Skip to content

· Private foundation

S&T Ttee Lloyd E Gluck Tr Uw Dtd 032610

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$166k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Animals$893k
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $3k
  • $10k–50k11 grants · $163k
$15,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$2.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HUMANE SOCIETY OF RALEIGH COUNTY$20,000
FOUR FOOTED FRIENDS$20,000
HUMANE ANIMAL RESCUE OF PITTSBURGH$15,000
WHITE OAK ANIMAL SAFE HAVEN INC$15,000
ORPHANS OF THE STORM INC$15,000
INDIANA COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY INC$15,000
ANIMAL FRIENDS$15,000
HUMANE SOCIETY OF WESTMORELAND COUNTY$15,000
PAWS AND PRAYERS PET RESCUE$13,000
MERCER COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY$10,000
PET MATCH RESCUE$10,000
WITH A GOLDEN SPIRIT INC$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 79% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%GENTLE BEN'S GIANT BREED RESCUE: $10k → 9%HUMANE SOCIETY OF WESTMORELAND COUNTY: $15k → 10%HUMANE ANIMAL RESCUE: $15k → 11%HUMANE SOCIETY OF MERCER COUNTY: $13k → 13%ORPHANS OF THE STORM INC: $15k → 13%INDIANA COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $20k → 14%HUMANE SOCIETY OF RALEIGH COUNTY: $20k → 20%MERCER COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY: $11k → 21%GENTLE BEN'S GIANT BREED RESCUE: $10k → 9%HUMANE SOCIETY OF WESTMORELAND COUNTY: $15k → 10%ANIMAL ADVOCATES INC: $15k → 11%HUMANE SOCIETY OF MERCER COUNTY: $10k → 13%ORPHANS OF THE STORM INC: $15k → 13%FOUR FOOTED FRIENDS: $20k → 14%HUMANE SOCIETY OF RALEIGH COUNTY: $15k → 20%MERCER COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY: $10k → 21%HUMANE SOCIETY OF WESTMORELAND COUNTY: $15k → 10%ANIMAL ADVOCATES INC: $12k → 11%ORPHANS OF THE STORM INC: $15k → 13%FOUR FOOTED FRIENDS: $15k → 14%HUMANE SOCIETY OF RALEIGH COUNTY: $12k → 20%HUMANE SOCIETY OF WESTMORELAND COUNTY: $15k → 10%ANIMAL ADVOCATES INC: $12k → 11%ORPHANS OF THE STORM INC: $15k → 13%FOUR FOOTED FRIENDS: $15k → 14%HUMANE SOCIETY OF RALEIGH COUNTY: $12k → 20%HUMANE SOCIETY OF WESTMORELAND COUNTY: $10k → 10%ANIMAL ADVOCATES INC: $12k → 11%ORPHANS OF THE STORM INC: $13k → 13%INDIANA COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $15k → 14%HUMANE SOCIETY OF RALEIGH COUNTY: $11k → 20%HUMANE SOCIETY OF WESTMORELAND COUNTY: $10k → 10%ANIMAL ADVOCATES INC: $12k → 11%FOUR FOOTED FRIENDS: $15k → 14%SOUTHWESTERN PA RETRIEVER RESCUE: $11k → 11%INDIANA COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $12k → 14%WHITE OAK ANIMAL SAFE HAVEN INC: $19k → 11%FOUR FOOTED FRIENDS: $12k → 14%WHITE OAK ANIMAL SAFE HAVEN INC: $17k → 11%FOUR FOOTED FRIENDS: $11k → 14%ANIMAL FRIENDS: $15k → 11%WHITE OAK ANIMAL SAFE HAVEN INC: $16k → 11%ANIMAL FRIENDS: $15k → 11%WHITE OAK ANIMAL SAFE HAVEN INC: $15k → 11%ANIMAL FRIENDS: $15k → 11%WHITE OAK ANIMAL SAFE HAVEN INC: $12k → 11%HUMANE ANIMAL RESCUE OF PITTSBURGH: $20k → 11%HUMANE ANIMAL RESCUE OF PITTSBURGH: $15k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$882k · 17 repeat orgs$11k to everyone else

17 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
1

Total granted

$882k
$11k

Still filing today

76%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WO
    White Oak Animal Safe Haven No Kill Shelter
    6× · 2020–2025 · $89k · revenue +134%
  • FF
    FOUR FOOTED FRIENDS
    6× · 2020–2025 · $88k · revenue +65%
  • OO
    ORPHANS OF THE STORM INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $83k · revenue +118%

Funded once

  • SP
    SOUTHWESTERN PA RETRIEVER RESCUE
    one grant, 2021 · $11k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Humane Society of Union County Inc

The Humane Society of Union County exists to reduce the number of abused, abandoned, and neglected cats and dogs through rescue, rehabilitation, adoption, and spay and neuter.

Animals
2
The Humane Society of Shenandoah County Virginia Inc

Humane treatment of animals

Animals
3
Bartholomew County Humane Society Inc

Humane treatment of stray dogs and cats

Animals
4
Paws and Claws Animal Shelter
Animals
5
Anas Safe Haven Rescue Inc

Animal Welfare

Animals
6
Humane Society of Richland Wilkin Co

To improve the qulity of life for companion animals, to place homeless cats & dogs in suitable homes, & to provide programs to reduce the overpopulation and euthanasia of companion animals.

Animals
7
Raskels Rescue
Animals
8
Wayne County Humane Society
Animals
9
Happy Acres Pet Rescue
Animals
10
Steuben County Humane Society Inc

Welfare and care of animals

Animals
11
Humane Society of Eastern Carolina

to find forever homes for unwanted animals

Animals
12
Humane Society of Monroe County Il

The organization rescues animals and cares for them until they can find them qualified homes.

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Humane Animal Rescue; the most unlike its peers is With a Golden Spirit Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
12/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

White Oak Animal Safe Haven No Kill Shelter: $89,000 · AnimalsWhite Oak Animal Safe Haven No Kill ShelterFOUR FOOTED FRIENDS: $88,000 · AnimalsFOUR FOOTED FRIENDSORPHANS OF THE STORM INC: $83,000 · AnimalsORPHANS OF THE STORM INCHUMANE SOCIETY OF RALEIGH COUNTY INC: $80,000 · AnimalsHUMANE SOCIETY OF RALEIGH COUNTY INCHumane Society Of Westmoreland County: $80,000 · AnimalsHumane Society Of Westmoreland CountyINDIANA COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY: $77,000 · AnimalsINDIANA COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETYAnimal Friends Inc: $64,000 · AnimalsAnimal Friends IncANIMAL ADVOCATES INCORPORATED: $63,000 · AnimalsANIMAL ADVOCATES INCORPORATEDHUMANE ANIMAL RESCUE: $50,000 · AnimalsHUMANE ANIMAL RESCUE+4 more: $76,000 · Animals+4 morePAWS AND PRAYERS PET RESCUE: $47,200 · OtherPAWS AND PRAYERS P…PET MATCH RESCUE: $46,000 · OtherPET MATCH RESCUEGENTLE BENS GIANT BREED RESCUE: $20,000 · OtherGENTLE BENS GIANT …ACTION FOR ANIMALS HUMANE SOCIETY: $19,000 · OtherACTION FOR ANIMALS…SOUTHWESTERN PA RETRIEVER RESCUE: $11,000 · OtherSOUTHWESTERN PA RE…
Animals$750,000Other$143,200

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWhite Oak Animal Safe Haven No Kill Shelter: $89,000 over 6y, 7.4% of budgetFOUR FOOTED FRIENDS: $88,000 over 6y, 4.7% of budgetORPHANS OF THE STORM INC: $83,000 over 6y, 2.6% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF RALEIGH COUNTY INC: $80,000 over 6y, 2.3% of budgetHumane Society Of Westmoreland County: $80,000 over 6y, 2.5% of budgetINDIANA COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY: $77,000 over 6y, 4.2% of budgetAnimal Friends Inc: $64,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetANIMAL ADVOCATES INCORPORATED: $63,000 over 5y, 18% of budgetHUMANE ANIMAL RESCUE: $50,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF MERCER COUNTY INC: $23,000 over 2y, 10% of budgetMERCER COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY: $21,000 over 2y, 15% of budgetANIMAL CARE SANCTUARY: $18,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetWITH A GOLDEN SPIRIT INC: $14,000 over 6y, 3.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds White Oak Animal Safe Haven No Kill Shelter ↗
  • Who funds FOUR FOOTED FRIENDS ↗
  • Who funds ORPHANS OF THE STORM INC ↗
  • Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY OF RALEIGH COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds Humane Society Of Westmoreland County ↗
  • Who funds INDIANA COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds Animal Friends Inc ↗
  • Who funds ANIMAL ADVOCATES INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds HUMANE ANIMAL RESCUE ↗
  • Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY OF MERCER COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds MERCER COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds ANIMAL CARE SANCTUARY ↗
  • Who funds WITH A GOLDEN SPIRIT INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Pittsburgh FoundationPA12.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Pittsburgh Foundation · Network for Good · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization S&T Ttee Lloyd E Gluck Tr Uw Dtd 032610 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from S&T Ttee Lloyd E Gluck Tr Uw Dtd 032610. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on S&T Ttee Lloyd E Gluck Tr Uw Dtd 032610’s filings →

    More from the funding graph