How much did SACRAMENTO CONSOLIDATED CHARITIES grant in FY2020?

SACRAMENTO CONSOLIDATED CHARITIES reported 9 grants totaling $519,115 in its FY2020 IRS filing.

Where is SACRAMENTO CONSOLIDATED CHARITIES based?

SACRAMENTO CONSOLIDATED CHARITIES is based in CA.

SACRAMENTO CONSOLIDATED CHARITIES

Foundation Dossiers

· Public charity

SACRAMENTO CONSOLIDATED CHARITIES

The objectives of this corporation shall be to provide financial support through operation of a bingo facility and other activities for 501(c)(3) exempt and other qualified non-profit organizations and their successors.

$519k

Granted FY2020

Grants

Communities

$347k

Largest

01What you fund

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 43% of SACRAMENTO CONSOLIDATED CHARITIES’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2018

mobilizingpowervolunteersgenerositydonorsred crosscross prevents

2019

policepromoting

2020

—

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2020 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2020

Under $10k1 grant · $7k
$10k–50k7 grants · $121k
$250k+1 grant · $347k

$14,444

Median grant

States reached

Total assets

Largest grants

CALIFORNIA BREEZE SOFTBALL$347,272
FREE WESLEYAN CHURCH OF TONGA$23,663
MATAVAI MOUI O'MOUNGA SAIONE$23,451
TWIST-N-TUMBLE PARENTS CLUB$20,192
NORCAL STUDENT ATHLETES$14,444
FIRST SAMOAN CONGREGATIONAL$14,169
TONGAN CHRISTIAN CHURCH$12,869
UNITED STUDENT ATHLETES INC$12,481
YOUTH ACADEMICS ATHLETICS & THE AR$7,479

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–18, $33k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13% — the area typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$3.6M · 24 repeat orgs$229k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +9% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

24 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2020, 15 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$3.6M

$229k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+9%

Still filing today

42%

47%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2020, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Recreation & SportsEducationHuman ServicesHealthCommunity ImprovementPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

RC
RED CROSS
2× · 2017–2018 · $68k · revenue +9%
EG
ELK GROVE YOUTH SOCCER LEAGUE
3× · 2017–2019 · $42k · revenue +76%
LL
LTG LIONS SOFTBALL
3× · 2017–2019 · $25k · revenue +46%

Funded once

TF
TONGAN FELLOWSHIP
one grant, 2017 · $46k
JR
JAMES RUTTER MIDDLE SCHOOL
one grant, 2017 · $25k
CF
COMMUNITY FND OF NAPA VALLEY
one grant, 2017 · $15k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Elk Grove Girls Softball League Inc

17Girls Softball League - Ages 5 - 16 Approx 517 girls.

—

The San Bruno Girls Softball League

Youth sports organization designed to give young girls the opportunity to play softball get trained in order to improve their skills and encourage the development of the qualities of sportsmanship and fair play

—

Santa Monica Girls Fastpitch

Girls youth softball - ages 4 to 14 clinics, practices & games - spring, summer & fall

Recreation & Sports

Silver Bullets Softball Association

Competitive girls softball association - six (6) teams, ages 10-18. expenses include tournament fees, insurance, equipment, and uniforms to play competitive softball.

Recreation & Sports

So Cal Aces Baseball Club

Youth sports

Religion

California Yard Sharks

The goal of the ca yard sharks is to develop and show-case a strong group of team players who show passion for the gane and are willing to work as a team while also putting forth the individual effort necessary to play their best game. we…

Recreation & Sports

So Cal Girls Fastpitch

Our mission is to develop girls with strong core values so they may be successful professionals that conduct themselves with pride and integrity. Our leagues culture develops our female athletes to strive to improve, persevere through…

Youth Development

Nor Cal Legends Fast Pitch Softball

To develop softball excellence and assist young ladies in achieving their goals on the field. providing an environment where players learn sportsmanship, leadership and respect.

Recreation & Sports

Nor Cal Batbusters

Nor Cal Batbusters promoted and provided the student athlete the opportunity to learn and play the game of softball. Resources were dedicated to developing and maintaining basic fundimental skills in players while emphasizing the value of…

Recreation & Sports

Santa Clara County Girls Athletics

Provide young female athletes the opportunity to compete at higher levels for the opportunity to gain recognition by collegiate programs.

—

Newbury Park Girls Softball

To provide an organization in newbury park, california for young girls to compete and learn to play softball in a safe and fun environment

Recreation & Sports

Castro Valley Girls Softball League

This organization is a girls softball league for girls ages 5-18. CVGSL is dedicated to the development of character building, with the goal of teaching the young girls how to deal with different personalities and conflict, as well as how…

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Elk Grove Youth Soccer League and the most unlike its peers is Sweet Adelines International Corporation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 25 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 25% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 5% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

2/40

the rest of the field

11%

1,243/11,218

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

25 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

19/25

Grantees still filing

12/25

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Recreation & Sports$1,777,365Other$1,702,034Education$195,964Human Services$81,952Health$68,913Community Improvement$32,500Youth Development$17,750

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Online Giving Foundation IncDE2.7× affinity7 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation SACRAMENTO CONSOLIDATED CHARITIES funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

1get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%

typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: CALIFORNIA BREEZE SOFTBALL.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

low risk

~36 months of operating runway; revenue contracted over 8 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

8 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 680086395 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on CALIFORNIA BREEZE SOFTBALL, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 36 months of cash on hand.
WatchSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue contracted over the period.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 96% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Sacramento Consolidated Charities?

Find your warmest path to Sacramento Consolidated Charities through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

SACRAMENTO CONSOLIDATED CHARITIES

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

25 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Sacramento Consolidated Charities?

More from the funding graph

SACRAMENTO CONSOLIDATED CHARITIES

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

25 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Sacramento Consolidated Charities?

More from the funding graph