Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Russell L Cline Charitable Trust

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$53k
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$13k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Health$186kEducation$178kReligion$60k
02FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k7 grants · $40k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $13k
$7,500
Median grant
2
States reached
$360k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MUSKINGUM UNIVERSITY$12,500
SHRINERS HOSPITAL OF CINCINNATI$7,500
ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL$7,500
THE CHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER$7,500
JAMESTOWN FRIENDS CHURCH$7,500
OHIO UNIVERSITY$5,000
Individual grant recipient$3,000
WILMINGTON COLLEGE$2,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 80% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA: $10k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA: $13k → 17%ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL: $8k → 17%JAMESTOWN FRIENDS CHURCH: $8k → 9%MIAMI UNIVERSITY: $4k → 12%WILMINGTON COLLEGE: $4k → 12%KENT STATE UNIVERSITY: $5k → 12%MUSKINGUM UNIVERSITY: $13k → 14%SOUTHERN STATE COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $6k → 15%COLUMBUS STATE COLLEGE: $5k → 15%SHRINERS HOSPITAL OF CINCINNATI: $8k → 16%OHIO UNIVERSITY: $5k → 22%UNIVERSITY OF CHIGACO: $11k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA: $10k → 17%ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL: $8k → 17%JAMESTOWN FRIENDS CHURCH: $8k → 9%WILMINGTON COLLEGE: $4k → 12%MUSKINGUM UNIVERSITY: $13k → 14%SHRINERS HOSPITAL OF CINCINNATI: $8k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF CHIGACO: $7k → 14%ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL: $8k → 17%JAMESTOWN FRIENDS CHURCH: $8k → 9%THE CHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER: $8k → 14%THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY: $4k → 15%SHRINERS HOSPITAL OF CINCINNATI: $8k → 16%ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL: $8k → 17%JAMESTOWN FRIENDS CHURCH: $8k → 9%THE CHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER: $8k → 14%SHRINERS HOSPITAL OF CINCINNATI: $8k → 16%ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL: $8k → 17%JAMESTOWN FRIENDS CHURCH: $8k → 9%THE CHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER: $8k → 14%SHRINERS HOSPITAL OF CINCINNATI: $8k → 16%ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL: $8k → 17%JAMESTOWN FRIENDS CHURCH: $8k → 9%THE CHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER: $8k → 14%SHRINERS HOSPITAL OF CINCINNATI: $8k → 16%ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL: $8k → 17%JAMESTOWN FRIENDS CHURCH: $8k → 9%THE CHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER: $8k → 14%SHRINERS HOSPITAL OF CINCINNATI: $8k → 16%ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL: $8k → 17%JAMESTOWN FRIENDS CHURCH: $8k → 9%THE CHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER: $8k → 14%SHRINERS HOSPITAL OF CINCINNATI: $8k → 16%WRIGHT STATE UNIVERSITY: $4k → 9%THE CHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER: $8k → 14%THE CHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER: $8k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
NY
OH
PA
KY
VA
AZ
TN
SC
AL
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$373k · 16 repeat orgs$52k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +81% since the first grant, against +17% for the ones you funded once.

16 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
19

Total granted

$373k
$49k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+81%
+17%

Still filing today

44%
32%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $60k · revenue +145%
  • DC
    DAYTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL
    8× · 2017–2024 · $60k · revenue +140%
  • MU
    MUSKINGUM UNIVERSITY
    2× · 2023–2024 · $25k · revenue +7%

Funded once

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
  • CS
    COLUMBUS STATE COLLEGE
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
  • KS
    KENT STATE UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2018 · $5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
2
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
3
Trinity University

Trinity university is an independent co-educational university whose mission is excellence in the interrelated areas of teaching, research and services.

Education
4
John Carroll University

As a jesuit catholic university committed to academic rigor, inclusive excellence, and care for the whole person, john carroll university inspires individuals of intellect and character to learn, lead and serve in the community and…

Education
5
Marietta College

Marietta college (mc) provides a strong foundation for a lifetime of leadership, critical thinking, and problem solving. we achieve this mission by offering undergraduates a contemporary liberal arts education and graduate students an…

Education
6
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
7
Albright College

As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.

Education
8
Seton Hall University

Seton hall university is a catholic institution of higher education

9
Saint Xavier University

Saint xavier university, a catholic institution inspired by the heritage of the sisters of mercy, educates persons to search for truth, think critically, communicate effectively and serve wisely and compassionately in support of human…

Education
10
Dickinson College

Dickinson college provides a useful, innovative and interdisciplinary education in the liberal arts and sciences to prepare students to lead rich and fulfilling lives of engaged global citizenship

Education
11
Capital University

Capital university transforms lives by empowering an inclusive community of learners through engaging academic, co-curricular, and professional experiences.

Education
12
Mcdaniel College Inc

Mcdaniel college is a diverse student-centered community committed to excellence in the liberal arts & sciences and professional studies with careful mentoring and attention to the individual. mcdaniel changes lives. we challenge students…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Muskingum University and the most unlike its peers is New York Institute of Technology. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
11/13
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

JAMESTOWN FRIENDS CHURCH — $60,000 · OtherJAMESTOWN FRIENDS CHURCHSHRINERS HOSPITAL OF CINCINNATI — $60,000 · OtherSHRINERS HOSPITAL OF CINCINNATIUNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA — $22,500 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF ALABAMAUNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI — $14,508 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATIUNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA — $10,000 · OtherSOUTHERN STATE COMM COLLEGE — $8,800 · Other+19 more — $60,667 · Other+19 moreST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $60,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPI…DAYTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL — $60,000 · HealthDAYTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL+1 more — $4,025 · HealthMUSKINGUM UNIVERSITY — $25,000 · EducationMUSKINGUM UNIVERS…University of Chicago — $17,500 · EducationUniversity of Chi…Wilmington College — $9,500 · EducationWilmington Colleg…Cedarville University — $6,000 · EducationCedarville Univer…+4 more — $6,000 · Education+4 more
Other$236,475Health$124,025Education$64,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $60,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetDAYTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL — $60,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetMUSKINGUM UNIVERSITY — $25,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Chicago — $17,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWilmington College — $9,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCedarville University — $6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetKETTERING MEDICAL CENTER — $4,025 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCarnegie Mellon University — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCENTRE COLLEGE — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMOUNT CARMEL COLLEGE OF NURSING — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOHIO CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLIBERTY UNIVERSITY INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEW YORK INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
  • Who funds DAYTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL
  • Who funds MUSKINGUM UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds University of Chicago
  • Who funds Wilmington College
  • Who funds Cedarville University
  • Who funds KETTERING MEDICAL CENTER
  • Who funds Carnegie Mellon University
  • Who funds CENTRE COLLEGE
  • Who funds MOUNT CARMEL COLLEGE OF NURSING
  • Who funds OHIO CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds LIBERTY UNIVERSITY INC
  • Who funds NEW YORK INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Columbus FoundationOH13× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Columbus Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Russell L Cline Charitable Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 36 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph