Skip to content

· Private foundation

Ruffo Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$331k
Granted FY2025still arriving
36
Grants FY2025still arriving
10
States reached
$88k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Education$448kAnimals$176kArts & Culture$150kPhilanthropy$130kHealth$115kEnvironment$45kInternational$39kCrime & Legal$28kOther$0
02FY2025 · 36 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k29 grants · $99k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $94k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $138k
$3,000
Median grant
10
States reached
$3.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
RACINE ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY$88,000
THE PRAIRIE SCHOOL$50,000
MOUNT HOLYOKE COLLEGE$27,000
RACINE ART MUSEUM ASSOCIATION$22,000
CORNELL UNIVERSITY$20,000
RACINE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$15,000
UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION$10,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF WISCONSIN INC$7,500
SUSAN G KOMEN CANCER FOUNDATION INC$6,000
FOUNDATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF HUMAN SYSTEMS$6,000
RACINE COUNTY FOOD BANK$4,500
V FOUNDATION FOR CANCER RESEARCH$4,500
NATIONAL RESOURCE DEFENSE COUNCIL$4,500
UNITED WAY OF RACINE COUNTY$4,500
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$4,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $29k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%NORTHAMPTON SURVIVAL CENTER: $1k → 12%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $3k → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $3k → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $3k → 14%VETERAN'S OUTREACH OF WISCONSIN: $3k → 10%VETERAN'S OUTREACH OF WISCONSIN: $3k → 10%VETERAN'S OUTREACH OF WISCONSIN: $3k → 10%VETERAN'S OUTREACH OF WISCONSIN: $2k → 10%VETERAN'S OUTREACH OF WISCONSIN: $500 → 10%VETERAN'S OUTREACH OF WISCONSIN: $500 → 10%HOMELESS ASSISTANCE LEADERSHIP ORGANIZATION INC: $2k → 10%HOMELESS ASSISTANCE LEADERSHIP ORGANIZATION INC: $2k → 10%HOMELESS ASSISTANCE LEADERSHIP ORGANIZATION INC: $2k → 10%HOMELESS ASSISTANCE LEADERSHIP ORGANIZATION INC: $1k → 10%HOMELESS ASSISTANCE LEADERSHIP ORGANIZATION INC: $600 → 10%HOMELESS ASSISTANCE LEADERSHIP ORGANIZATION INC: $600 → 10%HOMELESS ASSISTANCE LEADERSHIP ORGANIZATION INC: $600 → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
WA
WI
NY
MA
PA
CA
VA
KS
NC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.1M · 31 repeat orgs$41k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +23% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

31 repeat relationships: 28 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

31
4

Total granted

$1.1M
$25k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+23%
0%

Still filing today

87%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $16k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthHuman ServicesArts & CultureEnvironmentAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TP
    THE PRAIRIE SCHOOL INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $254k · revenue +7%
  • Cornell University
    5× · 2021–2025 · $76k · revenue +23%
  • THE TRUSTEES OF MOUNT HOLYOKE COLLEGE
    5× · 2019–2025 · $64k · revenue +11%

Funded once

  • RA
    RACINE ART MUSEUM
    one grant, 2023 · $22k
  • AO
    ALLIANCE ON MENTAL ILLNESS OF RACINE COUNTY INC
    one grant, 2022 · $2k · revenue +2%
  • CA
    CHARLES ALLIS AND VILLA TERRACE MUSEUMS INC
    one grant, 2024 · $1k · revenue 0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Uwm Research Foundation Inc

Support research and innovation at the university of wisconsin - milwaukee by providing reserach funding, entrepreneurship support, and by engaging in corporate partnering activities to that end.

Community Improvement
2
Wisconsin Medical Society Inc

To improve the health of the people of wisconsin by supporting and strengthening physicians' ability to practice high quality patient care in a changing environment.

—
3
Wisconsin Association of Health Plans Inc

Promote a positive state legislative and regulatory climate for wisconsin's community health plans. the association communicates with regulatory agencies to promote issue positions representing community health plans.

—
4
Wisconsin Policy Forum Inc

We conduct impartial public policy research and analysis to drive informed debate and effective decision-making in the state of wisconsin.

Public Benefit
5
Milwaukee Women Inc

Milwaukee women inc is an organization of executives determined to change the quality and composition of corporate boards to maximize the performance of public and private companies with a focus on women and women of color.

Education
6
The Uwm Foundation Inc

The mission of the uwm foundation, inc. is to support the educational, literary, and scientific endeavors of the university of wisconsin-milwaukee by receiving, managing, and distributing gifts to benefit the university's students,…

Education
7
The Medical College of Wisconsin Inc

The medical college of wisconsin (mcw) is a distinguished leader and innovator in the education and development of the next generation of physicians, (continued in schedule o)

Education
8
Reedsburg Area Medical Center

Reedsburg area medical center, always there, going beyond the expected to provide compassionate, quality, and efficient health care.

Health
9
Racine County Opportunity Center

Our focus is on making shortterm investments which will significantly improve the longterm wellbeing of our clients. we will measure our performance against these standards by continuously communicating with our clients, and will take…

Human Services
10
Community Care Health Plan Inc

Community care health plan's mission is to develop and demonstrate innovative, flexible, community-based approaches to care for at-risk adults, in order to optimize their quality of life and optimize the allocation of community resources.

Health
11
Wisconsin Nurses Association Incorporated

The wisconsin nurses association advocates for policies that positively impact the nursing workforce. the association also supports workplace standards that promoted safe patient and nursing care.the association advocated for full practice…

—
12
Randolph College Inc

See detailed description of organization's primary mission provided on schedule o

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Way of Racine County Inc; the most unlike its peers is Root-Pike Watershed Initiative Network Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

34 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 34 of the 43 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
34/34
Grantees still filing
26/34
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE PRAIRIE SCHOOL INC: $253,870 · EducationTHE PRAIRIE SCHOOL INCCornell University: $76,000 · EducationCornell UniversityTHE TRUSTEES OF MOUNT HOLYOKE COLLEGE: $63,500 · EducationTHE TRUSTEES OF MOUNT HOLYOKE COLLEGEUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION: $42,500 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATIONHER JUSTICE INC: $16,500 · EducationRACINE ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY INC: $162,500 · AnimalsRACINE ZOOLOGICA…WISCONSIN HUMANE SOCIETY: $13,000 · AnimalsWISCONSIN HUMANE…RACINE ART MUSEUM ASSOCIATION INC: $125,000 · Arts & CultureRACINE ART …+2 more: $2,000 · Arts & CultureRACINE ART MUSEUM: $22,000 · OtherRACINE ART MUSEUMRACINE COUNTY PROJECT EMERGENCY INC: $18,500 · OtherRACINE COUNTY PROJECT…HOPES CENTER OF RACINE INC: $13,000 · OtherHOPES CENTER OF RACIN…Individual grant recipient: $12,500 · OtherIndividual grant reci…SAMUEL CURTIS JOHNSON GRADUATE SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT: $12,000 · OtherCHILDREN'S WISCONSIN FOUNDATION: $11,000 · OtherFOUNDATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF HUMAN SYSTEMS: $11,000 · OtherMOUNT HOLYOKE FUND: $9,000 · OtherCAMFED USA FOUNDATION: $19,500 · OtherCAMFED USA FOUNDATIONMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $19,500 · OtherMEDECINS SANS FRONTIE…WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $12,500 · OtherWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJE…Veterans Outreach of Wisconsin: $12,000 · OtherBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF KENOSHA INC: $13,000 · OtherBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB O…NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUC FUND INC: $12,000 · OtherTHE NATIONAL CENTER FOR MISSING AND EXPLOITED CHILDREN: $11,000 · Other+8 more: $24,300 · Other+8 moreRACINE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $85,100 · PhilanthropyRACINE COM…UNITED WAY OF RACINE COUNTY INC: $26,700 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY…PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF WISCONSIN INC: $30,500 · HealthTHE V FOUNDATION: $22,500 · HealthThe Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc: $22,000 · HealthHEALTH CARE NETWORK INC: $12,500 · Health+1 more: $200 · HealthNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $22,500 · EnvironmentRIVER BEND NATURE CENTER INC: $11,500 · EnvironmentROOT-PIKE WATERSHED INITIATIVE NETWORK INC: $11,000 · Environment
Education$452,370Animals$175,500Arts & Culture$127,000Other$232,800Philanthropy$111,800Health$87,700Environment$45,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE PRAIRIE SCHOOL INC: $253,870 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetRACINE ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY INC: $162,500 over 7y, 1.8% of budgetRACINE ART MUSEUM ASSOCIATION INC: $125,000 over 6y, 1.4% of budgetRACINE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $85,100 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetCornell University: $76,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF MOUNT HOLYOKE COLLEGE: $63,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION: $42,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF WISCONSIN INC: $30,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF RACINE COUNTY INC: $26,700 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $22,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE V FOUNDATION: $22,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetThe Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc: $22,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCAMFED USA FOUNDATION: $19,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $19,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetRACINE COUNTY PROJECT EMERGENCY INC: $18,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetHER JUSTICE INC: $16,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetHOPES CENTER OF RACINE INC: $13,000 over 7y, 0.6% of budgetWISCONSIN HUMANE SOCIETY: $13,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF KENOSHA INC: $13,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $12,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetHEALTH CARE NETWORK INC: $12,500 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetNAACP LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUC FUND INC: $12,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetVeterans Outreach of Wisconsin: $12,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetRIVER BEND NATURE CENTER INC: $11,500 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetROOT-PIKE WATERSHED INITIATIVE NETWORK INC: $11,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetTHE NATIONAL CENTER FOR MISSING AND EXPLOITED CHILDREN: $11,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF HUMAN SYSTEMS: $11,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetHOMELESS ASSISTANCE LEADERSHIP ORGANIZATION INC: $7,300 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetALLIANCE ON MENTAL ILLNESS OF RACINE COUNTY INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetCHARLES ALLIS AND VILLA TERRACE MUSEUMS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRacine Arts Council Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetNORTHAMPTON SURVIVAL CENTER INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDEMENTIA SOCIETY INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE PRAIRIE SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds RACINE ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds RACINE ART MUSEUM ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds RACINE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Cornell University ↗
  • Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF MOUNT HOLYOKE COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF WISCONSIN INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF RACINE COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds THE V FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds CAMFED USA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds RACINE COUNTY PROJECT EMERGENCY INC ↗
  • Who funds HER JUSTICE INC ↗
  • Who funds HOPES CENTER OF RACINE INC ↗
  • Who funds WISCONSIN HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF KENOSHA INC ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds HEALTH CARE NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUC FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds Veterans Outreach of Wisconsin ↗
  • Who funds RIVER BEND NATURE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds ROOT-PIKE WATERSHED INITIATIVE NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds THE NATIONAL CENTER FOR MISSING AND EXPLOITED CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds FOUNDATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF HUMAN SYSTEMS ↗
  • Who funds HOMELESS ASSISTANCE LEADERSHIP ORGANIZATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ALLIANCE ON MENTAL ILLNESS OF RACINE COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds CHARLES ALLIS AND VILLA TERRACE MUSEUMS INC ↗
  • Who funds Racine Arts Council Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Racine Community Foundation IncWI28.3× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Racine Community Foundation Inc · Baird Foundation Inc · Lang Family Foundation Inc · The Johnson Foundation Inc · Johnson Family Foundation · United Way of Racine County Inc · Herbert H Kohl Charities Inc · AbbVie Foundation · Greater Milwaukee Foundation Inc · Green Bay Packers Foundation · Ascension All Saints Hospital Foundation Inc · Educators Credit Union

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ruffo Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ruffo Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Northampton Survival Center Inc: 3% of income from government
  • The Trustees of Mount Holyoke College: 1% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
12report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Ruffo Family Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Ruffo Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 43 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Ruffo Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph