Skip to content

· Private foundation

Samourkas Foundation of New York

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$270k
Granted FY2025still arriving
2
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$260k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

96% of Samourkas Foundation of New York’s FY2025 grant dollars went to King Baudouin Foundation Us Inc, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 1 organization directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it.

Organizations named directly on the return

1
’17
4
’18
6
’19
0
’20
1
’21
4
’22
2
’23
1
’24
1
’25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

International$1.7MHealth$301kReligion$101kArts & Culture$86kPublic Safety & Disaster$80kEducation$46kAnimals$37kFood & Nutrition$15kOther$0
02FY2025 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
  • $250k+1 grant · $260k
$260,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$4.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MYRIAD USA$260,000
FOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 99% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%AMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR ROYAL HOLLO: $11k → 10%DAVID SHELDRICK WILDLIFE TRUST: $5k → 10%SCULPTURE CENTER INC: $10k → 13%JEFFERSON MARKET GARDEN: $5k → 17%FOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY: $10k → 28%HEIFER INTERNATIONAL: $5k → 17%WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN: $40k → 14%HOMES FOR THE BRAVE: $1k → 9%SEATTLE HUMANE SOCIETY: $5k → 9%THE ARCHAELOGICAL SOCIETY FOUNDATN: $12k → 11%SCULPTURE CENTER INC: $10k → 13%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF NATL GALLER: $12k → 17%WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN: $40k → 14%APPLIED BEHAVIORAL REHAB INSTITUTE: $1k → 9%AMERICAN SCHOOL OF CLASSICAL STUDIE: $10k → 11%SCULPTURE CENTER: $10k → 13%FJC-HELLENIC HOPE FUND: $40k → 17%YMCA OF GREENWICH: $5k → 9%AMERICAN SCHOOL OF CLASSICAL STUDIE: $10k → 11%SCULPTURE CENTER INC: $10k → 13%CANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $20k → 17%AMERICAN SCHOOL OF CLASSICAL STUDYS: $10k → 11%SCULPTURE CENTER INC: $10k → 13%CYCLADIC ART FOUNDATION: $2k → 17%AMERICAN SCHOOL OF CLASSICAL STUDIE: $10k → 11%SCULPTURE CENTER: $5k → 13%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE ALMEIDA THE: $2k → 17%SCULPTURE CENTER: $5k → 13%CYCLADIC ART FOUNDATION: $2k → 17%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF ALMEIDA THEATER: $2k → 17%KING BAUDOUIN FOUNDATION US: $231k → 17%KING BAUDOUIN FOUNDATION US: $200k → 17%KING BAUDOUIN FOUNDATION US: $200k → 17%KING BAUDOUIN FOUNDATION US: $50k → 17%KING BAUDOUIN FOUNDATION US: $35k → 17%KING BAUDOUIN FOUNDATION US: $34k → 17%KING BAUDOUIN FOUNDATION US: $5k → 17%MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CEN: $150k → 17%MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CEN: $100k → 17%PROMISE PROJECT: $5k → 17%BRAIN AND BEHAVIOR RESEARCH FOUND: $20k → 17%PROMISE PROJECT: $5k → 17%FRESH AIR FUND: $5k → 17%AMERICAN FRIENDS LALAOUNIS MUSEUM: $15k → 17%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF ILIAS LALAOUNIS: $20k → 17%AMERICAN FARM SCHOOL: $10k → 17%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF ILIAS LALAOUNIS: $5k → 17%AMERICAN FARM SCHOOL: $1k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
NY
NJ
CT
CA
DE
AR
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 19% of Samourkas Foundation of New York’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Samourkas Foundation of New Yorklessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 8.2% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

55%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$470k · 8 repeat orgs$383k to everyone else

8 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
26

Total granted

$470k
$373k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+17%
+56%

Still filing today

50%
19%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalAnimalsHealthArts & CultureRecreation & SportsPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TS
    THE SCULPTURE CENTER INC
    6× · 2018–2024 · $60k · revenue +14%
  • TA
    THESSALONICA AGRICULTURAL & INDUSTRIAL INSTITUTE (THE AMERICAN FARM SCHOOL)
    2× · 2018–2022 · $11k · revenue +17%
  • CA
    CYCLADIC ART FOUNDATION CO FORVIS MAZARS LLP
    2× · 2019–2022 · $4k · revenue +153%

Funded once

  • RG
    RELOAD GREECE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2018 · $69k
  • TF
    THEOTOKOS FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $60k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $43k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
2
The Water Research Foundation

The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…

Environment
3
New York School of Interior Design

New york school of interior design provides the most innovative, immersive, and transformative interior design education in the world, demonstrating the impact of professionally designed interiors on the health, happiness, and well-being…

Education
4
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
5
Foundation for Food and Agriculture Research

Foundation for food and agriculture research connects funders, researchers and farmers through public-private partnerships to support audacious research addressing the biggest food and agriculture challenges.

Food & Nutrition
6
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
7
Food & Water Watch

Food & water watch conducts extensive research and public education to ensure the food and water we consume is safe, accessible and sustainably produced. so we can all enjoy and trust in what we eat and drink, we help people take charge of…

Food & Nutrition
8
American Culinary Federation Education Foundation Inc

To provide for education, scholarships and other charitable purposes related to the culinary profession

—
9
Internet Society Foundation

At the internet society foundation, we focus on funding initiatives that strengthen the internet in function and reach so that it can effectively serve all people. our work advances the vision of the internet society (isoc): the internet…

International
10
Environmental Investigation Agency

To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.

International
11
American Foreign Service Association

American foreign service association (afsa) is both the principal advocate for the long-term institutional wellbeing of the professional career foreign service and responsible for safeguarding the interest of afsa members. (continued on…

—
12
World Resources Institute

Wri is committed to creating change that improves people's lives and ensures the natural world can thrive. (see schedule o)wri's bold vision requires a formula for success we call "count it. change it. scale it.":- count it: our work is…

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fresh Air Fund; the most unlike its peers is Cycladic Art Foundation Co Forvis Mazars Llp. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
8/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MYRIAD USA INC: $1,565,756 · InternationalMYRIAD USA INCWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $80,000 · International+1 more: $11,000 · InternationalMEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CEN: $250,000 · OtherMEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCE…RELOAD GREECE FOUNDATION: $69,000 · OtherRELOAD GREECE FOUNDATIONTHEOTOKOS FOUNDATION: $60,000 · OtherTHEOTOKOS FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient: $42,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientFJC-HELLENIC HOPE FUND: $40,000 · OtherFJC-HELLENIC HOPE FUNDAMERICAN SCHOOL OF CLASSICAL STUDIE: $30,000 · OtherAMERICAN FRIENDS OF ILIAS LALAOUNIS: $25,000 · Other+18 more: $135,993 · Other+18 moreTHE SCULPTURE CENTER INC: $60,000 · Arts & CultureCANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC: $20,000 · HealthAPPLIED BEHAVIORAL REHABILITATION INSTIT: $1,000 · HealthFOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY: $10,000 · Community ImprovementTHE DAVID SHELDRICK WILDLIFE TRUST USA INC: $5,000 · AnimalsTHE HUMANE SOCIETY FOR SEATTLEKING COUNTY: $5,000 · AnimalsFRESH AIR FUND: $5,000 · Recreation & SportsCYCLADIC ART FOUNDATION CO FORVIS MAZARS LLP: $4,319 · Philanthropy
International$1,656,756Other$652,493Arts & Culture$60,000Health$21,000Community Improvement$10,000Animals$10,000Recreation & Sports$5,000Philanthropy$4,319

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMYRIAD USA INC: $1,565,756 over 9y, 0.8% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $80,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SCULPTURE CENTER INC: $60,000 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetCANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHESSALONICA AGRICULTURAL & INDUSTRIAL INSTITUTE (THE AMERICAN FARM SCHOOL): $11,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRESH AIR FUND: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE DAVID SHELDRICK WILDLIFE TRUST USA INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE HUMANE SOCIETY FOR SEATTLEKING COUNTY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCYCLADIC ART FOUNDATION CO FORVIS MAZARS LLP: $4,319 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetAPPLIED BEHAVIORAL REHABILITATION INSTIT: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MYRIAD USA INC ↗
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds THE SCULPTURE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds CANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds THESSALONICA AGRICULTURAL & INDUSTRIAL INSTITUTE (THE AMERICAN FARM SCHOOL) ↗
  • Who funds FOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY ↗
  • Who funds FRESH AIR FUND ↗
  • Who funds THE DAVID SHELDRICK WILDLIFE TRUST USA INC ↗
  • Who funds THE HUMANE SOCIETY FOR SEATTLEKING COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds CYCLADIC ART FOUNDATION CO FORVIS MAZARS LLP ↗
  • Who funds APPLIED BEHAVIORAL REHABILITATION INSTIT ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropic TrustPA11.3× affinity5 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Samourkas Foundation of New York funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Samourkas Foundation of New York. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 35%
  • Applied Behavioral Rehabilitation Instit: 35% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 36 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Samourkas Foundation of New York’s filings →

More from the funding graph