Skip to content

· Private foundation

Rosemary and Ted Lassiter Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$351k
Granted FY2024still arriving
14
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
0185% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Education$952kHousing & Shelter$395kEmployment$200kAnimals$130kFood & Nutrition$113kHuman Services$93kHealth$84kYouth Development$81kOther$0
02FY2024 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $6k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $120k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $225k
$10,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ECKERD CONNECTS$100,000
SERVIAM GIRLS ACADEMY$75,000
SALESIANUM SCHOOL FOR BOYS$50,000
THE LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR$25,000
FOOD BANK OF DELAWARE$20,000
SUNDAY BREAKFAST MISSION$15,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF DELAWARE$10,000
FATHER TRAINOR SCHOLARSHIP FUND$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
SALVATION ARMY$10,000
LIMEN HOUSE INC$10,000
ARTISTS SPACE$5,000
URSULINE ACADEMY$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–24, $200k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%ECKERD CONNECTS: $100k → 12%ECKERD CONNECTS: $100k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
NY
PA
DE
AZ
TN
DC
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.5M · 18 repeat orgs$245k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +29% since the first grant, against +5% for those funded once.

18 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
6

Total granted

$2.5M
$245k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+29%
+5%

Still filing today

56%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
Housing & ShelterFood & NutritionArts & CultureHuman ServicesEnvironmentCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EY
    ECKERD YOUTH ALTERNATIVES INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $200k · revenue +29%
  • UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE
    3× · 2021–2023 · $160k · revenue +22%
  • FB
    FOOD BANK OF DELAWARE INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $113k · revenue +78%

Funded once

  • SA
    SERVIAM ACADEMY
    one grant, 2023 · $125k
  • FI
    FLORENCE IMMIGRANT & REFUGEE RIGHTS PROJECT INC
    one grant, 2022 · $50k · revenue -37%
  • GI
    GREENPEACE INC
    one grant, 2019 · $30k · revenue +5%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Delaware State University

Delaware state university is a public, comprehensive, 1890 land-grant institution that offers access and opportunity to diverse populations from delaware, the nation, and the world. (continued on schedule o.)building on its heritage as a…

Education
2
Albright College

As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.

Education
3
Women's Law Project

Women's law project creates a more just and equitable society by advancing the rights and status of all women throughout their lives. to this end, we engage in high-impact litigation, advocacy, and education. the core values of women's law…

Civil Rights
4
Floresta Usa Incorporated

Plant with purpose, a christian nonprofit organization, reverses deforestation and poverty around the world by transforming the lives of the rural poor. we do this through: - watershed restoration & regenerative agriculture - savings…

International
5
Delaware Valley University

See schedule o.we are inspired by the ideals of our founder who, in 1896, emphasized respect for all people and ideas, who honored knowledge with practice, progress and the common good. our historical commitment to experiential learning…

—
6
Project Drawdown

Project drawdown's mission is to drive meaningful climate action by advancing science-based solutions and strategies. project drawdown's work is focused on three pillars: science - advancing science-based climate solutions and strategies;…

Education
7
Friends of the Earth

Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…

Environment
8
The Population Council Inc

We generate ideas, produce evidence, and design solutions to improve the lives of underserved populations around the world. we take a multidisciplinary, intergenerational, life-cycle approach that contributes to (see schedule o)four global…

International
9
International Bridges to Justice

In recognition of the fundamental principles of the universal declaration of human rights, international bridges to justice (ibj) is dedicated to protecting the basic legal rights of ordinary citizens in developing countries. specifically,…

Crime & Legal
10
Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Foundation

To engage and catalyze global seafood supply chains in rebuilding depleted fish stocks and reducing the environmental impacts of fishing and fish farming.

Animals
11
Rights and Resources Institute Inc

Rri's mission is to support local communities and indigenous peoples' struggles against poverty and marginalization by promoting greater global commitment and action towards policy, market, and legal reforms that secure their rights to…

Environment
12
Meridian International Center

Meridian international center is a nonpartisan diplomacy institution founded in 1960 to advance american leadership. headquartered on a historic campus in washington dc, our mission is to empower leaders to advance the next era of…

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Boys & Girls Clubs of Delaware Inc; the most unlike its peers is Sahar Education. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
10/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SALESIANUM SCHOOL FOR BOYS: $305,000 · OtherSALESIANUM SCHOOL FOR BOYSIndividual grant recipient: $298,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSERVIAM GIRLS ACADEMY INC: $225,000 · OtherSERVIAM GIRLS ACADEMY INCIndividual grant recipient: $162,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientUNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE: $160,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF DELAWARESERVIAM ACADEMY: $125,000 · OtherSERVIAM ACADEMYFATHER TRAINOR SCHOLARSHIP FUND: $112,000 · OtherFATHER TRAINOR SCHOLARSHIP FUNDIndividual grant recipient: $110,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTHE SALVATION ARMY: $93,000 · OtherSunday Breakfast Mission: $90,000 · OtherLIMEN HOUSE INC: $84,000 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF DELAWARE INC: $81,000 · Other+6 more: $180,000 · Other+6 moreLITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR INC: $305,000 · Housing & ShelterLITTLE SISTE…ECKERD YOUTH ALTERNATIVES INC: $200,000 · Human ServicesFOOD BANK OF DELAWARE INC: $113,000 · Food & NutritionSAHAR EDUCATION: $81,000 · InternationalARTISTS SPACE INC: $80,000 · Arts & CultureFLORENCE IMMIGRANT & REFUGEE RIGHTS PROJECT INC: $50,000 · Crime & LegalNATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY INC: $20,000 · Environment
Other$2,025,000Housing & Shelter$305,000Human Services$200,000Food & Nutrition$113,000International$81,000Arts & Culture$80,000Crime & Legal$50,000Environment$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR INC: $305,000 over 6y, 1.5% of budgetSERVIAM GIRLS ACADEMY INC: $225,000 over 4y, 8.0% of budgetECKERD YOUTH ALTERNATIVES INC: $200,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE: $160,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD BANK OF DELAWARE INC: $113,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetSunday Breakfast Mission: $90,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetLIMEN HOUSE INC: $84,000 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetSAHAR EDUCATION: $81,000 over 4y, 21% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF DELAWARE INC: $81,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetARTISTS SPACE INC: $80,000 over 6y, 1.3% of budgetDian Fossey Gorilla Fund International Inc: $66,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetFLORENCE IMMIGRANT & REFUGEE RIGHTS PROJECT INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGREENPEACE INC: $30,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR INC ↗
  • Who funds SERVIAM GIRLS ACADEMY INC ↗
  • Who funds ECKERD YOUTH ALTERNATIVES INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE ↗
  • Who funds FOOD BANK OF DELAWARE INC ↗
  • Who funds Sunday Breakfast Mission ↗
  • Who funds LIMEN HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds SAHAR EDUCATION ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF DELAWARE INC ↗
  • Who funds ARTISTS SPACE INC ↗
  • Who funds Dian Fossey Gorilla Fund International Inc ↗
  • Who funds FLORENCE IMMIGRANT & REFUGEE RIGHTS PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds GREENPEACE INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Laffey-McHugh FoundationDE17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Laffey-McHugh Foundation · The Anthony & Catherine Fusco Foundation · United Way of Delaware · Welfare Foundation Inc · The Huisking Foundation Inc · Longwood Foundation Inc · Delaware Community Foundation Inc · Bacchieri Foundation · Marmot Foundation · Crestlea Foundation Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Rosemary and Ted Lassiter Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Rosemary and Ted Lassiter Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →median 26%
  • Limen House Inc: 38% of income from government
  • Boys & Girls Clubs of Delaware Inc: 33% of income from government
  • University of Delaware: 30% of income from government
  • Food Bank of Delaware Inc: 26% of income from government
  • Eckerd Youth Alternatives Inc: 12% of income from government
  • Little Sisters of the Poor Inc: 5% of income from government
  • Serviam Girls Academy Inc: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2024, the most recent year this funder made grants.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Rosemary and Ted Lassiter’s filings →

More from the funding graph