greenville university empowers students for lives of character and service through a transforming christ-centered education in the liberal arts, sciences, and professional studies.

Education
11
University of Lynchburg

The mission of the University is to inspire independent thinkers who become trustworthy, effective leaders that shape caring communities. The vision of the University of Lynchburg is to cultivate a world that is innovative, authentic, and…

Education
12
Albright College

As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Presbyterian College; the most unlike its peers is Lincoln Memorial University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
7/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BISHOPVILLE MASONIC LODGE CO TIMOTHY DUBOSE: $40,706 · OtherBISHOPVILLE MASONIC LODGE CO TIMOTHY DUBOSEUniversity of South Carolina: $10,281 · OtherUniversity of South CarolinaLEE ACADEMY: $9,328 · OtherLEE ACADEMYUNIVERSAL ACCOUNTING: $9,313 · OtherUNIVERSAL ACCOUNTINGCOLLEGE OF CHARLESTON: $8,710 · OtherCOLLEGE OF CHARLESTONLEE ACADEMY OF BISHOPVILLE INC: $7,825 · OtherLEE ACADEMY OF BISHOPVILLE INCCLEMSON UNIVERSITY: $7,623 · OtherCLEMSON UNIVERSITYCENTRAL CAROLINA TECH COLLEGE: $7,208 · OtherCENTRAL CAROLINA TECH COLLEGEAppalachian State University: $4,567 · Other+4 more: $7,653 · Other+4 moreCHARLESTON SOUTHERN UNIVERSITY: $10,963 · EducationCHARLESTON SOUTHERN UNIVE…LIBERTY UNIVERSITY INC: $10,226 · EducationLIBERTY UNIVERSITY INCGrand Canyon University: $4,567 · EducationGrand Canyon UniversityFLORENCE-DARLINGTON TECHNICAL COLLEGE EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $3,875 · EducationFLORENCE-DARLINGTON TECHN…Erskine College and Theological Seminary: $3,875 · EducationErskine College and Theol…LINCOLN MEMORIAL UNIVERSITY: $2,309 · EducationLINCOLN MEMORIAL UNIVERSI…PRESBYTERIAN COLLEGE: $10,061 · Housing & Shelter
Other$113,214Education$35,815Housing & Shelter$10,061

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCHARLESTON SOUTHERN UNIVERSITY: $10,963 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLIBERTY UNIVERSITY INC: $10,226 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPRESBYTERIAN COLLEGE: $10,061 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetLEE ACADEMY OF BISHOPVILLE INC: $7,825 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetGrand Canyon University: $4,567 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFLORENCE-DARLINGTON TECHNICAL COLLEGE EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $3,875 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetErskine College and Theological Seminary: $3,875 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLINCOLN MEMORIAL UNIVERSITY: $2,309 over 4y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CHARLESTON SOUTHERN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds LIBERTY UNIVERSITY INC ↗
  • Who funds PRESBYTERIAN COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds LEE ACADEMY OF BISHOPVILLE INC ↗
  • Who funds Grand Canyon University ↗
  • Who funds FLORENCE-DARLINGTON TECHNICAL COLLEGE EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Erskine College and Theological Seminary ↗
  • Who funds LINCOLN MEMORIAL UNIVERSITY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA3.2× affinity5 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Samuel P Sutton 31s046008 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Samuel P Sutton 31s046008. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Samuel P Sutton 31s046008’s filings →

    More from the funding graph