Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →
Plinth

· Public charity

Rotary International District 6960 Inc

Promote social welfare

$163k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$16k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 57% of ROTARY INTERNATIONAL DISTRICT 6960 INC’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 9 grants below total $80,488 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $163,422 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $82,934 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $33k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $47k
$7,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$286k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ROTARY CLUB OF LAKEWOOD RANCH$15,999
ROTARY CLUB OF FT MYERS TRUST FUND$11,260
ROTARY CLUB OF NAPLES$10,000
THE ROTARY CLUB OF MARCO ISLAND SUNRISE$10,000
THE ROTARY CLUB OF BONITA NAPLES INC$7,500
ROTARY CLUB OF FORT MYERS EAST$7,500
ROTARY CLUB OF VENICE SUNCOAST$6,565
ROTARY CLUB OF PUNTA GORDA$5,833
ROTARY CLUB OF BONITA SPRINGS INC$5,831
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–24, $76k) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 79% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%THE ROTARY CLUB OF CHARLOTTE HARBOR SUNSET INC: $9k → 9%THE ROTARY CLUB OF CHARLOTTE HARBOR SUNSET INC: $51k → 25%DISASTER AID USA INC: $10k → 11%ROTARY CLUB OF ENGLEWOOD SUNSET INC: $7k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 16% of Rotary International District 6960 Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 92% of the giving stays in FL; read by stated purpose it is 80% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Rotary International District 6960 Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 11% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$940k · 17 repeat orgs$177k to everyone else

17 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
16

Total granted

$940k
$154k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-4%
0%

Still filing today

88%
63%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 71% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $23k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesPhilanthropyEducationFood & NutritionYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RC
    ROTARY CLUB OF LAKEWOOD RANCH
    7× · 2019–2025 · $158k · revenue +19%
  • RC
    ROTARY CLUB OF BONITA SPRINGS INC
    4× · 2019–2025 · $73k · revenue +54% · 46% of their budget
  • RC
    ROTARY CLUB OF SARASOTA INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $63k · revenue +2%

Funded once

  • MR
    MANATEE RIVER ROTARY
    one grant, 2022 · $50k · revenue -43% · 49% of their budget
  • DA
    DISASTER AID USA INCgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue +56%
  • SF
    SEMINAR FOR TOMORROWS LEADERS INC
    one grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue 0%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Rotary International

Rotary is an organization of business and professional leaders united worldwide who provide humanitarian service, encourage high ethical standards in all vocations, and help build goodwill and peace in the world. The main objective of…

—
2
Marco Island Sunrise Rotary Club
Education
3
Rotary Club Miami Airport Inc
Community Improvement
4
The Rotary Club of Boca Raton West Foundation Corp
Education
5
Rotary International Dublin Am Rotary Club

Raising funds to provide community service at home and throughout the world.

—
6
Rotary International

Service club

—
7
Rotary International

The Rotary Club of San Marino is a community service organization.

—
8
Rotary International Club Charitable Foundation
Philanthropy
9
Los Altos Sunset Rotary Club Endowment Fund Inc
Community Improvement
10
Rotary International - La Jolla Golden Triangle Rotary Club

To provide a broad range of humanitarian service projects and build lasting goodwill locally and globally.

—
11
Rotary Club of Winters Community Foundation
Education
12
Rotary International Sunrise Club

Humanitarian Service

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Rotary Club of Sarasota Inc and the most unlike its peers is Seminar for Tomorrows Leaders Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

7
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
27/27
Grantees still filing
12/27
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ROTARY CLUB OF LAKEWOOD RANCH — $158,487 · OtherROTARY CLUB OF LAKEWOOD RANCHROTARY CLUB OF BONITA SPRINGS INC — $72,583 · OtherROTARY CLUB OF BONITA SPRINGS INCROTARY CLUB OF SARASOTA INC — $63,440 · OtherROTARY CLUB OF SARASOTA INCROTARY INTER MARCO ISLAND SUNRISE — $58,250 · OtherROTARY INTER MARCO ISLAND SUNRISEROTARY CLUB OF BONITA NAPLES INC — $42,500 · OtherROTARY CLUB OF BONITA NAPLES INCROTARY INTERNATIONAL — $38,232 · OtherROTARY INTERNATIONALROTARY CLUB OF FORT MYERS-SUNRISE — $33,603 · OtherROTARY INTERNATIONAL — $28,741 · OtherROTARY CLUB OF SARASOTA BAY FOUNDATION INC — $25,000 · Other+18 more — $162,273 · Other+18 moreTHE FORT MYERS ROTARY TRUST FUND — $199,744 · PhilanthropyTHE FORT MYERS ROT…THE ROTARY CLUB OF CHARLOTTE HARBOR SUNSET INC — $59,299 · Human ServicesTHE ROTARY CLUB …Rotary Club of Naples Charitable Foundation Inc — $51,046 · Human ServicesRotary Club of N…MANATEE RIVER ROTARY — $50,000 · Human ServicesMANATEE RIVER RO…DISASTER AID USA INC — $10,000 · Human ServicesDISASTER AID USA…Rotary Club of Englewood SunsetInc — $7,110 · Human ServicesTHE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL — $88,706 · InternationalMEALS OF HOPE INC — $42,000 · Food & NutritionSEMINAR FOR TOMORROWS LEADERS INC — $9,980 · Youth DevelopmentLEMON BAY SUNRISE ROTARY SCHSHIP TR — $5,233 · Education
Other$683,109Philanthropy$199,744Human Services$177,455International$88,706Food & Nutrition$42,000Youth Development$9,980Education$5,233

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE FORT MYERS ROTARY TRUST FUND — $199,744 over 8y, 53% of budgetROTARY CLUB OF LAKEWOOD RANCH — $158,487 over 7y, 12% of budgetTHE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL — $88,706 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetROTARY CLUB OF BONITA SPRINGS INC — $72,583 over 4y, 46% of budgetROTARY CLUB OF SARASOTA INC — $63,440 over 6y, 15% of budgetTHE ROTARY CLUB OF CHARLOTTE HARBOR SUNSET INC — $59,299 over 2y, 46% of budgetROTARY INTER MARCO ISLAND SUNRISE — $58,250 over 7y, 19% of budgetRotary Club of Naples Charitable Foundation Inc — $51,046 over 5y, 9.3% of budgetMANATEE RIVER ROTARY — $50,000 over 1y, 49% of budgetROTARY CLUB OF BONITA NAPLES INC — $42,500 over 3y, 46% of budgetMEALS OF HOPE INC — $42,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetROTARY CLUB OF FORT MYERS-SUNRISE — $33,603 over 3y, 28% of budgetROTARY CLUB OF SARASOTA BAY FOUNDATION INC — $25,000 over 3y, 18% of budgetROTARY CLUB OF ENGLEWOOD INC — $22,694 over 3y, 9.3% of budgetROTARY INTERNATIONAL SANIBEL-CAPTIVA CLUB — $18,250 over 2y, 11% of budgetROTARY INTERNATIONAL FORT MYERS SOUTH ROTARY CLUB — $16,000 over 2y, 12% of budgetRotary International The Rotary Club of Bradenton Florida Inc — $10,508 over 2y, 13% of budgetRotary Club of Naples Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 6.2% of budgetDISASTER AID USA INC — $10,000 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetSEMINAR FOR TOMORROWS LEADERS INC — $9,980 over 1y, 6.1% of budgetRotary Club of Englewood SunsetInc — $7,110 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetROTARY INTL CHARLOTTE HARBOR ROTARY — $6,781 over 1y, 70% of budgetLEMON BAY SUNRISE ROTARY SCHSHIP TR — $5,233 over 1y, 5.0% of budgetROTARY CLUB OF SARASOTA BAY INC — $5,050 over 1y, 10% of budgetRotary Club of Marco Island Inc — $5,000 over 1y, 15% of budgetPelican Bay Rotary Club Inc — $5,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Rotary Club of Lakewo…The Rotary Foundation…Amazonsmile Foundation
Rotary Club of Lakewood RanchFL17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Rotary Club of Lakewood Ranch · The Rotary Foundation of Rotary International · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Rotary International District 6960 Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 240%5%19%42%75%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    24get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Rotary International District 6960 Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Rotary International District 6960 Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 37 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home
    State money flows
    the interactive map of money crossing state lines