Skip to content

· Public charity

Russell Westbrook Why Not Foundation Inc

See schedule 0the mission of the foundation is to inspire the lives of childresn, empower them to ask "why not and teach them to never give up.

$1.3M
Granted FY2024still arriving
3
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$1.3M
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Education$3.1MRecreation & Sports$1.5MHousing & Shelter$250kPhilanthropy$100kYouth Development$25kScience & Tech$21kCommunity Improvement$20kFood & Nutrition$20kOther$0
02FY2024 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $41k
  • $250k+1 grant · $1.3M
$21,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$160k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LA PROMISE FUND$1,250,000
CALIFORNIA SCIENCE CENTER FOUNDATION$21,000
DADDY BRUCE RANDOLPH LEGACY FOUNDATION$20,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%REDFLIGHT: $15k → 14%COMP-U-DOPT INC: $100k → 16%OKLAHOMA CITY PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $165k → 16%RELENTLESS CHURCH: $10k → 10%AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $10k → 13%DADDY BRUCE RANDOLPH LEGACY FOUNDATION: $20k → 12%TEAM WHY NOT: $795k → 14%THE MAYOR'S FUND FOR LOS ANGELES: $250k → 14%COMP-U-DOPT INC: $69k → 16%TEAM WHY NOT: $215k → 14%CALIFORNIA SCIENCE CENTER FOUNDATION: $21k → 14%MINORITY SUPPLIER DEVELOPMENT COUNC: $20k → 16%TEAM WHY NOT: $173k → 14%TEAM WHY NOT: $232k → 14%UNITED WAY OF GREATER HOUSTON: $100k → 16%TEAM WHY NOT: $110k → 14%TEAM WHY NOTAAU: $70k → 14%LA PROMISE FUND: $1.3M → 14%LA PROMISE FUND: $500k → 14%LA PROMISE FUND: $500k → 14%LA PROMISE FUND: $500k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.4M · 3 repeat orgs$706k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +286% since the first grant, against -2% for those funded once.

3 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
9

Total granted

$4.4M
$665k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+286%
-2%

Still filing today

100%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $41k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationPhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentHealthCivil RightsArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LP
    LA PROMISE FUND
    4× · 2021–2024 · $2.8M · revenue +54%
  • TW
    TEAM WHY NOT
    5× · 2019–2023 · $1.5M · revenue +474% · 96% of their budget
  • CI
    COMP-U-DOPT INC
    2× · 2020–2021 · $169k · revenue +286%

Funded once

  • TM
    THE MAYOR'S FUND FOR LOS ANGELES
    one grant, 2020 · $250k · revenue -89%
  • OC
    OKLAHOMA CITY PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2022 · $165k · revenue -2%
  • United Way of Greater Houston
    one grant, 2021 · $100k · revenue -16%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Ucla Foundation

The ucla foundation is the giving, receiving, and investing arm of the ucla campus. the foundation enables private donors to help build, sustain and advance one of the world's finest academic and research institutions. private philanthropy…

Education
2
Chicago Public Education Fund

The chicago public education fund (the fund) is a nonprofit organization that improves public schools in chicago by investing in the talented educators who lead them.

Education
3
Partnership for Los Angeles Schools

We transform schools to revolutionize school systems, empowering all students with a high-quality education. the partnership's goals are to 1) dramatically accelerate achievement for students in the district's highest need and historically…

Education
4
California Competes

Established in 2011, our mission is to help transform the state's higher education system into an engine of economic opportunity that empowers all californians, particularly those from underserved communities, to achieve their full…

Education
5
United States Olympic and Paralympic Committee

Empowering the competitive excellence and well-being of team usa athletes, championing the power of sport, and inspiring the nation.

Recreation & Sports
6
Alternative Schools Inc

To help each child reach his/her full potential by cultivating an active village of parents, community members, and stakeholders involved in providing an individual, personal, and conceptual learning environment for each student.

Education
7
Inroads Inc

To deliver innovative leadership development programs and creative solutions that identify, accelerate, and elevate underrepresented talent throughout their careers.

Education
8
Internet Society Foundation

At the internet society foundation, we focus on funding initiatives that strengthen the internet in function and reach so that it can effectively serve all people. our work advances the vision of the internet society (isoc): the internet…

International
9
American Gas Association

American gas association's (the association) mission is to develop and advocate for informed, innovative, and durable policy that fulfills our nation's energy needs, environmental aspirations and economic potential. we are committed to…

—
10
United States Olympic and Paralympic Foundation

To generate philanthropic support for the united states olympic and paralympic committee (usopc). the usopc's mission is: empowering the competitive excellence and well-being of team usa athletes, championing the power of sport, and…

Recreation & Sports
11
Yes Prep Public Schools Inc

YES Prep Public Schools, Inc. prepares low-income youth to enter a four-year college or university by implementing an innovative and rigorous academic program which also emphasizes community service.

Education
12
Youth & Opportunity United Inc

Youth & opportunity united, inc. is a not-for-profit, youth development agency that provides services and leadership to meet the emerging needs of young people and their families in our community. y.o.u. programs are trauma-informed,…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Leadersup; the most unlike its peers is Comp-U-Dopt Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
4/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LA PROMISE FUND: $2,750,000 · EducationLA PROMISE FUNDCOMP-U-DOPT INC: $168,750 · EducationCOMP-U-DOPT INCOKLAHOMA CITY PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION INC: $165,000 · EducationOKLAHOMA CITY PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION INCTEAM WHY NOT: $1,525,000 · OtherTEAM WHY NOTIndividual grant recipient: $70,000 · Other+2 more: $25,000 · OtherTHE MAYOR'S FUND FOR LOS ANGELES: $250,000 · PhilanthropyUnited Way of Greater Houston: $100,000 · PhilanthropyLEADERSUP: $25,000 · Youth DevelopmentCALIFORNIA SCIENCE CENTER FOUNDATION: $21,000 · Arts & CultureHOUSTON BUSINESS COUNCIL INC: $20,000 · Civil RightsDADDY BRUCE RANDOLPH LEGACY FOUNDATION: $20,000 · Food & NutritionAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $10,000 · Health
Education$3,083,750Other$1,620,000Philanthropy$350,000Youth Development$25,000Arts & Culture$21,000Civil Rights$20,000Food & Nutrition$20,000Health$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLA PROMISE FUND: $2,750,000 over 4y, 6.4% of budgetTEAM WHY NOT: $1,525,000 over 5y, 96% of budgetTHE MAYOR'S FUND FOR LOS ANGELES: $250,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCOMP-U-DOPT INC: $168,750 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetOKLAHOMA CITY PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION INC: $165,000 over 1y, 4.7% of budgetUnited Way of Greater Houston: $100,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLEADERSUP: $25,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetCALIFORNIA SCIENCE CENTER FOUNDATION: $21,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOUSTON BUSINESS COUNCIL INC: $20,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA1.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Russell Westbrook Why Not Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Russell Westbrook Why Not Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Russell Westbrook Why Not Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Russell Westbrook Why Not Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Russell Westbrook Why Not’s filings →

    More from the funding graph