Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Hernandez Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$579k
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$300k
Largest
01What you fund
0198% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Education$2.9MArts & Culture$1.2MHuman Services$186kAnimals$76kHealth$50kPhilanthropy$27kRecreation & Sports$10kYouth Development$10kOther$0
02FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $2k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $35k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $242k
  • $250k+1 grant · $300k
$25,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$60k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE ASSOCAITION OF FORMER STUDENTS$300,000
OP 1033 INC$242,364
CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE RIO GRANDE VALLEY$25,000
ASTRA EDUCATION IN SPORTS$10,000
SAINT JOSEPH ACADEMY$2,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–23, $11k) land where the poverty rate runs at 23%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%OZANAM CENTER: $96 → 23%PROYECTO JUAN DIEGO: $5k → 23%PROYECTO JUAN DIEGO: $5k → 23%SUNSHINE HAVEN INC: $140 → 23%THE GOOD NEIGHBOR SETTLEMENT HOUSE: $1k → 23%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$3.9M · 8 repeat orgs$567k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +49% since the first grant, against +28% for the ones you funded once.

8 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
23

Total granted

$3.9M
$557k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+49%
+28%

Still filing today

63%
39%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationAnimalsPhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TA
    Texas A&M Foundation
    4× · 2017–2023 · $1.1M · revenue +90%
  • AW
    A WISH WITH WINGS INC
    2× · 2017–2020 · $50k · revenue +49%
  • RG
    RIO GRANDE VALLEY PHILANTHROPIC FOUNDATION
    2× · 2017–2020 · $27k · revenue +89%

Funded once

  • TA
    TEXAS A&M BROWNSVILLE
    one grant, 2017 · $297k
  • THE TSTC FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $100k · revenue +154%
  • DC
    DOCENT COUNCIL OF THE GLADYS PORTER ZOO
    one grant, 2020 · $50k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley Foundation

The mission is to increase the university endowment by connecting all segments of the university to the community and corporate world through value enhancing relationships and award scholarships and/or provide support to the university of…

2
Rio Grande Valley Community Foundation

Promotion of fine arts in the city of McAllen, Texas and surrounding area.

Recreation & Sports
3
Loaves and Fishes of the Rio Grande Valley Inc

Food kitchen for indigent families

Human Services
4
Rio Grande Valley Partnership

To promote and enchance the economic wellbeing of its membership and the rio grande valley; to foster and develop the chamber philosophy; to work with local chambers of commerce in the rio grande valley; to encourage a spirit of…

5
St Vincent Ferrer Foundation of Texas

The Foundation's primary purpose is to engage in activities designed to promote the perennial teaching and devotions of authentic Catholicism, such as providing audio and printed materials, a website with sermons and prayers, printed…

Religion
6
Ronald Mcdonald House Charities of the Rio Grande Valley Texas

The organization supports the well being of children by (a) providing temporary lodging primarily for seriously ill children and their families while receiving treatment at nearby hospitals or similar treatment facilities and (b) making…

7
Rio Hondo College Foundation

The Rio Hondo College Foundation is a non-profit organization that provides financial assistance for scholarships and programs which meet the needs of Rio Hondo College's students.

Education
8
Affordable Homes of South Texas Inc

Affordable Homes of South Texas, Inc. is organized for the purpose of providing housing for qualified low-income families within the City of McAllen, Texas and Hidalgo County, Texas.

Housing & Shelter
9
Lower Rio Grande Valley Community Health Management

Provide medical services to individuals who do not have medical care services due to their economic status.

Health
10
Guadalupe Regional Medical Foundation

Guadalupe regional medical foundation (grmf) is a 501(c)(3) public charity that advances guadalupe regional medical center's (grmc) mission in providing excellent care to every life it is privileged to touch.

Health
11
The Humane Society of El Paso Endowment

To raise and manage endowment funds to sustain the operating and capital requirements of the humane society of el paso in perpetuity.

Animals
12
Rio Grande Valley Partners

Support of charitable organizations

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Catholic Charities of the Rio Grande Valley and the most unlike its peers is Sunshine Haven Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/15
Grantees still filing
11/15
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE ASSOCAITION OF FORMER STUDENTS — $1,200,000 · OtherTHE ASSOCAITION OF FORMER STUDENTSOP 1033 INC — $1,160,708 · OtherOP 1033 INCTEXAS A&M BROWNSVILLE — $297,250 · OtherTEXAS A&M BROWNSVILLECATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE RIO GRANDE VALLEY — $175,000 · OtherCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE RIO GRANDE VALLEYSAINT JOSEPH ACADEMY — $152,000 · Other+17 more — $183,530 · Other+17 moreTexas A&M Foundation — $1,095,000 · EducationTexas A&M FoundationTHE TSTC FOUNDATION — $100,000 · EducationTHE TSTC FOUNDATIONRIO GRANDE VALLEY PHILANTHROPIC FOUNDATION — $27,400 · PhilanthropyVALLEY ZOOLOGICAL ENDOWMENT — $25,000 · AnimalsPROYECTO JUAN DIEGO INC — $10,000 · Human ServicesGood Neighbor Settlement House Inc — $1,000 · Human Services+2 more — $236 · Human ServicesFORT WORTH STOCK SHOW SYNDICATE — $9,744 · Youth DevelopmentGUADALUPE CULTURAL ARTS CENTER — $200 · Arts & Culture
Other$3,168,488Education$1,195,000Philanthropy$27,400Animals$25,000Human Services$11,236Youth Development$9,744Arts & Culture$200

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTexas A&M Foundation — $1,095,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE RIO GRANDE VALLEY — $175,000 over 4y, 1.8% of budgetTHE TSTC FOUNDATION — $100,000 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetA WISH WITH WINGS INC — $50,000 over 2y, 3.5% of budgetRIO GRANDE VALLEY PHILANTHROPIC FOUNDATION — $27,400 over 2y, 11% of budgetVALLEY ZOOLOGICAL ENDOWMENT — $25,000 over 1y, 4.5% of budgetPROYECTO JUAN DIEGO INC — $10,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetFORT WORTH STOCK SHOW SYNDICATE — $9,744 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetEDDIE LUCIO SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC — $6,000 over 1y, 61% of budgetGUADALUPE CULTURAL ARTS CENTER — $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Texas A&M Foundation
  • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE RIO GRANDE VALLEY
  • Who funds THE TSTC FOUNDATION
  • Who funds A WISH WITH WINGS INC
  • Who funds RIO GRANDE VALLEY PHILANTHROPIC FOUNDATION
  • Who funds VALLEY ZOOLOGICAL ENDOWMENT
  • Who funds PROYECTO JUAN DIEGO INC
  • Who funds FORT WORTH STOCK SHOW SYNDICATE
  • Who funds EDDIE LUCIO SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC
  • Who funds FOOD BANK OF RIO GRANDE VALLEY INC
  • Who funds RIO GRANDE HABITAT FOR HUMANITYINC
  • Who funds Good Neighbor Settlement House Inc
  • Who funds GUADALUPE CULTURAL ARTS CENTER
  • Who funds SUNSHINE HAVEN INC
  • Who funds THE BISHOP ENRIQUE SAN PEDRO OZANAM CENTER INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Valley Baptist Legacy FoundationTX19.9× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Valley Baptist Legacy Foundation · Brownsville Foundation for Health and Education · Raul Tijerina Jr Foundation · Rotary Club of Brownsville Charitable Foundation · Rio Grande Valley Philanthropic Foundation · Serafy Foundation · The John G and Marie Stella Kenedy Memorial Foundation · Rotary Club of Brownsville Sunrise Texas USA Inc · Save The Children Federation Inc · Greater Houston Community Foundation · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Hernandez Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Hernandez Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Hernandez Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph