Skip to content

· Private foundation

Ruth & Ralph Friedman Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$25k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Environment$84kArts & Culture$19kHealth$18kEducation$6kCivil Rights$5kRecreation & Sports$3kAnimals$2kYouth Development$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$750
Median grant
5
States reached
$3k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ADIRONDACK LAND TRUST$7,500
ADIRONDACK COUNCIL$6,000
ADIRONDACK MEDICAL CENTER$3,000
NATURAL HISTORY MUSEUM OF THE ADIRONDACKS$2,500
CENTER FOR INQUIRY$1,000
PAUL SMITH'S COLLEGE$1,000
CENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY$1,000
YOUNG CENTER FOR IMMIGRANT CHILDRENS RIGHT$750
CARY INSTITUTE OF ECOSYSTEMS STUDIES$750
ADIRONDACK HISTORICAL MUSEUM$500
ADIRONDACK SKY CENTER & ABSERVATORY$500
ADIRONDACK CENTER FOR LOON CONSERVATION$250
WIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION$250
CENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY$250
ACADEMY OF AMERICAN POETS$150
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 98% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%THE CENTER FOR POLICY EQUITY: $1k → 14%CARY INSTITUTE OF ECOSYSTEMS STUDIES: $750 → 9%ADIRONDACK EXPERIENCE: $500 → 11%ADIRONDACK LAND TRUST: $13k → 13%ADIRONDACK HISTORICAL MUSEUM: $500 → 14%PAUL SMITH'S COLLEGE: $1k → 16%CENTER FOR INQUIRY: $1k → 16%YOUTH CENTER FOR IMMIGRANTS: $1k → 14%THE CENTER FOR POLICY EQUITY: $1k → 14%CARY INSTITUTE OF ECOSYSTEMS STUDIES: $750 → 9%ADIRONDACK LAND TRUST: $8k → 13%ADIRONDACK HISTORICAL MUSEUM: $500 → 14%PAUL SMITH'S COLLEGE: $1k → 16%YOUTH CENTER FOR IMMIGRANTS: $500 → 14%THE CENTER FOR POLICY EQUITY: $1k → 14%CARY INSTITUTE OF ECOSYSTEMS STUDIES: $750 → 9%ADIRONDACK LAND TRUST: $8k → 13%ADIRONDACK HISTORICAL MUSEUM: $500 → 14%PAUL SMITH'S COLLEGE: $1k → 16%YOUNG CENTER FOR IMMIGRANT CHILDRENS RIGHT: $750 → 14%THE CENTER FOR POLICY EQUITY: $1k → 14%ADIRONDACK LAND TRUST: $8k → 13%PAUL SMITH'S COLLEGE: $1k → 16%ADIRONDACK LAND TRUST: $5k → 13%PAUL SMITH'S COLLEGE: $1k → 16%ADIRONDACK LAND TRUST: $5k → 13%PAUL SMITH'S COLLEGE: $1k → 16%ADIRONDACK COUNCIL: $6k → 13%ADIRONDACK MEDICAL CENTER: $3k → 16%ADIRONDACK COUNCIL: $6k → 13%ADIRONDACK MEDICAL CENTER: $3k → 16%ADIRONDACK COUNCIL: $6k → 13%ADIRONDACK MEDICAL CENTER: $3k → 16%ADIRONDACK COUNCIL: $6k → 13%ADIRONDACK MEDICAL CENTER: $3k → 16%ADIRONDACK COUNCIL: $5k → 13%ADIRONDACK MEDICAL CENTER: $3k → 16%ADIRONDACK COUNCIL: $5k → 13%ADIRONDACK MEDICAL CENTER: $3k → 16%ADIRONDACK HISTORICAL MUSEUM: $500 → 13%NATURAL HISTORY MUSEUM OF THE ADIRONDACKS: $3k → 16%NATURAL HISTORY MUSEUM OF THE ADIRONDACKS: $3k → 16%NATURAL HISTORY MUSEUM OF THE ADIRONDACKS: $3k → 16%NATURAL HISTORY MUSEUM OF THE ADIRONDACKS: $3k → 16%NATURAL HISTORY MUSEUM OF THE ADIRONDACKS: $3k → 16%NATURAL HISTORY MUSEUM OF THE ADIRONDACKS: $3k → 16%CARY INSTITUTE OF ECOSYSTEMS STUDIES: $750 → 16%CARY INSTITUTE OF ECOSYSTEMS STUDIES: $750 → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$137k · 16 repeat orgs$2k to everyone else

16 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
1

Total granted

$137k
$500

Still filing today

63%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EnvironmentArts & CultureEducationHealthAnimalsRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AL
    ADIRONDACK LAND TRUST INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $45k · revenue +82%
  • TA
    THE ADIRONDACK COUNCIL INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $34k · revenue +25%
  • AM
    ADIRONDACK MEDICAL CENTER
    6× · 2020–2025 · $18k · revenue +17%

Funded once

  • AE
    ADIRONDACK EXPERIENCE INC
    one grant, 2020 · $500
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Adirondack Mountain Club Inc

Adk is the only non-profit organization in new york state dedicated to the conservation, preservation, and responsible recreational use of the new york state forest preserve and other parks, wild lands, and waters vital to our members and…

Environment
2
The Central New York Land Trust Inc

The central new york land trust seeks to preserve and protect natural areas in order to provide our communities clean water, clean air, wildlife habitat, and a chance to connect with the land.

Environment
3
New York Botanical Garden

The new york botanical garden is a museum of plants and a scientific research center devoted to the study of plants and their uses. it is the garden's mission to improve public understanding of the natural world, horticulture, and the…

Environment
4
Native Plant Trust Inc

The organization's mission is to conserve and promote new england's native plants to ensure healthy, biologically diverse landscapes.

Environment
5
Thompson Park Conservancy Inc

Zoo new york, by example and action, provides knowledge and motivation for conserving nature in new york state through science-based natural and cultural experiences.

Arts & Culture
6
Dutchess Land Conservancy Inc

Dutchess land conservancy (dlc) is dedicated to preserving the scenic, agricultural and environmental resources of dutchess county, new york, and the surrounding area. dlc, as a private non-profit land conservation organization, carries…

Environment
7
Eastern National

Eastern national promotes the public's understanding and support of america's national parks and other public trust partners by providing quality educational experiences, products and services.

Recreation & Sports
8
New York League of Conservation Voters

See schedule onylcv is a non-partisan policy making and political action organization that works to make environmental protection a top priority with elected officials, decision-makers and the voters by evaluating incumbent performance and…

—
9
New York League of Conservation Voters Education Fund

See schedule onylcvef's mission is to educate, engage and empower new yorkers to be effective advocates on behalf of the environment from clean energy and funding for parks, to solid waste and green buildings. first, we educate new yorkers…

Environment
10
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
11
Protect the Adirondacks Inc

Protect is a grassroots, membership organization dedicated to the protection, stewardship and sustainability of the natural environment and human communities of the adirondack park and the new york state forest preserve for current and…

Environment
12
Northeast Wilderness Trust Corporation

Northeast wilderness trust is a regional land trust working to preserve and restore forever-wild landscapes for nature and people in new york, vermont, new hampshire, maine, massachusetts and connecticut.

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Adirondack Council Inc; the most unlike its peers is Paul Smiths College. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
8/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ADIRONDACK LAND TRUST INC: $45,000 · EnvironmentADIRONDACK LAND TRUST INCTHE ADIRONDACK COUNCIL INC: $34,000 · EnvironmentTHE ADIRONDACK COUNCIL INC+1 more: $2,250 · EnvironmentADIRONDACK MEDICAL CENTER: $18,000 · HealthADIRONDACK MED…NATURAL HISTORY MUSEUM OF THE ADIRONDACKS: $16,000 · Arts & CultureNATURAL HISTO…+1 more: $300 · Arts & CultureTHE CENTER FOR POLICY EQUITY: $4,000 · OtherTHE CENTER F…ADIRONDACK HISTORICAL MUSEUM: $2,500 · OtherADIRONDACK H…ADIRONDACK SKY CENTER & ABSERVATORY: $2,000 · OtherADIRONDACK S…YOUTH CENTER FOR IMMIGRANTS: $1,500 · OtherYOUTH CENTER…CARY INSTITUTE OF ECOSYSTEMS STUDIES: $1,500 · OtherCARY INSTITU…CENTER FOR INQUIRY: $1,250 · OtherCENTER FOR I…CENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY: $1,000 · OtherCENTRAL PARK…YOUNG CENTER FOR IMMIGRANT CHILDRENS RIGHT: $750 · OtherADIRONDACK EXPERIENCE INC: $500 · OtherPAUL SMITHS COLLEGE: $6,000 · EducationWIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION INC: $400 · EducationADIRONDACK CENTER FOR LOON CONSERVATION: $2,250 · AnimalsCENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC: $500 · Recreation & Sports
Environment$81,250Health$18,000Arts & Culture$16,300Other$15,000Education$6,400Animals$2,250Recreation & Sports$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetADIRONDACK LAND TRUST INC: $45,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetTHE ADIRONDACK COUNCIL INC: $34,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetADIRONDACK MEDICAL CENTER: $18,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetNATURAL HISTORY MUSEUM OF THE ADIRONDACKS: $16,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetPAUL SMITHS COLLEGE: $6,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetADIRONDACK CENTER FOR LOON CONSERVATION: $2,250 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetCARY INSTITUTE OF ECOSYSTEM STUDIES INC: $2,250 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC: $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION INC: $400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ACADEMY OF AMERICAN POETS INC: $300 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ADIRONDACK LAND TRUST INC ↗
  • Who funds THE ADIRONDACK COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds ADIRONDACK MEDICAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds NATURAL HISTORY MUSEUM OF THE ADIRONDACKS ↗
  • Who funds PAUL SMITHS COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds ADIRONDACK CENTER FOR LOON CONSERVATION ↗
  • Who funds CARY INSTITUTE OF ECOSYSTEM STUDIES INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC ↗
  • Who funds WIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE ACADEMY OF AMERICAN POETS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Vanguard Charitable Endowment ProgramPA8.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ruth & Ralph Friedman Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ruth & Ralph Friedman Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Ruth & Ralph Friedman’s filings →

    More from the funding graph