Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Sam & Ada Petro Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$4k
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$2k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Human Services$58kHealth$12kEducation$12kInternational$1kReligion$500
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$1,082
Median grant
1
States reached
$112k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HOUSTON METHODIST HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$1,500
MD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER$1,082
ALZHEMIER'S ASSOCIATION$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $33k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%LIVING WATER INTERNATIONAL: $50 → 8%BOYS & GIRLS COUNTRY OF HOUSTON: $9k → 16%BOYS & GIRLS COUNTRY OF HOUSTON: $5k → 16%BOYS & GIRLS COUNTRY OF HOUSTON: $5k → 16%BOYS & GIRLS COUNTRY OF HOUSTON: $4k → 16%BOYS & GIRLS COUNTRY OF HOUSTON: $3k → 16%BOYS & GIRLS COUNTRY OF HOUSTON: $2k → 16%BOYS & GIRLS COUNTRY OF HOUSTON: $2k → 16%NORTHWEST ASSISTANCE MINISTRIES: $2k → 16%NORTHWEST ASSISTANCE MINISTRIES: $2k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$78k · 8 repeat orgs$5k to everyone else

8 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
6

Total granted

$78k
$5k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+10%
+19%

Still filing today

50%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationHealthInternationalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BA
    BOYS AND GIRLS COUNTRY OF HOUSTON INC
    7× · 2017–2024 · $29k · revenue +10%
  • FO
    FOCUS ON THE FAMILY
    2× · 2022–2023 · $25k
  • NC
    NORTHLAND CHRISTIAN SCHOOL
    3× · 2017–2020 · $10k · revenue -24%

Funded once

  • CU
    CONCORDIA UNIVERSITY TEXAS
    one grant, 2017 · $2k · revenue -24%
  • LS
    LONE STAR CIRCLE OF CARE
    one grant, 2023 · $2k · revenue -12%
  • GS
    GUATEMALA SANA CHILDREN'S PROJECT INC
    one grant, 2018 · $1k · revenue +19%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Healing Hands Ministries Inc

Hmm health provides quality healthcare to all its neighbors with love, compassion, and respect.

Health
2
Houston Christian University

The mission of houston christian university is to provide a learning experience that instills in students a passion for academic, spiritual, and professional excellence as a result of our central confession, "jesus christ is lord."

3
Scott & White Hospital-College Station

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health
4
Baylor Scott & White Holdings

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health
5
Central Texas Christian School Inc

To educate students with the transforming truth of christ, inspiring academic excellence, godly character, and integrity in life pursuits.

6
Harris County Medical Society

Our mission is to be the leading advocate for our member physicians, their patients and our community, in promoting the highest standards of ethical medical practice, access to quality medical care, medical education, research, and…

7
Hill Country Montessori School Inc

Provide quality education for students from pre school through middle school using the Montessori method of learning and teaching.

Education
8
Northwestern Health Sciences University

Northwestern health sciences university prepares and serves the next generation of professionals and leaders to become vital contributors to the delivery and advancement of health care. our mission is accomplished through educational…

Education
9
Lutheran Education Association of Houston

The mission of the Lutheran Education Association of Houston (LEAH) is to operate and champion exemplary Lutheran schools in the Houston area to expand Christ's Kingdom.

10
Family Service Center of Houston and Harris County

The mission of Family Service Center of Houston and Harris County (Family Houston) is to create a stronger community for tomorrow by helping individuals and families meet the challenges they face today. We help others help themselves.

Human Services
11
Midwives College of Utah

Educate and train midwives to provide safe, professional, affordable and personal maternity and general health care.

Education
12
North Texas Area Community Health Center

Provide a community medical home through accessible, compassionate, and quality healthcare services in a community-based environment, maximizing the use of public and private resources to aid ntachc patients to obtain, regain, and maintain…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Concordia University Texas and the most unlike its peers is Living Water International. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
4/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

BOYS AND GIRLS COUNTRY OF HOUSTON INC — $29,250 · Human ServicesBOYS AND GIRLS COUNTRY OF HOUSTON INCNORTHWEST ASSISTANCE MINISTRIES — $3,900 · Human ServicesNORTHWEST ASSISTANCE MINISTRIES+1 more — $50 · Human ServicesFOCUS ON THE FAMILY — $25,000 · OtherFOCUS ON THE FAMILYMD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER — $2,432 · OtherMD ANDERSON CANCER CENTERALZHEMIER'S ASSOCIATION — $2,112 · OtherALZHEMIER'S ASSOCIATIONIndividual grant recipient — $2,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient+2 more — $750 · OtherNORTHLAND CHRISTIAN SCHOOL — $9,500 · EducationNORTHLAND CHRIS…CONCORDIA UNIVERSITY TEXAS — $2,000 · EducationCONCORDIA UNIVE…THE METHODIST HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — $3,500 · HealthLONE STAR CIRCLE OF CARE — $1,500 · HealthGUATEMALA SANA CHILDREN'S PROJECT INC — $1,000 · International
Human Services$33,200Other$32,294Education$11,500Health$5,000International$1,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetBOYS AND GIRLS COUNTRY OF HOUSTON INC — $29,250 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetNORTHLAND CHRISTIAN SCHOOL — $9,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetNORTHWEST ASSISTANCE MINISTRIES — $3,900 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE METHODIST HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — $3,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCONCORDIA UNIVERSITY TEXAS — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLONE STAR CIRCLE OF CARE — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGUATEMALA SANA CHILDREN'S PROJECT INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetLiving Water International — $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS COUNTRY OF HOUSTON INC
  • Who funds NORTHLAND CHRISTIAN SCHOOL
  • Who funds NORTHWEST ASSISTANCE MINISTRIES
  • Who funds THE METHODIST HOSPITAL FOUNDATION
  • Who funds CONCORDIA UNIVERSITY TEXAS
  • Who funds LONE STAR CIRCLE OF CARE
  • Who funds GUATEMALA SANA CHILDREN'S PROJECT INC
  • Who funds Living Water International

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA6.1× affinity5 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Sam & Ada Petro Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph