Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Salizzoni Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$522k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$472k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Education$3.3MHealth$162kEmployment$105kReligion$15kFood & Nutrition$10kHuman Services$10kRecreation & Sports$2kCommunity Improvement$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $30k
  • $250k+1 grant · $472k
$10,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$5.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$472,000
LOX EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION$10,000
THE GARDEN ACADEMY$10,000
POOR CLARE NUNS OF BOSTON$10,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
THE SOUTHERN CAREGIVER RESOURCE CTR$5,000
JUPITER MEDICAL CENTER FDN$5,000
SUSAN G KOMEN$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 96% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%POOR CLARE NUNS OF BOSTON: $10k → 7%LOX EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $10k → 17%UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $25k → 11%PENN STATE SCHOLARSHIPS: $898k → 16%THE SOUTHERN CAREGIVER RESOURCE CTR: $5k → 11%SHLOFMITZ HEART FOUNDATION: $5k → 6%ST JUDE CHILDREN HOSPITAL: $1k → 17%SPECIAL OLYMPICS: $1k → 14%JUPITER MEDICAL CENTER FDN: $15k → 11%ERIN WILSON FOUNDATION: $1k → 15%KYBELE WORLDWIDE: $10k → 15%LA SALLE ACADEMY: $2k → 14%ALZHEIMERS ASSOCIATION: $5k → 14%ST CHARLES BORROMEO CHARITY: $5k → 5%THE GARDEN ACADEMY: $10k → 16%CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION: $5k → 8%JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $5k → 19%FOUNDATION FOR NH COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $40k → 7%CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER: $2k → 15%LOX EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $10k → 17%PENN STATE SCHOLARSHIPS: $472k → 16%JUPITER MEDICAL CENTER FDN: $12k → 11%KYBELE WORLDWIDE: $10k → 15%FOUNDATION FOR NH COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $35k → 7%LOX EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $10k → 17%PENN STATE SCHOLARSHIPS: $376k → 16%JUPITER MEDICAL CENTER FDN: $10k → 11%KYBELE WORLDWIDE: $10k → 15%FOUNDATION FOR NH COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $20k → 7%LOX EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $5k → 17%PENN STATE SCHOLARSHIPS: $373k → 16%JUPITER MEDICAL CENTER FDN: $10k → 11%NONPROFIT LEADERSHIP ALLIANCE: $2k → 15%KYBELE WORLDWIDE: $5k → 15%FOUNDATION FOR NH COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $10k → 7%LOX EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $5k → 17%PENN STATE SCHOLARSHIPS: $372k → 16%JUPITER MEDICAL CENTER FDN: $10k → 11%KYBELE WORLDWIDE: $5k → 15%LOX EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $2k → 17%PENN STATE SCHOLARSHIPS: $363k → 16%FOUNDATION DU CHUM: $5k → 11%KYBELE WORLDWIDE: $5k → 15%PENN STATE SCHOLARSHIPS: $327k → 16%JUPITER MEDICAL CENTER FDN: $5k → 11%PENN STATE UNIVERSITY HUNGER FUND: $10k → 16%NEW DAY ADULT CARE CENTER: $2k → 11%PENN STATE UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES: $2k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
NH
IL
NY
MA
PA
NJ
RI
CA
MO
KY
MD
NC
DC
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$3.4M · 8 repeat orgs$121k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +95% since the first grant, against +4% for the ones you funded once.

8 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
16

Total granted

$3.4M
$91k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+95%
+4%

Still filing today

25%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $30k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationPhilanthropyRecreation & SportsEnvironmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    6× · 2020–2025 · $3.2M
  • FF
    FOUNDATION FOR NH COMMUNITY COLLEGE
    4× · 2021–2024 · $105k
  • JM
    Jupiter Medical Center Foundation Inc
    6× · 2020–2025 · $62k · revenue +95%

Funded once

  • UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH
    one grant, 2021 · $25k · revenue +11%
  • JR
    JESUIT REFUGEE SERVICE USA
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
  • PS
    PENN STATE UNIVERSITY HUNGER FUND
    one grant, 2022 · $10k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
2
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
3
Arc Research Institute

Our mission is to accelerate scientific progress, understand the root causes of disease, and narrow the gap between discoveries and impact on patients.

Health
4
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
5
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
6
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
7
Albert Einstein College of Medicine

Committed to exceptional healthcare quality for all and actively engaged with our community, einstein drives scientific discovery and educates compassionate leaders in health and science.

Education
8
American Academy of Neurology

The Academy's mission is to enhance member career fulfillment and promote brain health for all.

Community Improvement
9
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
10
Asco Association

Asco association promotes the common business interests of its members by: (1) advocating for policies that improve the quality of cancer care; (2) maintaining the highest standards of oncology medical care through programs supporting…

Community Improvement
11
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

12
Institute for Protein Innovation Inc

The institute for protein innovation is advancing protein science to accelerate research and improve human health.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of Pittsburgh and the most unlike its peers is Cystic Fibrosis Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
6/11
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Individual grant recipient — $3,180,545 · OtherIndividual grant recipient+17 more — $257,500 · Other+17 moreJupiter Medical Center Foundation Inc — $62,000 · PhilanthropyUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH — $25,000 · EducationGARDEN ACADEMY INC — $10,000 · EducationJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY — $5,000 · EducationThe Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc — $5,000 · HealthALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC — $5,000 · HealthSHLOFMITZ HEART FOUNDATION INC ATTNDDK — $5,000 · HealthCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION — $5,000 · HealthSPECIAL OLYMPICS INC — $2,000 · Recreation & SportsKennebunk Land Trust — $1,000 · Environment
Other$3,438,045Philanthropy$62,000Education$40,000Health$20,000Recreation & Sports$2,000Environment$1,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetJupiter Medical Center Foundation Inc — $62,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGARDEN ACADEMY INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHLOFMITZ HEART FOUNDATION INC ATTNDDK — $5,000 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS INC — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNONPROFIT LEADERSHIP ALLIANCE — $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetKennebunk Land Trust — $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Jupiter Medical Center Foundation Inc
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH
  • Who funds GARDEN ACADEMY INC
  • Who funds JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC
  • Who funds SHLOFMITZ HEART FOUNDATION INC ATTNDDK
  • Who funds CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS INC
  • Who funds NONPROFIT LEADERSHIP ALLIANCE
  • Who funds Kennebunk Land Trust

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Salizzoni Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 12%
  • Johns Hopkins University12% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph