Skip to content

· Private foundation

Sahai Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$47k
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2024.

Education$71kHuman Services$44kCivil Rights$24kFood & Nutrition$22kHealth$14kArts & Culture$4kYouth Development$3kPhilanthropy$2kOther$0
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k5 grants · $12k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $36k
$2,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$995k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$20,000
Ashiyaana$15,500
LWV Fairfax Education Fund$6,000
Reproductive Freedom for All$2,000
National Association of Pregnant Wo$2,000
CHEC Foundation$1,000
Karuna Charities$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–24, $37k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 5% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Ashiyaana: $18k → 8%Ashiyaana: $16k → 8%Ashiyaana: $1k → 8%Reproductive Freedom for All: $2k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
ID
NY
CO
NE
VA
MD
TN
DC
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 26% of Sahai Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 10% of the giving stays in VA; by stated purpose, 7%.

Sahai Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

66%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$140k · 10 repeat orgs$71k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +19% since the first grant, against +10% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
21

Total granted

$140k
$47k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+19%
+10%

Still filing today

60%
24%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 49% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $24k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24
Food & NutritionArts & CultureHuman ServicesPhilanthropyHealthEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AI
    ASHIYANAA INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $35k · revenue +19%
  • PJ
    PREGNANCY JUSTICE INC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $4k · revenue +65%
  • FR
    FOOD RECOVERY NETWORK INC
    2× · 2021–2022 · $4k · revenue +73%

Funded once

  • HC
    Highlander Centre
    one grant, 2022 · $7k
  • IS
    IDAHO STEM ACTION CENTER
    one grant, 2021 · $6k
  • HIGHLANDER RESEARCH & EDUCATION CENTER INC
    one grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue -30%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Indigenous Peoples Rights Inc

To lead and coordinate the global initiative to address and prevent criminalization, violence, and impunity against indigenous peoples towards strengthening their collectives, solidarity, and actions.

Human Services
2
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
3
Open Markets Institute

The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.

Education
4
The International Institute On Race Equality and Human Rights

The international institute on race, equality and human rights contributes to the promotion and defense of human rights, through training, technical assistance, advocacy, and strategic litigation conducted at the regional and international…

International
5
Women's Law Project

Women's law project creates a more just and equitable society by advancing the rights and status of all women throughout their lives. to this end, we engage in high-impact litigation, advocacy, and education. the core values of women's law…

Civil Rights
6
Guttmacher Institute Inc

The institute is a leading research and policy organization committed to advancing sexual and reproductive health and rights in the united states and globally.

—
7
The Conversationalist
—
8
National Institute for Reproductive Health Inc

National institute for reproductive health, inc. works to protect and advance equitable access to reproductive health care by building power at the state and local level. using an approach that is rooted in partnerships with state and…

Civil Rights
9
Direct Action for Women Now World-Wide Inc Formerly Indias Daughters Inc
Philanthropy
10
Asociacion Interamericana Para La Defensa Del Ambiente

To strenghten people's ability to guarantee their individual and collective right to a healthy environment, via the development, implementation, and effective enforcement of national and international law.

Crime & Legal
11
Independent Diplomat Inc

To offer independent and confidential advice and practical assistance in diplomatic strategy and technique to governments, political groups, international organizations and ngos on diplomatic process and decision-making.

International
12
The Fund for Peace Inc

Building bridges across diverse sectors, and developing innovative technologies and tools for policy makers. a leader in the conflict assessment and early warning field, the fund for peace focuses on the problems of weak and failing…

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Physicians for Human Rights Inc; the most unlike its peers is Idaho Foodbank Warehouse. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/13
Grantees still filing
6/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $20,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientLWV Fairfax Education Fund: $8,000 · OtherLWV Fairfax Education FundHighlander Centre: $7,000 · OtherHighlander CentreIDAHO STEM ACTION CENTER: $5,616 · OtherIDAHO STEM ACTION CENTERWOLFTRAP: $4,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $4,000 · OtherKARUNA CHARITIES: $3,500 · OtherLWL FAIRFAX ED FUND: $3,000 · OtherNaral Pro Choice now called Reprodu: $3,000 · OtherPREGNANCY JUSTICE INC: $4,000 · Other+15 more: $16,779 · Other+15 morePRATHAM USA: $54,000 · PhilanthropyPRATHAM USAASHIYANAA INC: $34,500 · Human ServicesASHIYANAA INCREPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM FOR ALL: $2,000 · Human ServicesREPRODUCTIVE FREEDO…IDAHO FOODBANK WAREHOUSE: $18,164 · Food & NutritionIDAHO FOODB…FOOD RECOVERY NETWORK INC: $4,000 · Food & NutritionFOOD RECOVE…DRUG POLICY ALLIANCE: $8,500 · HealthWOLF TRAP FOUNDATION FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS: $4,000 · Arts & CultureALL STARS PROJECT INC: $1,217 · Arts & CultureHIGHLANDER RESEARCH & EDUCATION CENTER INC: $5,000 · Environment
Other$78,895Philanthropy$54,000Human Services$36,500Food & Nutrition$22,164Health$8,500Arts & Culture$5,217Environment$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPRATHAM USA: $54,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetASHIYANAA INC: $34,500 over 3y, 3.6% of budgetIDAHO FOODBANK WAREHOUSE: $18,164 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDRUG POLICY ALLIANCE: $8,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHIGHLANDER RESEARCH & EDUCATION CENTER INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOLF TRAP FOUNDATION FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPREGNANCY JUSTICE INC: $4,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFOOD RECOVERY NETWORK INC: $4,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetREPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM FOR ALL: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALL STARS PROJECT INC: $1,217 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL COALITION AGAINST DOMESTIC VIOLENCE: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPHYSICIANS FOR HUMAN RIGHTS INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetADA DEVELOPERS ACADEMY: $440 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PRATHAM USA ↗
  • Who funds ASHIYANAA INC ↗
  • Who funds IDAHO FOODBANK WAREHOUSE ↗
  • Who funds DRUG POLICY ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds HIGHLANDER RESEARCH & EDUCATION CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds WOLF TRAP FOUNDATION FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS ↗
  • Who funds PREGNANCY JUSTICE INC ↗
  • Who funds FOOD RECOVERY NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds REPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM FOR ALL ↗
  • Who funds ALL STARS PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL COALITION AGAINST DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ↗
  • Who funds PHYSICIANS FOR HUMAN RIGHTS INC ↗
  • Who funds ADA DEVELOPERS ACADEMY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Vanguard Charitable Endowment ProgramPA9.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Sahai Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Sahai Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Sahai Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph