Skip to content

· Public charity

Rotary International District 5950 Inc

The organization's primary mission is to support the activities of the rotary clubs within the district (71 clubs) by providing leadership training program materials, and hosting meetings and conferences.

$151k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Education$272kInternational$166kCommunity Improvement$166kFood & Nutrition$112kEnvironment$91kHealth$80kPhilanthropy$67kRecreation & Sports$43kOther$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 15 grants below total $139,319, the rows itemized in this filing. The $151,319 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $12,000 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $29k
  • $10k–50k11 grants · $110k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$242k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BLOOMINGTON ROTARY CLUB FOUNDATION$10,000
MINNEAPOLIS ROTARY FOUNDATION$10,000
EDINA ROTARY FOUNDATION$10,000
REDWOOD FALLS ROTARY CLUB$10,000
CHANHASSEN ROTARY FOUNDATION$10,000
ALEXANDRIA ROTARY CLUB$10,000
MINNEAPOLIS UNIVERSITY ROTARY SERVICE FOUNDATION$10,000
ROTARY CLUB OF LAKE MINNETONKA EXCELSIOR$10,000
MINNEWASKA ROTARY CLUB$10,000
ROTARY E-CLUB OF GLOBAL TRAVELERS$10,000
EDEN PRAIRIE ROTARY FOUNDATION$10,000
CRYSTAL NEW HOPE ROBBINSDALE ROTARY CLUB$9,000
ST CLOUD GRANITE ROTARY FOUNDATION INC$8,000
SAVAGE ROTARY FOUNDATION$6,319
ST LOUIS PARK ROTARY FOUNDATION$6,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY19–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 6%. 83% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 6%CHANHASSEN ROTARY FOUNDATION: $20k → 5%ROTARY 5950 FOUNDATION - TC ECOCLUB: $10k → 6%HUTCHINSON ROTARY FOUNDATION: $10k → 7%BROOKLYN CENTER ROTARY: $10k → 7%GAYLORD ROTARY CLUB: $10k → 8%ALEXANDRIA ROTARY CLUB: $10k → 9%ROTARY CLUB OF LITCHFIELD: $10k → 9%ROTARY INTERNATIONAL ROTARY CLUB OF GLENWOOD: $10k → 10%ROTARY CLUB OF MINNETONKA FOUNDATION: $10k → 11%REDWOOD FALLS ROTARY CLUB: $10k → 11%CHANHASSEN ROTARY FOUNDATION: $10k → 5%ROTARY CLUB OF BUFFALO FOUNDATION: $24k → 5%BURNSVILLE ROTARY FOUNDATION: $10k → 6%BROOKLYN CENTER ROTARY FOUNDATION: $10k → 7%ROTARY E-CLUB OF GLOBAL TRAVELERS MINNESOTA USA: $10k → 9%GLENWOOD ROTARY CLUB: $10k → 10%ROGERS ROTARY FOUNDATION: $10k → 11%CHANHASSEN ROTARY FOUNDATION: $10k → 5%ROGERS ROTARY FOUNDATION: $10k → 5%ROTARY 5950 FOUNDATION: $10k → 6%MINNEWASKA ROTARY CLUB: $10k → 10%EDEN PRAIRIE NOON ROTARY CLUB: $10k → 5%ORONO ROTARY FOUNDATION: $10k → 11%CHANHASSEN ROTARY FOUNDATION: $10k → 5%WACONIA WEST CARVER ROTARY: $10k → 5%APPLE VALLEY ROTARY CLUB FOUNDATION: $14k → 6%EXCELSIOR ROTARY FOUNDATION: $15k → 11%BROOKLYN PARK ROTARY FOUNDATION: $10k → 5%ROTARY INTERNATIONAL APPLE VALLEY CLUB: $10k → 6%ROTARY CLUB OF LAKE MINNETONKA EXCELSIOR: $10k → 11%BROOKLYN PARK ROTARY FOUNDATION: $10k → 5%ROTARY CLUB OF LAKE MINNETONKA EXCELSIOR: $10k → 11%BROOKLYN PARK ROTARY FOUNDATION: $10k → 5%ROTARY CLUB OF LAKE MINNETONKA EXCELSIOR: $10k → 11%ROTARY CLUB OF LAKE MINNETONKA EXCELSIOR: $10k → 11%ROTARY CLUB OF LAKE MINNETONKA - EXCELSIOR: $10k → 11%EDINA ROTARY FOUNDATION: $20k → 11%MAPLE GROVE ROTARY FOUNDATION: $14k → 11%EDINA ROTARY FOUNDATION: $10k → 11%ROTARY CLUB OF MINNESOTA VETERANS FOUNDATION: $15k → 11%MAPLE GROVE ROTARY FOUNDATION: $14k → 11%EDINA ROTARY FOUNDATION: $10k → 11%MINNEAPOLIS UNIVERSITY ROTARY SERVICE FOUNDATION: $10k → 11%MAPLE GROVE ROTARY FOUNDATION: $10k → 11%MINNEAPOLIS CITY OF LAKES ROTARY FOUNDATION: $13k → 11%EDINA MORNINGSIDE ROTARY FOUNDATION: $24k → 11%BROOKLYN PARK ROTARY FOUNDATION: $15k → 11%TWIN CITIES ROTARY ECOCLUB: $15k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 13% of Rotary International District 5950 Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 100% of the giving stays in MN; by stated purpose, 47%.

Rotary International District 5950 Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 51% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

77%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$836k · 27 repeat orgs$251k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +12% since the first grant, against -11% for those funded once.

27 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 16 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

27
21

Total granted

$836k
$220k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+12%
-11%

Still filing today

67%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $30k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Community ImprovementEducationPhilanthropyReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TE
    THE EDINA ROTARY FOUNDATION INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $67k · revenue +61%
  • BR
    BLOOMINGTON ROTARY CLUB FOUNDATION
    6× · 2019–2025 · $60k · revenue +112% · 35% of their budget
  • RC
    ROTARY CLUB OF LAKE MINNETONKA- EXCELSIOR INC
    5× · 2020–2025 · $50k · revenue +9%

Funded once

  • EM
    EDINA MORNINGSIDE ROTARY FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $24k
  • SC
    ST CLOUD ROTARY FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2023 · $18k · revenue +13%
  • ER
    EXCELSIOR ROTARY FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2019 · $15k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
River Falls Rotary Club

Community/World Service

—
2
Rotary International Club Charitable Foundation
Philanthropy
3
Murray Rotary Club Foundation
—
4
Rotary International Rotary Club of Watertown Wi

Community service

—
5
Rotary Club of Maple Grove

Rotary Club of Maple Grove is a member club of Rotary International, a service organization involved in community activities.

—
6
Rotary International

to provide community as well as worlwide assistance to those in need.

—
7
The Rotary Club of Snoqualmie Valley

Service and funding to various organizations throughout our community and worldwide.

Human Services
8
Rotary International Menomonie Rotary

A fellowship of individuals who are focused on supporting their community and building bridges between nations.

—
9
Rotary International

Rotary club of superior is a service organization located in superior, wi and chartered under rotary international. the club members donate hundreds of hours annually to different projects and fundraisers in the community and contribute…

—
10
Rotary International

Rotary is an organization of business and professional leaders united worldwide who provide humanitarian service, encourage high ethical standards in all vocations, and help build goodwill and peace in the world. The main objective of…

—
11
Bemidji Rotary Club

To provide humanitarian service, encourage high ethical standards in all vocations and help build goodwill and peace in the world

—
12
Rotary International

Service club

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Minneapolis Rotary Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Apple Valley Rotary Scholarship Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 53 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
28/28
Grantees still filing
15/28
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE EDINA ROTARY FOUNDATION INC: $66,831 · OtherTHE EDINA ROTARY FOUNDATION INCBLOOMINGTON ROTARY CLUB FOUNDATION: $60,000 · OtherBLOOMINGTON ROTARY CLUB FOUNDATIONBROOKLYN PARK ROTARY FOUNDATION: $55,000 · OtherBROOKLYN PARK ROTARY FOUNDATIONCRYSTAL NEW HOPE ROBBINSDALE ROTARY CLUB: $41,000 · OtherCRYSTAL NEW HOPE ROBBINSDALE ROTARY CLUBMINNEAPOLIS CITY OF LAKES ROTARY FOUNDATION: $33,000 · OtherMINNEWASKA ROTARY CLUB: $30,000 · OtherROGERS ROTARY FOUNDATION: $28,000 · Other+32 more: $414,601 · Other+32 moreChanhassen Rotary Foundation: $50,000 · Community ImprovementChanhassen Rotary…ROTARY CLUB OF BUFFALO FOUNDATION: $45,849 · Community ImprovementROTARY CLUB OF BU…MINNEAPOLIS ROTARY FOUNDATION: $44,323 · Community ImprovementMINNEAPOLIS ROTAR…MINNEAPOLIS UNIVERSITY ROTARY SERVICE FOUNDATION: $28,000 · Community ImprovementMINNEAPOLIS UNIVE…WILLMAR ROTARY CLUB FOUNDATION: $8,000 · Community ImprovementROTARY CLUB OF LAKE MINNETONKA- EXCELSIOR INC: $50,000 · EducationROTARY CLU…APPLE VALLEY ROTARY SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION: $24,151 · EducationAPPLE VALL…BURNSVILLE ROTARY FOUNDATION: $18,000 · EducationBURNSVILLE…CHASKA ROTARY FOUNDATION INC: $8,463 · EducationCHASKA ROT…MAPLE GROVE ROTARY FOUNDATION: $38,000 · PhilanthropyMAPLE GRO…ROTARY 5950 FOUNDATION: $28,000 · PhilanthropyROTARY 59…ROTARY CLUB OF MINNETONKA FOUNDATION: $18,000 · PhilanthropyROTARY CL…BURNSVILLE ROTARY BREAKFAST CLUB FOUNDATION: $5,315 · PhilanthropyBURNSVILL…ROTARY INTERNATIONAL EDINA ROTARY FOUNDATION: $20,000 · Religion
Other$728,432Community Improvement$176,172Education$100,614Philanthropy$89,315Religion$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100kgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE EDINA ROTARY FOUNDATION INC: $66,831 over 8y, 8.2% of budgetBLOOMINGTON ROTARY CLUB FOUNDATION: $60,000 over 6y, 35% of budgetBROOKLYN PARK ROTARY FOUNDATION: $55,000 over 6y, 26% of budgetROTARY CLUB OF LAKE MINNETONKA- EXCELSIOR INC: $50,000 over 5y, 3.4% of budgetChanhassen Rotary Foundation: $50,000 over 4y, 21% of budgetROTARY CLUB OF BUFFALO FOUNDATION: $45,849 over 6y, 31% of budgetMINNEAPOLIS ROTARY FOUNDATION: $44,323 over 6y, 7.2% of budgetMAPLE GROVE ROTARY FOUNDATION: $38,000 over 4y, 20% of budgetMINNEAPOLIS CITY OF LAKES ROTARY FOUNDATION: $33,000 over 4y, 5.3% of budgetMINNEWASKA ROTARY CLUB: $30,000 over 3y, 16% of budgetMINNEAPOLIS UNIVERSITY ROTARY SERVICE FOUNDATION: $28,000 over 3y, 3.9% of budgetROTARY 5950 FOUNDATION: $28,000 over 3y, 16% of budgetAPPLE VALLEY ROTARY SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION: $24,151 over 2y, 13% of budgetST CLOUD GRANITE ROTARY CLUB: $22,000 over 3y, 14% of budgetROTARY CLUB OF EDEN PRAIRIE NOON: $20,000 over 2y, 16% of budgetROTARY INTERNATIONAL EDINA ROTARY FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 2y, 15% of budgetROTARY CLUB OF MINNETONKA FOUNDATION: $18,000 over 2y, 20% of budgetBURNSVILLE ROTARY FOUNDATION: $18,000 over 4y, 5.9% of budgetST CLOUD ROTARY FOUNDATION INC: $18,000 over 1y, 9.8% of budgetRotary International-Alexandria Club: $16,000 over 2y, 5.9% of budgetWACONIA WEST CARVER ROTARY: $10,000 over 1y, 20% of budgetMONTICELLO ROTARY CLUB: $9,300 over 2y, 24% of budgetCHASKA ROTARY FOUNDATION INC: $8,463 over 1y, 27% of budgetSt Louis Park Rotary Foundation: $6,000 over 3y, 4.1% of budgetBURNSVILLE ROTARY BREAKFAST CLUB FOUNDATION: $5,315 over 2y, 18% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE EDINA ROTARY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds BLOOMINGTON ROTARY CLUB FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BROOKLYN PARK ROTARY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ROTARY CLUB OF LAKE MINNETONKA- EXCELSIOR INC ↗
  • Who funds Chanhassen Rotary Foundation ↗
  • Who funds ROTARY CLUB OF BUFFALO FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MINNEAPOLIS ROTARY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MAPLE GROVE ROTARY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MINNEAPOLIS CITY OF LAKES ROTARY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MINNEWASKA ROTARY CLUB ↗
  • Who funds MINNEAPOLIS UNIVERSITY ROTARY SERVICE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ROTARY 5950 FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds APPLE VALLEY ROTARY SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ST CLOUD GRANITE ROTARY CLUB ↗
  • Who funds ROTARY CLUB OF EDEN PRAIRIE NOON ↗
  • Who funds ROTARY INTERNATIONAL EDINA ROTARY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ROTARY CLUB OF MINNETONKA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BURNSVILLE ROTARY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ST CLOUD ROTARY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Rotary International-Alexandria Club ↗
  • Who funds WACONIA WEST CARVER ROTARY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Minneapolis FoundationMN11.5× affinity5 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Minneapolis Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Rotary International District 5950 Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Rotary International District 5950 Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Rotary International District 5950 Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Rotary International District 5950 Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 53 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Rotary International District 5950’s filings →

    More from the funding graph