Skip to content

New York · Private foundation

Ruth & Ralph Friedman Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$25k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
15
Grants FY2025
14
Organizations funded FY2024
36%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2025
$750
Largest grant, FY2025
$7,500
Organizations funded a year
8 to 14
FY2020 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
5
Total assets, FY2025
$3k
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 36% of the organizations Ruth & Ralph Friedman Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 7% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24
EnvironmentRecreation & SportsEducationArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving15$25k13%
FY202414$24k36%
FY202310$23k0%
FY202210$28k10%
FY202110$20k30%
FY20208$19kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Environment$84kArts & Culture$19kHealth$18kEducation$6kCivil Rights$5kRecreation & Sports$3kAnimals$2kYouth Development$2kOther$0

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2020 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 11 grantees
All grantees of Ruth & Ralph Friedman Foundation by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Adirondack Land Trust Inc$45,00060%
The Adirondack Council Inc$34,00060%
Adirondack Medical Center$18,00060%
Natural History Museum of the Adirondacks$16,00060%
Paul Smiths College$6,00060%
Adirondack Center for Loon Conservation$2,25060%
Cary Institute of Ecosystem Studies Inc$2,25030%
Adirondack Experience Inc$5001n/a
Central Park Conservancy Inc$50020%
Wikimedia Foundation Inc$40020%
The Academy of American Poets Inc$30020%

What it could do for these grantees

Plus 8 recipients with no EIN on record ($15k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget Ruth & Ralph Friedman Foundation supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAdirondack Land Trust Inc: $45,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetThe Adirondack Council Inc: $34,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetAdirondack Medical Center: $18,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetNatural History Museum of the Adirondacks: $16,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetPaul Smiths College: $6,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetAdirondack Center for Loon Conservation: $2,250 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetCary Institute of Ecosystem Studies Inc: $2,250 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCentral Park Conservancy Inc: $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWikimedia Foundation Inc: $400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe Academy of American Poets Inc: $300 over 2y, 0.0% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 10.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Vanguard Charitable Endowment ProgramPA8.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Ruth & Ralph Friedman Foundation with peer funders

About Ruth & Ralph Friedman Foundation

How much does Ruth & Ralph Friedman Foundation give?
Ruth & Ralph Friedman Foundation reported 15 grants totaling $25,400 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 8 and 14 organizations a year over FY2020 to FY2024.
What does Ruth & Ralph Friedman Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2020 to FY2025, its largest causes are Environment (60%), Arts & Culture (13%), Health (13%).
Who are Ruth & Ralph Friedman Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2020 to FY2025: Adirondack Land Trust Inc ($45k), The Adirondack Council Inc ($34k), Adirondack Medical Center ($18k).
Does Ruth & Ralph Friedman Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 36% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does Ruth & Ralph Friedman Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as Ruth & Ralph Friedman Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program, Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund, Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc.
Where is Ruth & Ralph Friedman Foundation based?
Ruth & Ralph Friedman Foundation is based in NY.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Ruth & Ralph Friedman’s filings →

More from the funding graph