Skip to content

· Private foundation

Russell L Cline Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$53k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$13k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$186kEducation$178kReligion$60k
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $40k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $13k
$7,500
Median grant
3
States reached
$308k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MUSKINGUM UNIVERSITY$12,500
JAMESTOWN FRIENDS CHURCH$7,500
ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH$7,500
SHRINERS HOSPITAL OF CIN$7,500
THE CHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER$7,500
UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY$5,000
OHIO UNIVERSITY$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 80% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA: $10k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA: $13k → 17%ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL: $8k → 17%JAMESTOWN FRIENDS CHURCH: $8k → 9%MUSKINGUM UNIVERSITY: $13k → 14%SOUTHERN STATE COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $6k → 15%COLUMBUS STATE COLLEGE: $5k → 15%SHRINERS HOSPITAL OF CIN: $8k → 16%OHIO UNIVERSITY: $5k → 22%UNIVERSITY OF CHIGACO: $11k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA: $10k → 17%ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH: $8k → 17%JAMESTOWN FRIENDS CHURCH: $8k → 9%MUSKINGUM UNIVERSITY: $13k → 14%SHRINERS HOSPITAL OF CINCINNATI: $8k → 16%OHIO UNIVERSITY: $5k → 22%UNIVERSITY OF CHIGACO: $7k → 14%ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL: $8k → 17%JAMESTOWN FRIENDS CHURCH: $8k → 9%MUSKINGUM UNIVERSITY: $13k → 14%THE CHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER: $8k → 14%SHRINERS HOSPITAL OF CINCINNATI: $8k → 16%ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL: $8k → 17%JAMESTOWN FRIENDS CHURCH: $8k → 9%THE CHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER: $8k → 14%SHRINERS HOSPITAL OF CINCINNATI: $8k → 16%ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL: $8k → 17%JAMESTOWN FRIENDS CHURCH: $8k → 9%THE CHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER: $8k → 14%SHRINERS HOSPITAL OF CINCINNATI: $8k → 16%ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL: $8k → 17%JAMESTOWN FRIENDS CHURCH: $8k → 9%THE CHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER: $8k → 14%SHRINERS HOSPITAL OF CINCINNATI: $8k → 16%ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL: $8k → 17%JAMESTOWN FRIENDS CHURCH: $8k → 9%THE CHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER: $8k → 14%SHRINERS HOSPITAL OF CINCINNATI: $8k → 16%ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL: $8k → 17%JAMESTOWN FRIENDS CHURCH: $8k → 9%THE CHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER: $8k → 14%SHRINERS HOSPITAL OF CINCINNATI: $8k → 16%ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL: $8k → 17%JAMESTOWN FRIENDS CHURCH: $8k → 9%THE CHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER: $8k → 14%SHRINERS HOSPITAL OF CINCINNATI: $8k → 16%THE CHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER: $8k → 14%THE CHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER: $8k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
OH
PA
KY
VA
AZ
TN
SC
AL
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$411k · 17 repeat orgs$66k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +81% since the first grant, against +17% for those funded once.

17 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
19

Total granted

$411k
$51k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+81%
+17%

Still filing today

41%
32%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 71% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DC
    DAYTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL
    9× · 2017–2025 · $68k · revenue +140%
  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $60k · revenue +145%
  • MU
    MUSKINGUM UNIVERSITY
    3× · 2023–2025 · $38k · revenue +7%

Funded once

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
  • CS
    COLUMBUS STATE COLLEGE
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
  • KS
    KENT STATE UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2018 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
2
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
3
Trinity University

Trinity university is an independent co-educational university whose mission is excellence in the interrelated areas of teaching, research and services.

Education
4
John Carroll University

As a jesuit catholic university committed to academic rigor, inclusive excellence, and care for the whole person, john carroll university inspires individuals of intellect and character to learn, lead and serve in the community and…

Education
5
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
6
Marietta College

Marietta college (mc) provides a strong foundation for a lifetime of leadership, critical thinking, and problem solving. we achieve this mission by offering undergraduates a contemporary liberal arts education and graduate students an…

Education
7
Saint Xavier University

Saint xavier university, a catholic institution inspired by the heritage of the sisters of mercy, educates persons to search for truth, think critically, communicate effectively and serve wisely and compassionately in support of human…

Education
8
Albright College

As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.

Education
9
Seton Hall University

Seton hall university is a catholic institution of higher education

—
10
Capital University

Capital university transforms lives by empowering an inclusive community of learners through engaging academic, co-curricular, and professional experiences.

Education
11
Delaware Valley University

See schedule o.we are inspired by the ideals of our founder who, in 1896, emphasized respect for all people and ideas, who honored knowledge with practice, progress and the common good. our historical commitment to experiential learning…

—
12
Wilson College

Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Muskingum University; the most unlike its peers is New York Institute of Technology. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
11/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

JAMESTOWN FRIENDS CHURCH: $67,500 · OtherJAMESTOWN FRIENDS CHURCHSHRINERS HOSPITAL OF CINCINNATI: $60,000 · OtherSHRINERS HOSPITAL OF CINCINNATIUNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA: $22,500 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF ALABAMAUNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI: $14,508 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATIOHIO UNIVERSITY: $12,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA: $10,000 · Other+21 more: $82,467 · Other+21 moreDAYTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $67,500 · HealthDAYTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITALST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $60,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOS…+1 more: $4,025 · HealthMUSKINGUM UNIVERSITY: $37,500 · EducationMUSKINGUM UNIVERSI…University of Chicago: $17,500 · EducationUniversity of Chic…Wilmington College: $9,500 · EducationWilmington CollegeCedarville University: $6,000 · EducationCedarville Univers…+4 more: $6,000 · Education+4 more
Other$268,975Health$131,525Education$76,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDAYTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $67,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $60,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetMUSKINGUM UNIVERSITY: $37,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Chicago: $17,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWilmington College: $9,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCedarville University: $6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetKETTERING MEDICAL CENTER: $4,025 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCarnegie Mellon University: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOHIO CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMOUNT CARMEL COLLEGE OF NURSING: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCENTRE COLLEGE: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEW YORK INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLIBERTY UNIVERSITY INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DAYTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds MUSKINGUM UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds University of Chicago ↗
  • Who funds Wilmington College ↗
  • Who funds Cedarville University ↗
  • Who funds KETTERING MEDICAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Carnegie Mellon University ↗
  • Who funds OHIO CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds MOUNT CARMEL COLLEGE OF NURSING ↗
  • Who funds CENTRE COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds NEW YORK INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY ↗
  • Who funds LIBERTY UNIVERSITY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Columbus FoundationOH13× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Columbus Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Russell L Cline Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Russell L Cline Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 38 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Russell L Cline’s filings →

    More from the funding graph