Skip to content

· Private foundation

Rudge Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$154k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$60k
Largest
01What it funds
0186% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Religion$373kEducation$303kPhilanthropy$60kRecreation & Sports$12kHousing & Shelter$5kHuman Services$3kHealth$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $16k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $78k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $60k
$10,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SUN LAKES METHODIST CHURCH$60,000
ALUMNI ASSOCIATION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA$20,000
ECOLINT-AMERICAN FOUNDATION$20,000
POSITIVE PATHS$17,500
TIFFANY FOUNDATION - TIFFANY FUND$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY$5,000
SNOWMASS CHAPEL$5,000
SPECTRUM AFFORDABLE HOUSING CORPORATION$5,000
RIVERBRIDGE REGIONAL CENTER$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 91% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%POSITIVE PATHS: $25k → 11%WHISPERING HOPE RANCH FOUNDATION: $10k → 19%BUCKNELL UNIVERSITY: $10k → 11%SPECTRUM AFFORDABLE HOUSING CORPORATION: $5k → 10%ECOLINT-AMERICAN FOUNDATION: $20k → 5%ADVENTURES IN MISSIONS: $5k → 17%SAMARITAN'S PURSE GRANT: $6k → 21%SNOWMASS CHAPEL: $5k → 6%ALUMNI ASSOCIATION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA: $20k → 8%JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $5k → 19%POSITIVE PATHS: $18k → 11%BUCKNELL UNIVERSITY SCHOLARSHIP FUND: $5k → 11%ECOLINT-AMERICAN FOUNDATION: $5k → 5%SNOWMASS CHAPEL: $5k → 6%ALUMNI ASSOCIATION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA: $20k → 8%POSITIVE PATHS: $15k → 11%BUCKNELL UNIVERSITY SCHOLARSHIP FUND: $5k → 11%SNOWMASS CHAPEL: $5k → 6%ALUMNI ASSOCIATION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA: $20k → 8%POSITIVE PATHS: $15k → 11%BUCKNELL UNIVERSITY IFFERT SCHOLARSHIP: $5k → 11%SNOWMASS CHAPEL: $5k → 6%ALUMNI ASSOCIATION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA: $20k → 8%POSITIVE PATHS: $15k → 11%BUCKNELL UNIVERSITY IFFERT SCHOLARSHIP: $5k → 11%ROARING FORK SCHOOL DISTRICT: $20k → 6%ALUMNI ASSOCIATION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA: $20k → 8%POSITIVE PATHS: $15k → 11%SNOWMASS CHAPEL: $5k → 6%ALUMNI ASSOCIATION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA: $20k → 8%SUN LAKES METHODIST CHURCH: $60k → 11%SUN LAKES METHODIST CHURCH: $60k → 11%SUN LAKES METHODIST CHURCH: $60k → 11%SUN LAKES METHODIST CHURCH: $60k → 11%SUN LAKES METHODIST CHURCH: $53k → 11%SUN LAKES METHODIST CHURCH: $50k → 11%SUN LAKES ROTARY: $10k → 11%TIFFANY FOUNDATION - TIFFANY FUND: $10k → 11%TIFFANY FOUNDATION - TIFFANY FUND: $10k → 11%TIFFANY FOUNDATION - TIFFANY FUND: $10k → 11%SUN LAKES ROTARY: $10k → 11%TIFFANY FOUNDATION - TIFFANY FUND: $10k → 11%SUN LAKES ROTARY: $10k → 11%SUN LAKES ROTARY: $10k → 11%SUN LAKES ROTARY: $10k → 11%TIFFANY FOUNDATION - TIFFANY FUND: $10k → 11%SUN LAKES ROTARY: $10k → 11%TIFFANY FOUNDATION - TIFFANY FUND: $10k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

PA
CA
CO
VA
MD
AZ
NC
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$756k · 9 repeat orgs$67k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
7

Total granted

$756k
$56k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+28%

Still filing today

33%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $11k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SL
    SUN LAKES METHODIST CHURCH
    6× · 2020–2025 · $343k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA ALUMNI ASSOCIATION
    6× · 2020–2025 · $120k · revenue -55%
  • PP
    POSITIVE PATHS
    6× · 2020–2025 · $103k · revenue +258%

Funded once

  • FR
    FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER OF THE ROARING FORK SCHOOLS
    one grant, 2021 · $20k
  • TW
    THE WHISPERING HOPE RANCH FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue -95%
  • Bucknell Universitygraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +28%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
2
University of Virginia Investment Management Company

The university of virginia investment management company (uvimco) is organized to invest funds on behalf of the rector and visitors of the university of virginia (the university or uva) and university-associated organizations (uaos).

Education
3
Delaware Valley University

See schedule o.we are inspired by the ideals of our founder who, in 1896, emphasized respect for all people and ideas, who honored knowledge with practice, progress and the common good. our historical commitment to experiential learning…

—
4
Ashland University

Ashland university, guided by our christian heritage, is a comprehensive, private university that provides a transformative learning experience, shaping graduates who work, serve and lead with integrity in their local, national, and global…

Education
5
Vanderbilt University

See Disclosure Above.

Education
6
Harvard Club of Washington Dc

To inform and enrich the intellectual lives of 20,000 alumni of harvard university in the washington, dc area and to assist harvard university with respect to applicants and undergraduates from the dc area.

Education
7
Washington University of Virginia

Provides seminary, under-graduate, graduate, doctoral, and other continuing education programs

—
8
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
9
Aacsb International - the Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business

Aacsb international provides quality assurance of business school programs, the latest in business education intelligence, thought leadership, and learning and development services.

Education
10
Pacific University

A diverse and sustainable learning community dedicated to discovery and excellence in teaching, scholarship and practice, pacific university inspires students to think, care, create and pursue justice in our world.

Education
11
Augustana University Association

Inspired by lutheran scholarly tradition and the liberal arts, augustana provides an education of enduring worth that challenges the intellect, fosters integrity and integrates faith with learning and service in a diverse world.

Education
12
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of Virginia Alumni Association; the most unlike its peers is Ecolint-American Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
3/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SUN LAKES METHODIST CHURCH: $343,000 · OtherSUN LAKES METHODIST CHURCHTIFFANY FOUNDATION - TIFFANY FUND: $60,000 · OtherTIFFANY FOUNDATION - TIFFANY FUNDIndividual grant recipient: $60,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientEcolint-American Foundation Inc: $25,000 · OtherSNOWMASS CHAPEL: $25,000 · OtherFAMILY RESOURCE CENTER OF THE ROARING FORK SCHOOLS: $20,000 · Other+8 more: $51,000 · Other+8 moreUNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA ALUMNI ASSOCIATION: $120,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA ALUMNI AS…POSITIVE PATHS: $102,500 · EducationPOSITIVE PATHSBucknell University: $10,000 · Education+1 more: $5,000 · EducationRIVER BRIDGE REGIONAL CENTER INC: $1,000 · Health
Other$584,000Education$237,500Health$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA ALUMNI ASSOCIATION: $120,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetPOSITIVE PATHS: $102,500 over 6y, 22% of budgetEcolint-American Foundation Inc: $25,000 over 2y, 4.2% of budgetBucknell University: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVALLEY BLOOM: $3,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetRIVER BRIDGE REGIONAL CENTER INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA ALUMNI ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds POSITIVE PATHS ↗
  • Who funds Ecolint-American Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE WHISPERING HOPE RANCH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Bucknell University ↗
  • Who funds JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds VALLEY BLOOM ↗
  • Who funds RIVER BRIDGE REGIONAL CENTER INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Online Giving Foundation IncDE7.2× affinity5 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Rudge Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Rudge Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 13%
  • Johns Hopkins University: 13% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Rudge’s filings →

More from the funding graph