Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Rowe Family Foundation Inc Co James C Rowe

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$28k
Granted FY2020
21
Grants FY2020
4
States reached
$11k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

75% of Rowe Family Foundation Inc Co James C Rowe’s FY2024 grant dollars went to Yampa Valley Community Foundation, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 10 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2020, the last year Rowe Family Foundation Inc Co James C Rowe named its own grantees at scale: 14 organizations, $28k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

14
20
12
21
14
22
11
23
10
24

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What you fund
0192% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY20202024.

Philanthropy$577kEducation$91kArts & Culture$11kAnimals$10kHealth$9kHuman Services$3kPublic Safety & Disaster$2kFood & Nutrition$2kCrime & Legal$2kOther$58k
02FY2020 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2020

  • Under $10k20 grants · $17k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $11k
$500
Median grant
4
States reached
$3.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MILWAUKEE COLLEGE PREP$11,200
FOURTH CHURCH OF CHRIST SCIENTIST$3,000
MILKWORKS$2,000
FRIENDS OF MONTESSORI CHILDRENS ROO$2,000
UNITED WAY$1,200
YAMPA VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$1,000
UNITED COMMUNITY CENTER INC$1,000
CHRISTIAN SCIENCE SOCIETY$1,000
LEFTHAND FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT$1,000
AMVETS$500
SHOREWOOD SEED FOUNDATION$500
DRYLANDS AGROECOLOGY RESEARCH FOUND$500
FRIENDS OF STEAMBOAT LAKE STATE PAR$500
MILWAUKEE PUBLIC MUSEUM INC$500
COLLEGE POSSIBLE$500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%COLLECTIVE FOR HOPE: $1k → 12%UNITED COMMUNITY CENTER: $1k → 17%UNITED COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $1k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MN
WI
MA
CT
CO
NE
OK
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

76%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$145k · 19 repeat orgs$45k to everyone else

19 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2020, 10 since wound down; 35 grantees were first funded in FY2020 (too recent to call). Read against FY2020, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
35

Total granted

$145k
$45k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
+36%

Still filing today

63%
46%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
EducationArts & CultureHuman ServicesAnimalsHealthFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MS
    MCPREPARATORY SCHOOL OF WISCONSIN INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $32k · revenue +21%
  • ALL-IN MILWAUKEE INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $20k · revenue +245%
  • OZ
    OMAHA ZOO FOUNDATION
    5× · 2020–2024 · $10k · revenue +34%

Funded once

  • AA
    ACTON ACADEMYgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $14k · revenue +31%
  • UW
    UNITED WAY OF THE YAMPA VALLEYgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue +33%
  • HUNGER TASK FORCE INC
    one grant, 2021 · $4k · revenue -29%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The University School of Milwaukee Corporation

University school of milwaukee cultivates excellence in learning, leadership, and citizenship for prekindergarten through 12th grade students. students are engaged, known, and valued within our passionate independent school community…

Education
2
Woodlands School Inc

Woodlands school, inc. is a public charter non-profit school authorized through the univerity of wisconsin-milwaukee using a character-based education approach to prepare children for lifelong learning in a rapidly changing world.

Education
3
Central City Cyberschool of Milwaukee Inc

A charter school providing motivation to inner city children to promote a successful future

Education
4
Wingra School Inc

In service of learning, we practice responsive and progressive education, and strive for equity. in service of the whole person, we embrace unique gifts, experiences, and relationships. in service of social justice, we foster…

Education
5
Highland Community School Inc

A community of diverse families and educators that offers quality montessori education in a nurturing environment that enriches, empowers, and inspires children to reach their potential and encourages parents to become involved with their…

6
University Cooperative School

We take a joyful, community-oriented approach to raising engaged citizens, deep learners, and brave adventurers with the skills, creativity, and heart needed to better the world.

7
One City Schools Inc

Our mission is to seed a new model of public education that ensures young children are on track to succeed in a college or career preparatory program from birth through high school graduation.

Human Services
8
West Ridge Academy Charter School

West Ridge Academy Charter School is a K-8 Public School with the vision to prepare each student with an exemplary educational experience allowing each student to meet his or her highest academic and character potential.

Education
9
Explorer West an Independent Middle School

We empower young people to explore and grow their unique intellectual, ethical, and creative capabilities, and to treasure diversity and growth in others.

Education
10
Wisconsin Montessori Society Inc

Mission: educating youngsters to become an informed, committed, and difference-making generation. vision: educating children to graduate as informed, engaged, ethically minded citizens of the world that they inherit. purpose: milwaukee…

Education
11
Wisconsin School Counselor Association Inc

Our vision is for wisconsin to be the model for excellence in equitable school counseling practice, exemplified by the advocacy, leadership, and expertise of the members of the wsca.

12
The Peak School

The peak school seeks to ignite a passion for learning, to develop students of diverse talents and backgrounds who think critically and act with integrity, and to graduate compassionate, confident, capable students who will embrace their…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is City Forward Collective Inc and the most unlike its peers is Drylands Agroecology Research Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 29 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number20%3%<5yr13%10%5–10yr19%14%10–20yr18%31%20–35yr13%21%35–55yr17%21%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value20%1%<5yr13%5%5–10yr19%2%10–20yr18%9%20–35yr13%82%35–55yr17%1%55yr+

The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/35
the rest of the field
12%
1,419/11,816

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

29 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 29 of the 55 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
29/29
Grantees still filing
25/29
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

YAMPA VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $574,000 · PhilanthropyYAMPA VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION+1 more — $3,000 · PhilanthropyMCPREPARATORY SCHOOL OF WISCONSIN INC — $32,200 · EducationMCPREPARATORY…ALL-IN MILWAUKEE INC — $20,000 · EducationALL-IN MILWAU…ACTON ACADEMY — $14,000 · EducationACTON ACADEMYFRIENDS OF MONTESSORI CHILDREN'S ROOM — $10,500 · EducationFRIENDS OF MO…NORTH ROUTT COMMUNITY CHARTER SCHOOL — $10,000 · EducationNORTH ROUTT C…+8 more — $4,250 · EducationCHRISTIAN SCIENCE SOC STEAMBOAT SPR — $14,500 · OtherCHRISTIAN…OMAHA CATHOLIC SCHOOL CONSORTIUM — $6,300 · OtherOMAHA CAT…FOURTH CHURCH OF CHRIST SCIENTIST — $6,100 · OtherFOURTH CH…UNITED WAY OF THE YAMPA VALLEY — $5,000 · OtherUNITED WA…HUNGER TASK FORCE INC — $4,000 · OtherHUNGER TA…Individual grant recipient — $2,500 · OtherUNITED WAY — $2,400 · OtherSAGE HAMILTON EDUCATION PROGRAMS — $2,250 · Other+25 more — $19,725 · Other+25 moreMILWAUKEE PUBLIC MUSEUM INC — $8,500 · Arts & CultureSTRINGS MUSIC FESTIVAL — $2,500 · Arts & Culture+1 more — $150 · Arts & CultureOMAHA ZOO FOUNDATION — $10,200 · AnimalsMILKWORKS INC — $8,500 · HealthUNITED COMMUNITY CENTER INC — $2,000 · Human ServicesGRIEF'S JOURNEY THE COLLECTIVE FOR HOPE — $1,000 · Human Services
Philanthropy$577,000Education$90,950Other$62,775Arts & Culture$11,150Animals$10,200Health$8,500Human Services$3,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetYAMPA VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $574,000 over 5y, 1.2% of budgetMCPREPARATORY SCHOOL OF WISCONSIN INC — $32,200 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetALL-IN MILWAUKEE INC — $20,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetACTON ACADEMY — $14,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetFRIENDS OF MONTESSORI CHILDREN'S ROOM — $10,500 over 4y, 7.7% of budgetOMAHA ZOO FOUNDATION — $10,200 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH ROUTT COMMUNITY CHARTER SCHOOL — $10,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetMILWAUKEE PUBLIC MUSEUM INC — $8,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMILKWORKS INC — $8,500 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetUNITED WAY OF THE YAMPA VALLEY — $5,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetHUNGER TASK FORCE INC — $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLAKE PARK FRIENDS LTD — $3,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetSTRINGS MUSIC FESTIVAL — $2,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED COMMUNITY CENTER INC — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetROUTT COUNTY CRISIS SUPPORT — $2,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetDrylands Agroecology Research Foundation — $1,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetNORTHWEST ROCKY MOUNTAIN CASA — $1,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetGRIEF'S JOURNEY THE COLLECTIVE FOR HOPE — $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetGATEWAY APPRENTICESHIP PROGRAM — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOLLEGE POSSIBLE INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBOOK TRAILS INC — $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetShorewood Supporters of Excellence in Educational Development — $500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCITY FORWARD COLLECTIVE INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHORIZONS K-8 SCHOOL INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST AUGUSTINE PREPARATORY ACADEMY INC — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE LOWELL WHITEMAN SCHOOL — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWISCONSIN PUBLIC RADIO ASSOCIATION INC — $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds YAMPA VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds MCPREPARATORY SCHOOL OF WISCONSIN INC
  • Who funds ALL-IN MILWAUKEE INC
  • Who funds ACTON ACADEMY
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF MONTESSORI CHILDREN'S ROOM
  • Who funds OMAHA ZOO FOUNDATION
  • Who funds NORTH ROUTT COMMUNITY CHARTER SCHOOL
  • Who funds MILWAUKEE PUBLIC MUSEUM INC
  • Who funds MILKWORKS INC
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF THE YAMPA VALLEY
  • Who funds HUNGER TASK FORCE INC
  • Who funds LAKE PARK FRIENDS LTD
  • Who funds STRINGS MUSIC FESTIVAL
  • Who funds UNITED COMMUNITY CENTER INC
  • Who funds ROUTT COUNTY CRISIS SUPPORT
  • Who funds Drylands Agroecology Research Foundation
  • Who funds NORTHWEST ROCKY MOUNTAIN CASA
  • Who funds GRIEF'S JOURNEY THE COLLECTIVE FOR HOPE
  • Who funds GATEWAY APPRENTICESHIP PROGRAM
  • Who funds COLLEGE POSSIBLE INC
  • Who funds BOOK TRAILS INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Colorado Gives FoundationCO18.8× affinity8 shared granteesties to 8 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Colorado Gives Foundation · Craig-Scheckman Family Foundation · Bradley Impact Fund Inc · United Way of Greater Milwaukee & Waukesha County Inc · Baird Foundation Inc · Arzbaecher Family Foundation · Husco Foundation · Charter Manufacturing Company Foundation Inc · Herbert H Kohl Charities Inc · Greater Milwaukee Foundation Inc · Impactassetsinc · The Ayco Charitable Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Rowe Family Foundation Inc Co James C Rowe funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    13report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 55 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph