· Private foundation
Sai Shiva Charitable Tr
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k7 grants · $7k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $181k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Divine Will Foundation | $120,000 |
| One World One Family Foundation | $61,001 |
| Love All Serve All Inc | $2,500 |
| Sai Shiva charitable Trust | $1,318 |
| Harbor Gateway Torrance Outreach | $690 |
| Sri Panchmukha Hanuman Temple | $532 |
| Los Angeles Mission | $501 |
| St Bonaventure Indian Mission & School | $501 |
| Individual grant recipient | $501 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your US giving — 78% of grant dollars ($299k). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 22% that went abroad ($83k) is mapped below.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 55% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
Beyond the US — 22% of all-years giving ($83k)
3 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +28% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
19 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
AMERICARES FOUNDATION INC4× · 2020–2023 · $6k · revenue +28%- SSSAI SHIVA CHARITABLE TR6× · 2020–2025 · $5k · revenue +825%
- BLBEACON LIGHT MISSION4× · 2020–2023 · $2k · revenue +69%
Funded once
- EFEDUCATION FOR ALL COone grant, 2024 · $25k · revenue 0%
- PBPrashanthi Balamandira Trustone grant, 2024 · $10k
- HTHEART TO HEART FOUNDATIONone grant, 2023 · $5k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To provide free healthcare services
To bring health workers, medical supplies and equipment to underserved areas of the world.
To reach out with the message of the gospel of jesus to the last, least, and the lost
To bring healthcare to those that are in need and cannot access it. We operate a mobile clinic in over 15 small villages in rural parts of India where there are no clinics, doctors or pharmacies We screen, diagnose, treat and provide free…
Mission work
Preventing needless and preventable blindness-eyes check vision foundation -mumbai around 1200 patients treated
Helping the needy people in india and us .
Provide food relief to third world areas.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wounded Warrior Project Inc and the most unlike its peers is The National World War Ii Museum Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds DIVINE WILL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ONE WORLD ONE FAMILY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds EDUCATION FOR ALL CO ↗
- Who funds AMERICARES FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds HEART TO HEART FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds LOVE ALL SERVE ALL INC ↗
- Who funds SAI SHIVA CHARITABLE TR ↗
- Who funds BEACON LIGHT MISSION ↗
- Who funds LOS ANGELES MISSION INC ↗
- Who funds MESA REFUGE A NONPROFIT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds CENTRAL MASSACHUSETTS HOUSING ALLIANCE INC ↗
- Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
- Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds THE NATIONAL WORLD WAR II MUSEUM INC ↗
- Who funds MEDICAL MISSION ADVENTURES ↗
- Who funds PALOS VERDES PERFORMING ARTS ↗
- Who funds SMAP FOUNDATION INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Sai Shiva Charitable Tr funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Central Massachusetts Housing Alliance Inc — 27% of income from government
- Americares Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
- Wounded Warrior Project Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.