Skip to content

· Private foundation

Sam & Ada Petro Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$4k
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$2k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$58kHealth$12kEducation$12kInternational$1kReligion$500
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,082
Median grant
1
States reached
$112k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HOUSTON METHODIST HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$1,500
MD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER$1,082
ALZHEMIER'S ASSOCIATION$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $33k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%LIVING WATER INTERNATIONAL: $50 → 8%BOYS & GIRLS COUNTRY OF HOUSTON: $9k → 16%BOYS & GIRLS COUNTRY OF HOUSTON: $5k → 16%BOYS & GIRLS COUNTRY OF HOUSTON: $5k → 16%BOYS & GIRLS COUNTRY OF HOUSTON: $4k → 16%BOYS & GIRLS COUNTRY OF HOUSTON: $3k → 16%BOYS & GIRLS COUNTRY OF HOUSTON: $2k → 16%BOYS & GIRLS COUNTRY OF HOUSTON: $2k → 16%NORTHWEST ASSISTANCE MINISTRIES: $2k → 16%NORTHWEST ASSISTANCE MINISTRIES: $2k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$78k · 8 repeat orgs$5k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +21% since the first grant, against +19% for those funded once.

8 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
6

Total granted

$78k
$5k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+21%
+19%

Still filing today

50%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationHealthInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BA
    BOYS AND GIRLS COUNTRY OF HOUSTON INC
    7× · 2017–2024 · $29k · revenue +21%
  • FO
    FOCUS ON THE FAMILY
    2× · 2022–2023 · $25k
  • NC
    NORTHLAND CHRISTIAN SCHOOL
    3× · 2017–2020 · $10k · revenue -24%

Funded once

  • CU
    CONCORDIA UNIVERSITY TEXAS
    one grant, 2017 · $2k · revenue -24%
  • LS
    LONE STAR CIRCLE OF CARE
    one grant, 2023 · $2k · revenue -12%
  • GS
    GUATEMALA SANA CHILDREN'S PROJECT INC
    one grant, 2018 · $1k · revenue +19%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Healing Hands Ministries Inc

Hmm health provides quality healthcare to all its neighbors with love, compassion, and respect.

Health
2
Houston Christian University

The mission of houston christian university is to provide a learning experience that instills in students a passion for academic, spiritual, and professional excellence as a result of our central confession, "jesus christ is lord."

—
3
Scott & White Hospital-College Station

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health
4
Baylor Scott & White Holdings

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health
5
Central Texas Christian School Inc

To educate students with the transforming truth of christ, inspiring academic excellence, godly character, and integrity in life pursuits.

—
6
Harris County Medical Society

Our mission is to be the leading advocate for our member physicians, their patients and our community, in promoting the highest standards of ethical medical practice, access to quality medical care, medical education, research, and…

—
7
Hill Country Montessori School Inc

Provide quality education for students from pre school through middle school using the Montessori method of learning and teaching.

Education
8
Northwestern Health Sciences University

Northwestern health sciences university prepares and serves the next generation of professionals and leaders to become vital contributors to the delivery and advancement of health care. our mission is accomplished through educational…

Education
9
Lutheran Education Association of Houston

The mission of the Lutheran Education Association of Houston (LEAH) is to operate and champion exemplary Lutheran schools in the Houston area to expand Christ's Kingdom.

—
10
Family Service Center of Houston and Harris County

The mission of Family Service Center of Houston and Harris County (Family Houston) is to create a stronger community for tomorrow by helping individuals and families meet the challenges they face today. We help others help themselves.

Human Services
11
Midwives College of Utah

Educate and train midwives to provide safe, professional, affordable and personal maternity and general health care.

Education
12
North Texas Area Community Health Center

Provide a community medical home through accessible, compassionate, and quality healthcare services in a community-based environment, maximizing the use of public and private resources to aid ntachc patients to obtain, regain, and maintain…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Concordia University Texas; the most unlike its peers is Living Water International. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
4/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BOYS AND GIRLS COUNTRY OF HOUSTON INC: $29,250 · Human ServicesBOYS AND GIRLS COUNTRY OF HOUSTON INCNORTHWEST ASSISTANCE MINISTRIES: $3,900 · Human ServicesNORTHWEST ASSISTANCE MINISTRIES+1 more: $50 · Human ServicesFOCUS ON THE FAMILY: $25,000 · OtherFOCUS ON THE FAMILYMD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER: $2,432 · OtherMD ANDERSON CANCER CENTERALZHEMIER'S ASSOCIATION: $2,112 · OtherALZHEMIER'S ASSOCIATIONIndividual grant recipient: $2,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient+2 more: $750 · OtherNORTHLAND CHRISTIAN SCHOOL: $9,500 · EducationNORTHLAND CHRIS…CONCORDIA UNIVERSITY TEXAS: $2,000 · EducationCONCORDIA UNIVE…THE METHODIST HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $3,500 · HealthLONE STAR CIRCLE OF CARE: $1,500 · HealthGUATEMALA SANA CHILDREN'S PROJECT INC: $1,000 · International
Human Services$33,200Other$32,294Education$11,500Health$5,000International$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBOYS AND GIRLS COUNTRY OF HOUSTON INC: $29,250 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetNORTHLAND CHRISTIAN SCHOOL: $9,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetNORTHWEST ASSISTANCE MINISTRIES: $3,900 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE METHODIST HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $3,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCONCORDIA UNIVERSITY TEXAS: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLONE STAR CIRCLE OF CARE: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGUATEMALA SANA CHILDREN'S PROJECT INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetLiving Water International: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS COUNTRY OF HOUSTON INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTHLAND CHRISTIAN SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds NORTHWEST ASSISTANCE MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds THE METHODIST HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CONCORDIA UNIVERSITY TEXAS ↗
  • Who funds LONE STAR CIRCLE OF CARE ↗
  • Who funds GUATEMALA SANA CHILDREN'S PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds Living Water International ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA6.1× affinity5 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Sam & Ada Petro Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Sam & Ada Petro Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Sam & Ada Petro’s filings →

    More from the funding graph