Skip to content
Rotary Club of Brownsville - Sunrise Texas USA Inc at a glance

· Public charity

Rotary Club of Brownsville - Sunrise Texas USA Inc

The main objective of rotary is service.

$19k
Granted FY2022
1
Grants FY2022
1
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2022.

International$42kArts & Culture$12kEducation$5kHealth$4kRecreation & Sports$2kHuman Services$2kPhilanthropy$1kCrime & Legal$932Other$0
02FY2022 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 1 grants below total $5,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $19,203 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $14,203 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$87k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TEXAS SOUTHMOST COLLEGE FOUNDATION$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–21, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 23%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%Bishop Enrique San Pedro Ozanam: $932 → 23%Sunshine Haven Inc: $932 → 23%Good Neighbor Settlement House Inc: $931 → 23%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Hospice House of Greenville

The organization's mission is the operation of hospice house.

Human Services
2
Hospice of the Valleys Sc Inc

We foster reverence for life, relief of suffering, and compassion in loss for the terminally ill residents and their families in the communities we serve.

Human Services
3
The Brown Sanctuary Animal Foundation

The primary purpose of the organization is philosophy that the animals help people and people help animals, through trust, unconditional love, and respect, creates a legacy of caring. sharing this philosophy with others, the center…

Animals
4
Sunny Oaks Inc

Sunny Oaks provides 24 hour residential services, supported living, nutritional, community and training services for individuals with I/DD (Intellectual and/or Developmental Disabilities) referred by state and county governments. Services…

—
5
Brownsville Community Health Clinic Corp

At new horizon health center (nhhc) our goal is to provide comprehensive primary health care services with excellence and dignity to our community.

—
6
Brownsville Housing Opportunity Corporation

To provide decent and affordable housing to low - income families.

Housing & Shelter
7
Valley Senior Services Inc

To promote independence and better health for senior citizens.

—
8
Sunny Glen Children's Home Inc

Sunny Glen Childrens Home, Inc. cares for children in need. Our care will be competent, compassionate and professional. We will help every child achieve their greatest potential-physically, emotionally, spiritually and academically.

Human Services
9
Southwest Crisis Center

Our mission is to provide support, advocacy, and hope to individuals and families impacted by sexual and domestic violence, sexual exploitation, and child abuse.

Civil Rights
10
The Desert Sanctuary Inc

To provide shelter and counseling for victims of domestic violence in the Barstow area.

Human Services
11
Brazos Valley Rehabilitation Center

A nonprofit provider of services to persons with disabilities, accepting any disabled person who can be helped regardless of their ability to pay. It is the mission and policy of the organization that program service fees be charged to…

Health
12
Sunshine Services

Dedicated to providing person-centered support for individuals with developmental disabilities that promote independence, inclusion, and empowerment to reach their personal version of happiness and life satisfaction.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Big Heroes Inc; the most unlike its peers is Sunshine Haven Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
11/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ROTARY INTERNATIONAL: $17,046 · OtherROTARY INTERNATIONALTHE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS RIO GRANDE VALLEY: $10,052 · OtherTHE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS RIO GRANDE VALLEYTexas Southmost College Foundation Inc: $5,000 · OtherTexas Southmost College Foundation IncClub Rotario Matamoros Professional AC: $2,000 · OtherClub Rotario Matamoros Professional AC+4 more: $2,944 · Other+4 moreTHE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL: $24,801 · InternationalTHE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERN…BROWNSVILLE SOCIETY FOR CRIPPLED CHILDREN INCORPORATED: $3,331 · HealthTHE BISHOP ENRIQUE SAN PEDRO OZANAM CENTER INC: $932 · Human ServicesSUNSHINE HAVEN INC: $932 · Human ServicesGood Neighbor Settlement House Inc: $931 · Human ServicesCAMILLE PLAYERS INC: $2,400 · Arts & CultureRIO GRANDE VALLEY PHILANTHROPIC FOUNDATION: $1,000 · PhilanthropyCAMERON COUNTY CHILDREN ADVOCACY CENTER INC: $932 · Crime & Legal
Other$37,042International$24,801Health$3,331Human Services$2,795Arts & Culture$2,400Philanthropy$1,000Crime & Legal$932

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL: $24,801 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetROTARY INTERNATIONAL: $17,046 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBROWNSVILLE SOCIETY FOR CRIPPLED CHILDREN INCORPORATED: $3,331 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetCAMILLE PLAYERS INC: $2,400 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetRIO GRANDE VALLEY PHILANTHROPIC FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCAMERON COUNTY CHILDREN ADVOCACY CENTER INC: $932 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE BISHOP ENRIQUE SAN PEDRO OZANAM CENTER INC: $932 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSUNSHINE HAVEN INC: $932 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFriendship of Women Inc: $932 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVALLEY ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $931 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGood Neighbor Settlement House Inc: $931 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBIG HEROES INC: $931 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Brownsville Foundatio…Rio Grande Valley Phi…Valley Baptist Legacy…Rotary Club of Browns…Neal & Lourdes Simmon…United Way of Souther…Raul Tijerina Jr Foun…Hernandez FoundationJules D Gosseaux Foun…Serafy FoundationMusk FoundationCommunities Foundatio…
Brownsville Foundation for Health and EducationTX24.2× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Brownsville Foundation for Health and Education · Rio Grande Valley Philanthropic Foundation · Valley Baptist Legacy Foundation · Rotary Club of Brownsville Charitable Foundation · Neal & Lourdes Simmons Foundation · United Way of Southern Cameron County · Raul Tijerina Jr Foundation · Hernandez Foundation · Jules D Gosseaux Foundation Inc · Serafy Foundation · Musk Foundation · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Rotary Club of Brownsville - Sunrise Texas USA Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Rotary Club of Brownsville - Sunrise Texas USA Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $7k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2022, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Rotary Club of Brownsville - Sunrise Texas USA’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home