Skip to content

Illinois · Private foundation

Russell & Katherine Hawken Foundation

Its FY2019 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$45k
Granted FY2018
9
Grants FY2018
9
Organizations funded FY2018
22%
First-time grantees FY2018
Read the full brief

Read this first · the figures below need context

100% of Russell & Katherine Hawken Foundation’s FY2019 grant dollars went to The Chicago Community Trust, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2019 names 1 organization directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2018, the last year Russell & Katherine Hawken Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 7 organizations, $45k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

6
’17
7
’18
1
’19

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

Median grant, FY2018
$1,000
Largest grant, FY2018
$20,000
Organizations funded a year
9 to 9
FY2017 to FY2018
States reached, FY2018
4
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2018, 22% of the organizations Russell & Katherine Hawken Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 3% of its grant dollars.

The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY20189$45k22%
FY20179$39kn/a
85% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2019.

Philanthropy$989kHealth$80kEducation$3kReligion$2kAnimals$1kOther$0

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2019, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Plus 3 recipients with no EIN on record ($22k), not named here.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Russell & Katherine Hawken Foundation with peer funders

About Russell & Katherine Hawken Foundation

How much does Russell & Katherine Hawken Foundation give?
Russell & Katherine Hawken Foundation reported 9 grants totaling $44,500 in its FY2018 IRS filing. It funded between 9 and 9 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2018.
What does Russell & Katherine Hawken Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2019, its largest causes are Philanthropy (92%), Health (7%), Education (0%).
Who are Russell & Katherine Hawken Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2019: Marc Lustgarten Pancreatic Cancer Foundation ($41k), Boca Grande Health Clinic Inc ($12k), Pancreatic Cancer Action Network Inc ($7k).
Does Russell & Katherine Hawken Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2018, 22% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does Russell & Katherine Hawken Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as Russell & Katherine Hawken Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Amazonsmile Foundation.
Where is Russell & Katherine Hawken Foundation based?
Russell & Katherine Hawken Foundation is based in IL.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2018, released 2018. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Russell & Katherine Hawken’s filings →

More from the funding graph