How much did Rotary Club of Corning grant in FY2019?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 44% of ROTARY CLUB OF CORNING NY’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2019 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2019

Under $10k12 grants · $35k
$10k–50k1 grant · $13k

$1,000

Median grant

States reached

$70k

Total assets

Largest grants

Rotary International Found$12,962
Rotary District 7120$8,292
Rotary International$8,258
House With Heart$7,245
Rotary District 6940$4,000
Wilminton Rotary Club$3,310
Paradise Rotary Foundation$1,000
Salvation Army-Corning Cit$600
Quilts of Valor$600
Science & Discovery Center$500
Corning Meals on Wheels$500
Family Service Society Inc$400
Craig Park Dog Park Fund$300

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–19, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16% — the area typically sits at 11%. 93% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

76%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$72k · 4 repeat orgs$23k to everyone else

4 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2019, 0 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2019 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$72k

$5k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+1%

+28%

Still filing today

75%

25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2019, 63% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $18k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

PhilanthropyHuman ServicesInternationalArts & CultureCommunity ImprovementFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

The Rotary Foundation
2× · 2018–2019 · $39k · revenue +1%
RI
Rotary International
2× · 2018–2019 · $16k
RD
Rotary District 7120
2× · 2018–2019 · $16k · revenue -8%

Funded once

WH
Watson Homestead Center
one grant, 2018 · $3k · revenue +44%
SC
Steuben County Sheriff Dep
one grant, 2018 · $1k
TW
The Wheelchair Foundation
one grant, 2018 · $600 · revenue +28%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Rotary Club of Fresno Foundation

The Foundation was established to raise funds for the purpose of contributing to charitable and educational organizations in the local, national, and international community.

Community Improvement

Rotary International

Rotary is an organization of business and professional leaders united worldwide who provide humanitarian service, encourage high ethical standards in all vocations, and help build goodwill and peace in the world. The main objective of…

—

Rotary Foundation

To provide funds for other charitable organizations and causes throughout the community and the world.

Community Improvement

Rotary Club of Santa Fe Foundation Inc

To receive administer and disburse funds for humanitarian purposes in Santa Fe and Northern New Mexico

Education

The Salem Rotary Foundation

Philanthropy

Rotary International District 7670

Rotary International District 7670 is an administrative district of Rotary International. The organization is a volunteer organization that provides support to 50 member clubs in western North Carolina.

—

Red Bluff Rotary Foundation

Community enrichment through scholarships, donations and literacy activities.

—

Rotary Charity Foundation

To provide benefits and support to those in need.

—

Murray Rotary Club Foundation

—

The Foundation of the Rotary Club

To provide college scholarships and other charitable purposes.

Education

Rotary District 6990 Foundation Inc

Human Services

Wenatchee Rotary Foundation Inc

The mission of the rotary foundation is to support the efforts of rotary international.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Rotary District 6940 Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Behring Global Educational Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

14 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

12/14

Grantees still filing

11/14

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$41,150International$38,748Human Services$8,245Community Improvement$3,310Philanthropy$1,800Arts & Culture$800Food & Nutrition$500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way of the Southern Tier IncNY16× affinity5 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way of the Southern Tier Inc · Community Foundation of Elmira-Corning · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation Rotary Club of Corning funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%

typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: Rotary District 7120.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

low risk

~10 months of operating runway; revenue held over 6 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

6 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 166035683 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on Rotary District 7120, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 10 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2023; revenue held over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 5% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Rotary Club of Corning?

Find your warmest path to Rotary Club of Corning through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

Rotary Club of Corning

What you funded, over time

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

14 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Rotary Club of Corning?

More from the funding graph

Rotary Club of Corning

What you funded, over time

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

14 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Rotary Club of Corning?

More from the funding graph