Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Rowayton Civic Association Inc

The mission of the rowayton civic association is to enrich the lives of rowayton and norwalk residents and neighbors through providing cultural programs, educational services, and supporting local communities initiatives.

$131k
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202024.

Education$147kArts & Culture$65kPublic Safety & Disaster$44kHuman Services$25kRecreation & Sports$20kHousing & Shelter$7kPhilanthropy$7k
02FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 8 grants below total $102,880 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $131,390 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $28,510 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k4 grants · $30k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $73k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$288k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FRIENDS OF BAYLEY BEACH$30,000
ROWAYTON FIRE DEPARTMENT$20,000
ROWAYTON LIBRARY$13,380
ROWAYTON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL$10,000
BRIEN MCMAHON HIGH SCHOOL$8,000
THE CARVER FOUNDATION OF NORWALK$8,000
DOMESTIC VIOLENCE$7,000
ROWAYTON ARTS CENTER$6,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

None of your grants could be placed against low income need for this view.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$271k · 9 repeat orgs$44k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
2

Total granted

$271k
$14k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+18%
+71%

Still filing today

78%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 71% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $30k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’22’23’24
Human ServicesArts & CulturePublic Safety & DisasterPhilanthropyHousing & ShelterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TR
    THE ROWAYTON HOSE COMPANY NO 1 INCORPORATED
    3× · 2022–2024 · $44k · revenue +52%
  • AO
    ASSOCIATION OF THE FREE LIBRARY AND READING ROOM OF ROWAYTON INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $37k · revenue +153%
  • PC
    PTA CONNECTICUT CONGRESS ROWAYTON
    3× · 2022–2024 · $37k · revenue +285%

Funded once

  • PT
    PERSON TO PERSON INC
    one grant, 2020 · $7k · revenue +19%
  • TO
    THE OPEN DOOR SHELTER INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $7k · revenue +71%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Riverton Free Library Association
2
The Public Library of New London

The Public Library of New London is a private, not-for-profit institution that serves the needs of the New London community by providing free access to diverse ideas and information through a variety of library materials, services, and…

Education
3
The Rowan Center Inc

We counsel victims and survivors as they process their experiences of sexual violence from the past, we advocate for them as they navigate the circumstances of the present, and we educate our communities to prevent sexual violence in the…

4
Wheeler School & Library of North Stonington

Wheeler Library serves as the principal public library for the residents of North Stonington. It's mission is to bring people, information and ideas together.

5
Rockville Public Library

The library is the information, continuing education, and cultural center of the community of vernon rockville, ct. the library provides an environment and the tools necessary to meet every community resident's need for information,…

6
Rochester Public Library

To engage the community in life-long learning for all through equal access to information, technology, gathering spaces and expert staff.

Education
7
Stratford Library Association

The mission of the stratford library is to empower and enrich our diverse community by providing access to innovative services, information and ideas.

8
The Noroton Heights Fire Department Incorporated

The Noroton Heights Fire Department, Incorporated provides fire and other emergency response services to its district within the Town of Darien, Connecticut, as well as providing mutual aid coverage to the other fire departments in town…

Health
9
Rowayton Platform Tennis Association Inc

The rowayton platform tennis association (rpta) exists as a social and recreational club to provide exercise, recreation, and social engagement through the playing of the sport of platform tennis. platform tennis is a racket sport derived…

Recreation & Sports
10
The Russell Library Company

To operate a free public library in the city of middletown, ct; to promote literacy and educational activities in connection with the library for the perpetual betterment and enjoyment of its inhabitants.

11
Greenwich Free Library

To provide free library services and computer access to the community.

Education
12
Wpkn Incorporated

WPKN's mission is to strengthen and enrich the community by broadcasting independent, listener-supported, and commercial-free programming.

Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Pta Connecticut Congress Rowayton and the most unlike its peers is Shakespeare On the Sound Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

NORWALK PUBLIC SCHOOLS — $43,400 · OtherNORWALK PUBLIC SCHOOLSASSOCIATION OF THE FREE LIBRARY AND READING ROOM OF ROWAYTON INC — $37,435 · OtherASSOCIATION OF THE FREE LIBRARY AND READING ROOM OF ROWAYTON I…PTA CONNECTICUT CONGRESS ROWAYTON — $36,500 · OtherPTA CONNECTICUT CONGRESS ROWAYTONFRIENDS OF BAYLEY BEACH ROWAYTON — $30,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF BAYLEY BEACH ROWAYTONPTA CONNECTICUT INC — $27,000 · OtherPTA CONNECTICUT INCDOMESTIC VIOLENCE CRISIS CENTER — $24,500 · Human ServicesDOMESTIC VIOLENCE…THE CARVER INC — $23,000 · Human ServicesTHE CARVER INCTHE ROWAYTON HOSE COMPANY NO 1 INCORPORATED — $44,000 · Public Safety & DisasterTHE ROWAYTON HO…SHAKESPEARE ON THE SOUND INC — $22,200 · Arts & CultureSHAKESPEARE …ROWAYTON ARTS CENTER — $13,000 · Arts & CultureROWAYTON ART…PERSON TO PERSON INC — $7,000 · PhilanthropyTHE OPEN DOOR SHELTER INC — $7,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$174,335Human Services$47,500Public Safety & Disaster$44,000Arts & Culture$35,200Philanthropy$7,000Housing & Shelter$7,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE ROWAYTON HOSE COMPANY NO 1 INCORPORATED — $44,000 over 3y, 15% of budgetASSOCIATION OF THE FREE LIBRARY AND READING ROOM OF ROWAYTON INC — $37,435 over 3y, 3.9% of budgetPTA CONNECTICUT CONGRESS ROWAYTON — $36,500 over 3y, 8.1% of budgetDOMESTIC VIOLENCE CRISIS CENTER — $24,500 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetTHE CARVER INC — $23,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetSHAKESPEARE ON THE SOUND INC — $22,200 over 2y, 4.0% of budgetROWAYTON ARTS CENTER — $13,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetTHE OPEN DOOR SHELTER INC — $7,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fairfield County's Community Foundation IncCT13.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fairfield County's Community Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Rowayton Civic Association Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%1%5%11%20%your share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 10%
  • The Carver Inc16% of income from government
  • The Open Door Shelter Inc14% of income from government
  • Domestic Violence Crisis Center10% of income from government
  • Person to Person Inc5% of income from government
  • Rowayton Arts Center0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph