Loading…
· Private foundation
ROSZTOCZY FOUNDATION
This foundation accepts unsolicited grant applications.
$677k
Granted FY2025
30
Grants
10
Communities
$100k
Largest
01What you fund
01
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 77% of ROSZTOCZY FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.
02beneath the categories
Past the labels — and the year it shifted
Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.
…and in their own words, year by year
2021
gyorgyresearch englishenglish professorprofessor georginageorgina kleegecelllaboratory
2022
martinezmurillosaldanadamaris floresjasminelabortaryclinical research
2023
physicalstudyscholarship promisescholarship uclaucla lawresearch bolondbolond zlgyarto
2024
promise scholarshipsvisiting studentstudent researchresearch bolondbolond zlgyartozlgyarto deptdept microbiology
2025
nagyleescholarship professorvisiting studentscholarship promisescholarshipsscholarship prof
Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.
03FY2025 · 30 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k11 grants · $64k
- $10k–50k14 grants · $263k
- $50k–250k5 grants · $353k
$15,000
Median grant
10
States reached
$16M
Total assets
Largest grants
- E3 AFRICA$100,000
- GRAND CANYON UNIVERSITY$76,900
- NORTHERN AZ UNIVERSITY$64,500
- AZ COLLEGE OF NURSING$60,997
- ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY$50,480
- DR KRISZRAIN BENE$30,000
- WEST VALLEY CHRISTIAN SCHOOL$25,000
- NATIONAL CENTER FOR FAMILIES LEARNING$22,500
- IVAN LASZLO NAGY$22,500
- ALMOS OROSZ$21,000
- BORBOLA SZEDMAK$21,000
- ILLES VOROS$21,000
- VENCEL JUHASZ$21,000
- GYULA MUSKOVICS$15,000
- DR GERGELY LENDAI$15,000
02The need
04
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Your human-services grants (FY25–25, $15k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11% — the area typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
05
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 7% of ROSZTOCZY FOUNDATION’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 53% of the giving stays in AZ; read by stated purpose it is 56% — more of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.
ROSZTOCZY FOUNDATIONlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 4.8% directed abroad (not shown)Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Your edge
repeat funding
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
67%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.0M · 51 repeat orgs$974k to everyone else
51 repeat relationships — 18 still active in FY2025, 33 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Re-uppedFunded once
Organizations
51
69
Total granted
$2.0M
$726k
Median revenue growth · since first grant
+78%
+733%
Still filing today
12%
3%
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 64% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $248k went to new ones.
RenewedFirst-time
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
EducationPhilanthropyPublic BenefitYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesOther
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- GCGRAND CANYON UNIVERSITY3× · 2023–2025 · $229k · revenue +10%
- VOVALLEY OF THE SUN UNITED WAY4× · 2021–2024 · $210k · revenue +24%
- NCNATIONAL CENTER FOR FAMILIES LEARNING3× · 2022–2025 · $90k · revenue +163%
Funded once
- HYHOMELESS YOUTH CONNECTIONgraduatedone grant, 2024 · $85k · revenue +178%
- DJDR JUDIT SIMONone grant, 2024 · $30k
- JPJASMINE PARRA REYESone grant, 2022 · $22k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
04Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
Phoenix Christian Unified Schools
Phoenix Christian Unified Schools, in partnership with the family, equips students to discover and develop their talents and spiritual gifts in order to live a life of service, inpacting the world for Christ.
—
2
Camp Verde United Christian School
We want our students to know Jesus and be loved. UCS nutures each one to grow their faith and excel academically through Christ-centerd, Bible-based instruction.
Education
3
Oak Valley College
Equip students to live, learn, and grow in their faith, service, and calling through a Bachelor of Arts in Business framed by a Christian worldview with no student loans.
Education
4
Regent University
Regent University serves as a center of Christian thought and action to provide excellent education through a Biblical perspective and global context equipping Christian leaders to change the world.
—
5
Manna University
Manna University is a biblical higher education institution dedicated to educating, equipping, and empowering emerging leaders to change the world.
Education
6
Student Lunchbox Inc
Fighting food insecurity among college students by building a bridge between food waste and campus hunger.
Food & Nutrition
7
Arizona Friends of Foster Children
Arizona Friends of Foster Children Foundation creates opportunities to build self-esteem and empower children and youth in foster care by funding social, athletic and educational activities and services to enrich their life experiences and…
Human Services
8
Utah Valley University Foundation Inc
To assist Utah Valley University (UVU) in fulfilling its objectives: to aid and advance the services of UVU, to raise funds for student scholarships, and to raise funds for University program development.
Education
9
Antelope Valley College Foundation
The Foundation's mission is to increase resources, raise funds and create friends and partnerships in support of education at Antelope Valley College.
Unclassified
10
Sunshine Valley Child Care
Sunshine Valley Child Care is a non-denomination Christian Child Care Center that offers children 16 months to 5 1/2 years a variety of activities and opportunties to learn and grow.
—
11
Victor Valley College Foundation
We develop resources and make friends to help Victor Valley College serve our community.
—
12
Augustana College
Offer a challenging education that develops the qualities of mind, spirit and body for students.
Education
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Center for Families Learning and the most unlike its peers is Valley of the Sun United Way. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
06the grantee network
10 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
9/10
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Other$2,278,291Education$344,473Philanthropy$210,000Youth Development$85,000Public Benefit$20,000Human Services$15,000
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Nina Mason Pulliam Charitable TrustIN13.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: Nina Mason Pulliam Charitable Trust · Arizona Community Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation ROSZTOCZY FOUNDATION funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
05Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: GARDEN HOUSE FOUNDATION.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
high risk
~1 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 2 filed years.
Track record & reputation
medium risk
2 years of Form 990 filings, still active.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 992555776 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on GARDEN HOUSE FOUNDATION, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- FlagFinancial stability— Roughly 1 months of cash on hand.
- On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2025; revenue grew over the period.
- On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 19% of their budget — diversified.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to Rosztoczy Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Rosztoczy Foundation through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines