Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Private foundation

Salesforce Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$36M
Granted FY2025still arriving
22
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$7.3M
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2025.

Education$118MPhilanthropy$45MEmployment$17MYouth Development$6.5MHealth$3.1MHousing & Shelter$1.8MArts & Culture$1.1MCivil Rights$1.0MOther$0
02FY2025 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
  • $250k+21 grants · $36M
$1,000,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$398M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TIDES FOUNDATION$7,338,600
OAKLAND UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT$5,000,000
SPARK SF PUBLIC SCHOOLS$5,000,000
CODEORG$2,000,000
CAREERVILLAGE INC$1,000,000
INDIANAPOLIS PUBLIC SCHOOLS EDUCATION FOUNDATION$1,000,000
DIGITAL PROMISE GLOBAL$1,000,000
BEYOND 12 EDUCATION INC$1,000,000
KHAN ACADEMY INC$1,000,000
CHILDREN FIRST FUND - THE CHICAGO PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION$1,000,000
ROBIN HOOD FOUNDATION$1,000,000
TNTP INC (THE NEW TEACHER PROJECT)$1,000,000
ONEGOAL$1,000,000
HIDDEN GENIUS PROJECT$1,000,000
THE EDUCATION TRUST INC$1,000,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $3.8M) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%SIMON SAYS GIVE: $5k → 6%K9 CARE MONTANA: $200 → 11%MALLINA FOUNDATION: $250 → 11%CHILDREN'S HOME OF JEFFERSON COUNTY: $300 → 14%PACK SHACK OF NORTHWEST ARKANSAS: $5k → 8%ANGELS' PLACE: $200 → 8%BLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK: $5k → 15%INTERFAITH SOCIAL SERVICES: $200 → 7%GATHERING INN: $200 → 6%HOPE HOSPITALITY AND WARMING CENTER: $200 → 8%KIMOCHI: $200 → 10%SHELTERING WINGS CENTER FOR WOMEN: $200 → 5%FURNITURE BANK OF METRO ATLANTA: $600 → 13%FURNITURE BANK OF METRO ATLANTA: $600 → 13%THE ROAD HOME: $300 → 8%PURPOSEFUL LIVING: $200 → 5%NIGHT MINISTRY: $4k → 14%HOPELINK: $200 → 9%THE CITIZENS FOUNDATION USA: $200 → 14%PAJAMA PROGRAM: $550 → 17%SUNNYVALE COMMUNITY SERVICES: $200 → 8%SHEPHERD COMMUNITY: $200 → 16%NATIONAL COUNCIL OF YMCAS OF THE USA: $154k → 14%ANNIECANNONS: $500k → 10%GIRLS INC OF ALAMEDA COUNTY: $200 → 10%CRADLES TO CRAYONS: $5k → 14%CRADLES TO CRAYONS: $2k → 14%CRADLES TO CRAYONS: $200 → 14%WHEELER MISSION MINISTRIES: $250 → 16%SERVING OTHERS WORLDWIDE: $200 → 10%YMCA OF GREATER INDIANAPOLIS: $200 → 16%COVENANT HOUSE: $3k → 17%INDIANA YOUTH GROUP INC: $200 → 16%AT THE CROSSROADS: $3k → 10%AT THE CROSSROADS: $2k → 10%AT THE CROSSROADS: $1k → 10%CHARITY WATER: $5k → 17%LARKIN STREET YOUTH SERVICES: $1.0M → 10%COMPASS FAMILY SERVICES: $550k → 10%LARKIN STREET YOUTH SERVICES: $300 → 10%SHELTER TECH: $320 → 10%TIDES CENTER: $1.0M → 10%YMCA OF SAN FRANCISCO: $27k → 10%YMCA OF SAN FRANCISCO: $6k → 10%WAWOS: $1k → 10%PROJECT NIGHT NIGHT: $5k → 10%PROJECT NIGHT NIGHT: $3k → 10%CATHOLIC CHARITIES CYO OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF SAN FRANCISCO: $550k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
VT
NH
WA
ID
MT
ND
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
WV
VA
MD
DE
AZ
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
HI
OK
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

78%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$120M · 194 repeat orgs$34M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +41% since the first grant, against +32% for the ones you funded once.

194 repeat relationships — 15 still active in FY2025, 179 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

194
1774

Total granted

$120M
$28M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+41%
+32%

Still filing today

91%
68%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6.0M went to new ones.

50%100%’18’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesHealthAnimalsInternationalArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IP
    INDIANAPOLIS PUBLIC SCHOOLS EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $4.4M · revenue +135%
  • TF
    THE FUND FOR PUBLIC SCHOOLS INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $4.3M · revenue +32%
  • C
    CODEORG
    2× · 2020–2025 · $2.0M · revenue +18%

Funded once

  • TC
    TIDES CENTER (PROJECT NAME NEXT CHAPTER)
    one grant, 2023 · $2.5M
  • F
    FFWD
    one grant, 2024 · $1.5M · revenue 0%
  • JF
    JOBS FOR THE FUTURE INC
    one grant, 2024 · $1.0M · revenue 0%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Silicon Schools Fund Inc

The mission of the silicon schools fund is to improve education through supporting the launch of excellent new schools, improving academic instruction in existing schools, and by funding some of the boldest innovations in education…

Education
2
The San Diego Foundation

The san diego foundation inspires enduring philanthropy and enables community solutions to improve the quality of life in our region.

Philanthropy
3
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
4
International Biomedical Research Alliance

Our mission is to invest in and accelerate the development of the most promising future leaders in biomedical research with global impact.

Health
5
Allosource

Inspired by the gift of donation from our communities, allosource responsibly provides innovative cellular and tissue allografts to advance patient healing.

Health
6
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
7
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
8
Internet Society Foundation

At the internet society foundation, we focus on funding initiatives that strengthen the internet in function and reach so that it can effectively serve all people. our work advances the vision of the internet society (isoc): the internet…

International
9
California Dental Association Foundation

The foundation's mission is to improve the oral health of all californians by supporting the dental profession and its efforts to meet community needs.

Science & Tech
10
The Water Research Foundation

The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…

Environment
11
Community Foundation Santa Cruz County

To promote philanthropy to make santa cruz county a better place to live, now and in the future.we bring together people, ideas, and resources to inspire philanthropy and accomplish great things.

Philanthropy
12
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of America and the most unlike its peers is Thacher & Straitsmouth Islands Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity FoundationsPolicy Research and AdvocacySchool District FoundationsWomen & Girls Leadership De…Domestic Violence ServicesIndependent K-12 SchoolsYouth Development ServicesSenior Support Services
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number24%1%<5yr15%5%5–10yr20%23%10–20yr17%32%20–35yr11%22%35–55yr13%18%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value24%2%<5yr15%3%5–10yr20%40%10–20yr17%16%20–35yr11%37%35–55yr13%1%55yr+

The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 1.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
1.0%20/2,068
the rest of the field
14%
25,996/184,910

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

1458 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 1458 of the 2,000 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

6
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
359
Early backer (in before they grew)
1407/1458
Grantees still filing
1063/1458
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

SPARK SF PUBLIC SCHOOLS — $33,500,000 · EducationSPARK SF PUBLIC SCHOOLSINDIANAPOLIS PUBLIC SCHOOLS EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC — $4,355,000 · EducationINDIANAPOLIS PUBLIC SCHOOLS EDUCATION F…CHILDREN FIRST FUND THE CHICAGO PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION — $4,350,000 · EducationCHILDREN FIRST FUND THE CHICAGO PUBLIC …YEAR UP INC — $2,540,100 · Education+40 more — $23,765,908 · Education+40 moreOAKLAND UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT — $33,500,000 · OtherOAKLAND UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICTSFUSD — $11,608,181 · OtherSFUSDTHE FUND FOR PUBLIC SCHOOLS INC — $4,250,000 · OtherTHE FUND FOR PUBLIC SCHOOLS INCTIDES CENTER (PROJECT NAME NEXT CHAPTER) — $2,500,000 · Other+89 more — $12,972,188 · Other+89 moreTIDES FOUNDATION — $39,796,410 · PhilanthropyTIDES FOUNDATIONFFWD — $1,500,000 · Philanthropy+6 more — $1,049,850 · PhilanthropyONEGOAL — $1,500,000 · Youth DevelopmentBRAVEN INC — $1,100,000 · Youth DevelopmentENTERPRISE FOR YOUTH — $1,051,400 · Youth DevelopmentIMENTOR INC — $1,010,200 · Youth DevelopmentCOLLABORATIVE FOR ACADEMIC SOCIAL AND EMOTIONAL LEARNING — $750,000 · Youth DevelopmentRe Coded Co — $500,000 · Youth DevelopmentAI4ALL — $500,000 · Youth DevelopmentPEER HEALTH EXCHANGE INC — $500,000 · Youth Development+4 more — $227,619 · Youth DevelopmentPER SCHOLAS INC — $1,091,500 · EmploymentBURNING GLASS INSTITUTE — $1,000,000 · EmploymentJOBS FOR THE FUTURE INC — $1,000,000 · EmploymentBOSTON PRIVATE INDUSTRY COUNCIL INC THE — $1,000,000 · EmploymentUPWARDLY GLOBAL — $662,650 · EmploymentINNER-CITY COMPUTER STARS FOUNDATION — $450,050 · EmploymentThe Knowledge House Fellowship Inc — $355,000 · EmploymentDev Color — $350,000 · EmploymentGoodwill of The San Francisco Bay — $235,000 · Employment+3 more — $208,100 · EmploymentLarkin Street Youth Services — $1,000,825 · Human ServicesTIDES CENTER — $1,000,000 · Human ServicesCOMPASS FAMILY SERVICES — $550,000 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC CHARITIES CYO OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF SAN FRANCISCO — $550,000 · Human ServicesAnnieCannons Inc — $500,000 · Human ServicesNational Council of YMCAs of the USA — $154,000 · Human Services+14 more — $114,935 · Human ServicesNEW VENTURE FUND — $1,500,000 · EnvironmentDREAMORG — $1,000,000 · EnvironmentEcoRise Youth Innovations — $250,000 · Environment+8 more — $108,850 · Environment
Education$68,511,008Other$64,830,369Philanthropy$42,346,260Youth Development$7,139,219Employment$6,352,300Human Services$3,869,760Environment$2,858,850

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTIDES FOUNDATION — $39,796,410 over 6y, 2.5% of budgetSPARK SF PUBLIC SCHOOLS — $33,500,000 over 5y, 55% of budgetINDIANAPOLIS PUBLIC SCHOOLS EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC — $4,355,000 over 6y, 18% of budgetCHILDREN FIRST FUND THE CHICAGO PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION — $4,350,000 over 5y, 7.0% of budgetTHE FUND FOR PUBLIC SCHOOLS INC — $4,250,000 over 6y, 5.5% of budgetYEAR UP INC — $2,540,100 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetBEYOND 12 EDUCATION INC — $2,275,000 over 3y, 14% of budgetCODEORG — $2,000,200 over 2y, 7.9% of budgetTNTP INC — $1,750,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetFFWD — $1,500,000 over 1y, 6.6% of budgetThe Education Trust Inc — $1,500,000 over 2y, 3.0% of budgetONEGOAL — $1,500,000 over 2y, 3.5% of budgetNEW VENTURE FUND — $1,500,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetNEW LEADERS INC — $1,500,000 over 2y, 3.8% of budgetUASPIRE INC — $1,250,000 over 2y, 6.1% of budgetTHE BOTTOM LINE INC — $1,250,000 over 2y, 2.6% of budgetBRAVEN INC — $1,100,000 over 3y, 7.6% of budgetPER SCHOLAS INC — $1,091,500 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetENTERPRISE FOR YOUTH — $1,051,400 over 5y, 10% of budgetIMENTOR INC — $1,010,200 over 2y, 3.8% of budgetLarkin Street Youth Services — $1,000,825 over 2y, 3.2% of budgetKHAN ACADEMY INC — $1,000,200 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetHIDDEN GENIUS PROJECT — $1,000,050 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOLLEGE POSSIBLE INC — $1,000,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetJOBS FOR THE FUTURE INC — $1,000,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetDREAMORG — $1,000,000 over 1y, 18% of budgetTHE AMERICAN AI FORUM — $1,000,000 over 1y, 42% of budgetBOSTON PRIVATE INDUSTRY COUNCIL INC THE — $1,000,000 over 2y, 5.3% of budget3DE NATIONAL LLC — $1,000,000 over 1y, 7.3% of budgetTIDES CENTER — $1,000,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR EDUCATIONAL LEADERSHIP — $785,000 over 1y, 6.9% of budgetNAMI National — $750,150 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetCOLLABORATIVE FOR ACADEMIC SOCIAL AND EMOTIONAL LEARNING — $750,000 over 1y, 6.4% of budgetCODEPATHORG — $745,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetUPWARDLY GLOBAL — $662,650 over 3y, 4.5% of budgetResearch Foundation of the City University of New York — $590,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOMPASS FAMILY SERVICES — $550,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES CYO OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF SAN FRANCISCO — $550,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetGENESYS WORKS — $550,000 over 2y, 3.8% of budgetCOLLEGE TRACK — $503,450 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetHomeless Prenatal Program Inc — $500,050 over 2y, 2.7% of budgetRe Coded Co — $500,000 over 1y, 27% of budgetBLUEPRINT SCHOOLS NETWORK INC — $500,000 over 1y, 15% of budgetAnnieCannons Inc — $500,000 over 1y, 28% of budgetCODE THE DREAM INC — $500,000 over 1y, 5.3% of budget1MILLION PROJECT FOUNDATION — $500,000 over 1y, 8.6% of budgetJEWISH VOCATIONAL & CAREER COUNSELING SERVICE — $500,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetAI4ALL — $500,000 over 1y, 16% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Nicholas H Noyes Jr M…Richard M Fairbanks F…McNabb FoundationGolden State Communit…The Yelp FoundationBright Funds Foundati…Bothin FoundationThe Stanley S Langend…Maurer Family Foundat…Crankstart FoundationThe William G Gilmore…United Way of Central…
Nicholas H Noyes Jr Memorial FoundationIN47.9× affinity42 shared granteesties to 5 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Nicholas H Noyes Jr Memorial Foundation · Richard M Fairbanks Foundation Inc · McNabb Foundation · Golden State Community Foundation · The Yelp Foundation · Bright Funds Foundation · Bothin Foundation · The Stanley S Langendorf Foundation · Maurer Family Foundation Inc · Crankstart Foundation · The William G Gilmore Foundation · United Way of Central Indiana Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Salesforce Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%4%15%34%60%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • Enterprise Community Partners Inc — 22% of income from government
  • Jobs for the Future Inc — 11% of income from government
  • Blueprint Schools Network Inc — 10% of income from government
  • United Way of Hunterdon County — 10% of income from government
  • Charles River Watershed Association Inc — 8% of income from government
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — 7% of income from government
  • Cradles to Crayons Inc — 2% of income from government
  • Uaspire Inc — 1% of income from government
  • The Bottom Line Inc — 0% of income from government
  • Year Up Inc — 0% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
72report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Salesforce Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Salesforce Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 2000 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines