Skip to content

· Public charity

Safari Club International Foundation

Ensure the future of wildlife through conservation, education, and hunting.

$545k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
—
States reached
$90k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Animals$1.6MEnvironment$913kArts & Culture$537kEducation$522kYouth Development$343kHuman Services$265kInternational$260kRecreation & Sports$257kOther$0
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 5 grants below total $246,034, the rows itemized in this filing. The $544,562 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $298,528 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $30k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $216k
$51,034
Median grant
—
States reached
$63M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GRIZZLY BEAR YUKON RES$90,000
UNIVERSITY PROGRAM$75,000
CHAPTER MATCHING GRANTS$51,034
Individual grant recipient$20,000
BELL FAMILY HUMANITARIAN$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–22) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 80% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%SAFARI CLUB INTERNATIONAL: $25k → 15%UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA: $54k → 9%WILD SHEEP FOUNDATION: $46k → 10%BANOVICH WILDSCAPES FOUNDATION: $50k → 10%MONTANA'S OUTDOOR LEGACY FOUNDATION: $65k → 11%SPURWING: $100k → 11%INTEGRAL ECOLOGY RESEARCH CENTER: $50k → 18%ESF COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $70k → 14%ADAM CLEMENTS SAFARIS LLC: $60k → 7%LONESOME CREEK RESORT LLC: $32k → 14%PARKS AND WILDLIFE FOUNDATION OF TEXAS INC: $39k → 14%HOUSTON CHAPTER: $33k → 16%NEW MEXICO STATE UNIVERSITY: $35k → 23%ACOMA BIG GAME TROPHY HUNTS: $23k → 30%NAVAJO NATION DEPARTMENT OF FISH & WILDLIFE: $31k → 32%AMERICA'S WILDLIFE ASSOCIAION FOR RESOURCE EDUCATION: $30k → 14%SAVE VALLEY CONSERVANCY FUND INC: $25k → 13%TEN DIRECTIONS: $24k → 11%THE GUTIERREZ WILDLIFE CENTER: $40k → 13%DISCOVER MEDIAWORKS INC: $180k → 10%BOREN STUART: $24k → 11%STATE OF COLORADO: $50k → 12%THE SALVATION ARMY: $90k → 14%BLOOD ORIGINS INC: $143k → 15%MISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITY-CARNIVORE ECOLOGY LAB: $117k → 24%THE GEOS FOUNDATION: $50k → 7%VIRGINIA TECH FOUNDATION INC: $42k → 21%STATE OF VERMONT DEPT OF FISH & WILDLIFE: $32k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA: $50k → 9%SPURWING: $85k → 11%ESF COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $55k → 14%REGENTS OF NEW MEXICO STATE UNIVERSITY: $30k → 23%SAVE VALLEY CONSERVANCY FUND INC: $25k → 13%DISCOVER MEDIAWORKS INC: $60k → 10%DIKEMBE MUTOMBO FOUNDATION INC: $250k → 8%THE SALVATION ARMY OUTDOORS: $30k → 14%BLOOD ORIGINS INC: $30k → 15%MISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITY-CARNIVORE ECOLOGY LAB: $43k → 24%UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA: $50k → 9%DISCOVER MEDIAWORKS INC: $55k → 10%THE SALVATION ARMY OUTDOORS: $30k → 14%DISCOVER MEDIAWORKS INC: $29k → 10%ARIZONA GAME & FISH DEPARTMENT: $50k → 11%INCLUSIVE CONSERVATION GROUP: $264k → 14%INCLUSIVE CONSERVATION GROUP: $134k → 14%INCLUSIVE CONSERVATION GROUP: $125k → 14%INCLUSIVE CONSERVATION GROUP: $100k → 14%INCLUSIVE CONSERVATION GROUP: $50k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
VT
MT
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
OR
NV
WY
IA
OH
CA
CO
VA
MD
AZ
NM
NC
DC
MS
GA
TX
FL

Grants abroad, by region: $297k on the FY2025 return

Schedule F, as filed: 1 region. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Sub-Saharan Africa$297k · 100% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: PROGRAM SUPPORT

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 15% of Safari Club International Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Safari Club International Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 12% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

64%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.2M · 26 repeat orgs$1.8M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +55% since the first grant, against +21% for those funded once.

26 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 25 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

26
53

Total granted

$3.2M
$1.6M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+55%
+21%

Still filing today

38%
49%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 8% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $226k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsEnvironmentEducationRecreation & SportsPhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TO
    THE ORIGINS FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2021–2022 · $173k · revenue +240%
  • EC
    ESF COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC
    3× · 2019–2021 · $145k · revenue +144%
  • WE
    WILDLIFE ECOLOGY INSTITUTE
    2× · 2017–2018 · $77k · revenue +160% · 40% of their budget

Funded once

  • DI
    DMF Internationl Inc
    one grant, 2022 · $250k · revenue -23%
  • S
    SHEPHERDSO
    one grant, 2023 · $150k
  • O
    OVERHEAD
    one grant, 2024 · $76k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Wilderness Conservation Foundation
Environment
2
Safari Club International New England Foundation Inc

Safari club international new england foundation promotes wildlife conservation and education and also serves as an advocate for hunters and hunting.

Animals
3
Safari Club International West Texas Chapter Inc

Education and Wildlife Conservation

Animals
4
Safari Club International Blue Mountain Chapter

Preserve, protect, and defend the freedom to hunt and to promote wildlife conservation.

Animals
5
Mzuri Wildlife Foundation

Mzuri wildlife foundation is dedicated to promoting wildlife conservation and educating and encouraging the next generation of outdoor sports enthusiasts with an emphasis on women and youth.

Animals
6
Mpala Wildlife Foundation Inc
—
7
Global Conservation Force Inc

Global conservation force is dedicated to saving wildlife from extinction through education, anti-poaching and conservation efforts.

Animals
8
Intertribal Sinkyone Wilderness Council
—
9
Safari Club International Minnesota

Promote wildlife and nature studies

—
10
Dallas Safari Club

The organization's mission is to conserve wildlife and wilderness lands; to educate the youth and the general public and to promote and protect the rights and interests of hunters worldwide.

—
11
Shikar-Safari Club International

The organizations mission is to teach and promote the conservation of wildlife and protection of the environment, including an annual convention to promote conservation.

Recreation & Sports
12
San Francisco Bay Safari Club

The organizations mission is to promote good fellowship among those who love the outdoors and the sport of hunting, shooting and fishing by promoting conservation of the wildlife of the world as a renewable resource in which hunting is one…

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wild Sheep Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Banovich Wildscapes Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

40 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 40 of the 85 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

5
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
13
Early backer (in before they grew)
38/40
Grantees still filing
29/40
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

INCLUSIVE CONSERVATION GROUP: $673,400 · OtherINCLUSIVE CONSERVATION GROUPDISCOVER MEDIAWORKS INC: $324,000 · OtherDISCOVER MEDIAWORKS INCDMF Internationl Inc: $250,000 · OtherDMF Internationl IncMISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITY: $192,086 · OtherSPURWING: $185,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $175,308 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMY: $157,681 · OtherTHE UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA: $153,917 · OtherSHEPHERDSO: $150,000 · Other+47 more: $1,684,347 · Other+47 moreTHE ORIGINS FOUNDATION INC: $172,500 · AnimalsTHE ORIGI…SAVE VALLEY CONSERVANCY FUND: $50,000 · AnimalsSAVE VALL…WILD SHEEP FOUNDATION: $48,000 · AnimalsWILD SHEE…SAFARI CLUB INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION: $41,537 · AnimalsSAFARI CL…AMERICA'S WILDLIFE ASSOCIATION FOR RESOURCE EDUCATION: $30,000 · AnimalsAMERICA'S…Wildlife Conservation Society: $25,000 · AnimalsWildlife …SAFARI CLUB INTERNATIONAL: $25,000 · AnimalsSAFARI CL…+4 more: $31,150 · Animals+4 moreWILDLIFE ECOLOGY INSTITUTE: $77,000 · EnvironmentMONTANAS OUTDOOR LEGACY FOUNDATION: $65,000 · EnvironmentGLOBAL EXPLORATION AND OCEANOGRAPHIC SOCIETY: $50,000 · EnvironmentDALLAS ECOLOGICAL FOUNDATION: $50,000 · EnvironmentPARKS AND WILDLIFE FOUNDATION OF TEXAS: $39,183 · EnvironmentKTK-BELT INC: $16,103 · EnvironmentNATIONAL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA FOUNDATION: $250,000 · Youth DevelopmentNational 4-H Council: $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentESF COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $145,000 · EducationVIRGINIA TECH FOUNDATION INC: $42,000 · EducationEmory University: $20,055 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF WYOMING FOUNDATION: $20,000 · EducationTRUSTEES OF THE HAMLINE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA: $18,025 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-STEVENS POINT FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · EducationNATIONAL ARCHERY IN SCHOOLS PROGRAMS INC: $36,000 · Recreation & SportsSAFARI CLUB INTERNATION HOUSTON GULF COAST CHAPTER: $33,425 · Recreation & SportsBANOVICH WILDSCAPES FOUNDATION: $50,000 · PhilanthropyAfrican Childrens Schools: $15,000 · Philanthropy
Other$3,945,739Animals$423,187Environment$297,286Youth Development$260,000Education$255,080Recreation & Sports$69,425Philanthropy$65,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetINCLUSIVE CONSERVATION GROUP: $673,400 over 4y, 90% of budgetNATIONAL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA FOUNDATION: $250,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetTHE ORIGINS FOUNDATION INC: $172,500 over 2y, 16% of budgetESF COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $145,000 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetWILDLIFE ECOLOGY INSTITUTE: $77,000 over 2y, 40% of budgetMONTANAS OUTDOOR LEGACY FOUNDATION: $65,000 over 1y, 8.7% of budgetIntegral Ecology Research Center: $50,000 over 1y, 5.7% of budgetSAVE VALLEY CONSERVANCY FUND: $50,000 over 2y, 8.2% of budgetGLOBAL EXPLORATION AND OCEANOGRAPHIC SOCIETY: $50,000 over 1y, 18% of budgetBANOVICH WILDSCAPES FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 1y, 35% of budgetDALLAS ECOLOGICAL FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetWILD SHEEP FOUNDATION: $48,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetVIRGINIA TECH FOUNDATION INC: $42,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAFARI CLUB INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION: $41,537 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetGUTIERREZ WILDLIFE CENTER: $40,000 over 1y, 16% of budgetPARKS AND WILDLIFE FOUNDATION OF TEXAS: $39,183 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSAFARI CLUB INTERNATIONAL SOUTHWEST OHIO: $38,569 over 4y, 86% of budgetNATIONAL ARCHERY IN SCHOOLS PROGRAMS INC: $36,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetAMERICA'S WILDLIFE ASSOCIATION FOR RESOURCE EDUCATION: $30,000 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetWildlife Conservation Society: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAFARI CLUB INTERNATIONAL: $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetEmory University: $20,055 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WYOMING FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE HAMLINE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA: $18,025 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSafari Club International Mid-Michigan Chapter: $17,240 over 2y, 7.9% of budgetKTK-BELT INC: $16,103 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetALASKA KENAI PEN CHPTR SAFARI CLUB INTL: $16,000 over 1y, 27% of budgetAfrican Childrens Schools: $15,000 over 1y, 3.7% of budgetEco Defense Group: $12,500 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetSAFARI CLUB INTERNATIONAL: $12,240 over 2y, 8.7% of budgetNational 4-H Council: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-STEVENS POINT FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSAFARI CLUB INTERNATIONAL IOWA CHAPTER INC: $9,450 over 1y, 9.2% of budgetSafari Club International Novi Chapter: $7,000 over 1y, 9.9% of budgetSAFARI CLUB INT'L SE MI BOWHUNTERS: $6,500 over 1y, 4.9% of budgetNORTHERN NEVADA CHAPTER OF SAFARI CLUB INTERNATIONAL: $6,150 over 1y, 3.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds INCLUSIVE CONSERVATION GROUP ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds DMF Internationl Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE ORIGINS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ESF COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds WILDLIFE ECOLOGY INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds MONTANAS OUTDOOR LEGACY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Integral Ecology Research Center ↗
  • Who funds SAVE VALLEY CONSERVANCY FUND ↗
  • Who funds GLOBAL EXPLORATION AND OCEANOGRAPHIC SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds BANOVICH WILDSCAPES FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds DALLAS ECOLOGICAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WILD SHEEP FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds VIRGINIA TECH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SAFARI CLUB INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds GUTIERREZ WILDLIFE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds PARKS AND WILDLIFE FOUNDATION OF TEXAS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation IncMT25.7× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation Inc · National Fish and Wildlife Foundation · Dsc Foundation Inc · The Nature Conservancy · Safari Club International West Texas Chapter Inc · Recreational Boating and Fishing Foundation · Investor Protection Trust · NRA Foundation Inc · Corporation for Public Broadcasting · National Collegiate Athletic Association · Share Our Strength · Greater Houston Community Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Safari Club International Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Safari Club International Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Safari Club International Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Safari Club International Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 85 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Safari Club International’s filings →

    More from the funding graph