Skip to content

· Private foundation

Salizzoni Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$522k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$472k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Education$3.3MHealth$162kEmployment$105kReligion$15kFood & Nutrition$10kHuman Services$10kRecreation & Sports$2kCommunity Improvement$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $30k
  • $250k+1 grant · $472k
$10,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$5.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$472,000
THE GARDEN ACADEMY$10,000
LOX EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION$10,000
POOR CLARE NUNS OF BOSTON$10,000
SUSAN G KOMEN$5,000
JUPITER MEDICAL CENTER FDN$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
THE SOUTHERN CAREGIVER RESOURCE CTR$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 96% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%POOR CLARE NUNS OF BOSTON: $10k → 7%LOX EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $10k → 17%UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $25k → 11%PENN STATE SCHOLARSHIPS: $898k → 16%THE SOUTHERN CAREGIVER RESOURCE CTR: $5k → 11%SHLOFMITZ HEART FOUNDATION: $5k → 6%ST JUDE CHILDREN HOSPITAL: $1k → 17%SPECIAL OLYMPICS: $1k → 14%JUPITER MEDICAL CENTER FDN: $15k → 11%ERIN WILSON FOUNDATION: $1k → 15%KYBELE WORLDWIDE: $10k → 15%LA SALLE ACADEMY: $2k → 14%ALZHEIMERS ASSOCIATION: $5k → 14%ST CHARLES BORROMEO CHARITY: $5k → 5%THE GARDEN ACADEMY: $10k → 16%CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION: $5k → 8%JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $5k → 19%FOUNDATION FOR NH COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $40k → 7%CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER: $2k → 15%LOX EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $10k → 17%PENN STATE SCHOLARSHIPS: $472k → 16%JUPITER MEDICAL CENTER FDN: $12k → 11%KYBELE WORLDWIDE: $10k → 15%FOUNDATION FOR NH COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $35k → 7%LOX EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $10k → 17%PENN STATE SCHOLARSHIPS: $376k → 16%JUPITER MEDICAL CENTER FDN: $10k → 11%KYBELE WORLDWIDE: $10k → 15%FOUNDATION FOR NH COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $20k → 7%LOX EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $5k → 17%PENN STATE SCHOLARSHIPS: $373k → 16%JUPITER MEDICAL CENTER FDN: $10k → 11%NONPROFIT LEADERSHIP ALLIANCE: $2k → 15%KYBELE WORLDWIDE: $5k → 15%FOUNDATION FOR NH COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $10k → 7%LOX EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $5k → 17%PENN STATE SCHOLARSHIPS: $372k → 16%JUPITER MEDICAL CENTER FDN: $10k → 11%KYBELE WORLDWIDE: $5k → 15%LOX EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $2k → 17%PENN STATE SCHOLARSHIPS: $363k → 16%FOUNDATION DU CHUM: $5k → 11%KYBELE WORLDWIDE: $5k → 15%PENN STATE SCHOLARSHIPS: $327k → 16%JUPITER MEDICAL CENTER FDN: $5k → 11%PENN STATE UNIVERSITY HUNGER FUND: $10k → 16%NEW DAY ADULT CARE CENTER: $2k → 11%PENN STATE UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES: $2k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
NH
IL
NY
MA
PA
NJ
RI
CA
MO
KY
MD
NC
DC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.4M · 8 repeat orgs$121k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +119% since the first grant, against +4% for those funded once.

8 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
16

Total granted

$3.4M
$91k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+119%
+4%

Still filing today

25%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $30k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationPhilanthropyRecreation & SportsEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    6× · 2020–2025 · $3.2M
  • FF
    FOUNDATION FOR NH COMMUNITY COLLEGE
    4× · 2021–2024 · $105k
  • JM
    Jupiter Medical Center Foundation Inc
    6× · 2020–2025 · $62k · revenue +119%

Funded once

  • UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH
    one grant, 2021 · $25k · revenue +11%
  • JR
    JESUIT REFUGEE SERVICE USA
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
  • PS
    PENN STATE UNIVERSITY HUNGER FUND
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
2
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
3
Arc Research Institute

Our mission is to accelerate scientific progress, understand the root causes of disease, and narrow the gap between discoveries and impact on patients.

Health
4
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
5
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
6
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
7
Albert Einstein College of Medicine

Committed to exceptional healthcare quality for all and actively engaged with our community, einstein drives scientific discovery and educates compassionate leaders in health and science.

Education
8
American Academy of Neurology

The Academy's mission is to enhance member career fulfillment and promote brain health for all.

Community Improvement
9
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
10
Asco Association

Asco association promotes the common business interests of its members by: (1) advocating for policies that improve the quality of cancer care; (2) maintaining the highest standards of oncology medical care through programs supporting…

Community Improvement
11
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
12
Institute for Protein Innovation Inc

The institute for protein innovation is advancing protein science to accelerate research and improve human health.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of Pittsburgh; the most unlike its peers is Cystic Fibrosis Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
6/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $3,180,545 · OtherIndividual grant recipient+17 more: $257,500 · Other+17 moreJupiter Medical Center Foundation Inc: $62,000 · PhilanthropyUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $25,000 · EducationGARDEN ACADEMY INC: $10,000 · EducationJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $5,000 · EducationCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION: $5,000 · HealthALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $5,000 · HealthThe Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc: $5,000 · HealthSHLOFMITZ HEART FOUNDATION INC ATTNDDK: $5,000 · HealthSPECIAL OLYMPICS INC: $2,000 · Recreation & SportsKennebunk Land Trust: $1,000 · Environment
Other$3,438,045Philanthropy$62,000Education$40,000Health$20,000Recreation & Sports$2,000Environment$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJupiter Medical Center Foundation Inc: $62,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGARDEN ACADEMY INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHLOFMITZ HEART FOUNDATION INC ATTNDDK: $5,000 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNONPROFIT LEADERSHIP ALLIANCE: $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetKennebunk Land Trust: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Jupiter Medical Center Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH ↗
  • Who funds GARDEN ACADEMY INC ↗
  • Who funds CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds SHLOFMITZ HEART FOUNDATION INC ATTNDDK ↗
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS INC ↗
  • Who funds NONPROFIT LEADERSHIP ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds Kennebunk Land Trust ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Salizzoni Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Salizzoni Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 12%
  • Johns Hopkins University: 12% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Salizzoni Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph