Skip to content

· Private foundation

Rosemary M Front Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$42k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$82kYouth Development$79kEducation$78kHuman Services$39kHealth$34kArts & Culture$33kFood & Nutrition$30kRecreation & Sports$20kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $27k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $15k
$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$887k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TEMPLE SHALOM$15,000
WHEELING COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL$6,000
WHEELING HEALTH RIGHT$5,000
THE HOUSE OF THE CARPENTER$5,000
WEST LIBERTY UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC$4,000
OGLEBAY INSTITUTE$3,100
YOUNG LIFE OHIO VALLEY$3,000
SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DEPAUL$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $72k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%YOUTH SERVICES SYSTEM INC: $10k → 15%YOUTH SERVICES SYSTEM INC: $10k → 15%THE HOUSE OF THE CARPENTER: $7k → 15%THE HOUSE OF THE CARPENTER: $6k → 15%THE HOUSE OF THE CARPENTER: $5k → 15%YOUTH SERVICES SYSTEM INC: $5k → 15%HELPING HEROES INC: $5k → 15%THE HOUSE OF THE CARPENTER: $5k → 15%YOUTH SERVICES SYSTEM INC: $5k → 15%YOUTH SERVICES SYSTEM INC: $3k → 15%YOUTH SERVICES SYSTEM INC: $3k → 15%CATHOLIC CHARITIES WEST VIRGINIA: $3k → 15%YWCA WHEELING: $3k → 15%THE HOUSE OF THE CARPENTER: $2k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$370k · 15 repeat orgs$30k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +25% since the first grant, against +20% for those funded once.

15 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
4

Total granted

$370k
$29k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+25%
+20%

Still filing today

60%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEnvironmentEducationHealthRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • YS
    YOUTH SERVICES SYSTEM INC
    6× · 2018–2024 · $36k · revenue +28%
  • WH
    WHEELING HEALTH RIGHT INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $34k · revenue +24%
  • OI
    OGLEBAY INSTITUTE
    8× · 2017–2025 · $33k · revenue +25%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $18k
  • HH
    HELPING HEROES INC
    one grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue -7%
  • CC
    CATHOLIC CHARITIES WEST VIRGINIA INC
    one grant, 2020 · $3k · revenue +20%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Childrens Home of Wheeling Inc

To provide care to childen and their families through a range of services that promote healthy growth and improve the quality of family life

Human Services
2
Wayne County Community Services Organization

Establish, conduct, implement, operate, coordinate and finance programs for the benefit of the low-income, minority, elderly, disadvantaged and handicapped citizens of wayne county, wv

Community Improvement
3
Wcdc Inc

To help disabled and handicapped individuals to live in the least restrictive settings.

Human Services
4
St John's - St Vincent's Home for Chil

St john's home for children is a leader in delivering innovative and therapeutic services, in collaboration with our community partners and resources, to promote healing and growth for our children and family prosperity and resilience.

—
5
Westchester Institute for Human Development

The westchester institute for human development (wihd) creates better futures for people with disabilities, for vulnerable children, and for their families and caregivers. wihd accomplishes its mission through professional education,…

Health
6
Hospice Care Corporation D/B/a West Virginia Caring

To improve care for those facing life-limiting illness through direct support of patients and their families, public education and public advocacy.

—
7
Wv Helping Hands
Human Services
8
Wvhy Inc

The organization is a community-based mutual-aid nonprofit, providing supplies and support to people experiencing homelessness and advocating for compassionate, just, and collaborative solutions to homelessness.

Human Services
9
Communityworks in West Virginia Inc

Communityworks in west virignia (cwwv) creates housing and community development solutions for all west virginians through a network of member organizations. cwwv carries out its mission by providing effective training and technical…

Housing & Shelter
10
Who-Wheeler Housing Opportunity Foundation

Providing affordable housing for those in life transition

Housing & Shelter
11
The Wheelhouse Inc

Alcohol and drug rehabilitation

—
12
The Greater Wheeling Coalition for the Homeless Inc

To advance housing and human services to the homeless and to educate the community on the plight of homelessness in the area.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wheeling Health Right Inc; the most unlike its peers is Society of St Vincent Depaul Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
9/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TEMPLE SHALOM: $81,500 · OtherTEMPLE SHALOMYOUNG LIFE: $28,000 · OtherYOUNG LIFEMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF GREATER: $23,200 · OtherMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF GREATERIndividual grant recipient: $18,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $18,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientYOUNG LIFE OHIO VALLEY: $15,000 · OtherYOUNG LIFE OHIO VALLEYWEST LIBERTY UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $9,000 · Other+4 more: $15,500 · Other+4 moreYOUTH SERVICES SYSTEM INC: $36,400 · Human ServicesYOUTH SERVICES SYSTE…THE HOUSE OF THE CARPENTER INC: $25,000 · Human ServicesTHE HOUSE OF THE CAR…HELPING HEROES INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesHELPING HEROES INCCATHOLIC CHARITIES WEST VIRGINIA INC: $3,000 · Human ServicesYOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF WHEELING WV: $2,500 · Human ServicesWHEELING HEALTH RIGHT INC: $34,000 · HealthWHEELING …OGLEBAY INSTITUTE: $32,700 · EnvironmentOGLEBAY I…WHEELING COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL: $32,000 · EducationWHEELING …OGLEBAY FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$208,700Human Services$71,900Health$34,000Environment$32,700Education$32,000Recreation & Sports$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetYOUTH SERVICES SYSTEM INC: $36,400 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetWHEELING HEALTH RIGHT INC: $34,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetOGLEBAY INSTITUTE: $32,700 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetWHEELING COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL: $32,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetTHE HOUSE OF THE CARPENTER INC: $25,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetOGLEBAY FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetWEST LIBERTY UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $9,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE KING'S DAUGHTERS CHILD CARE CENTERS INC: $5,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHELPING HEROES INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTHE SOUP KITCHEN OF GREATER WHEELING INC: $5,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES WEST VIRGINIA INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF WHEELING WV: $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds YOUTH SERVICES SYSTEM INC ↗
  • Who funds WHEELING HEALTH RIGHT INC ↗
  • Who funds OGLEBAY INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds WHEELING COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds THE HOUSE OF THE CARPENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds OGLEBAY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds WEST LIBERTY UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE KING'S DAUGHTERS CHILD CARE CENTERS INC ↗
  • Who funds HELPING HEROES INC ↗
  • Who funds THE SOUP KITCHEN OF GREATER WHEELING INC ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES WEST VIRGINIA INC ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF WHEELING WV ↗
  • Who funds SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DEPAUL INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Raymond A & Gertrude D Hyer FoundationWV26.4× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Raymond A & Gertrude D Hyer Foundation · Albert Schenk III & Kathleen H Schenk Charitable Trust · August J & Thelma S Hoffmann Foundation · Community Foundation for the Ohio Valley Inc · Francis J and Edith Jackson Founda Security National Trust Company · Hess Family Foundation · Robert L and Helen E Levenson Family Charit Fndtn · Robinson S Parlin Trust · Robert L& Helen E Levenson Family Charitable Tr · Vna Home Support Services Inc · The Driehorst Family Foundation · United Way of the Upper Ohio Valley Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Rosemary M Front Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Rosemary M Front Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Rosemary M Front’s filings →

    More from the funding graph