Skip to content
Roseman Family Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Roseman Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$10k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$1k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Animals$45kYouth Development$8kPublic Safety & Disaster$4kInternational$3kPhilanthropy$3kEnvironment$2kEducation$2kHealth$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$209k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
All 4 Cats$1,000
Friends of Felines$1,000
CAT Adoption Team$1,000
Atlanta International IHOT Robotics$1,000
RescueConnect Animal Rescue$1,000
Ruffian Foundation$1,000
World Central Kitchen$1,000
Adopt An Angel$1,000
St James UMC$1,000
Paypal Charitable Giving Fund$585
Cape Fear Five Star Project$100
Best Friends Animal Sanctuary$100
Noahs Ark Rescue$35
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–20, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%YMCA of the Triangle: $1k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
NY
UT
MD
NC
SC
DC
LA
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$60k · 17 repeat orgs$8k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +36% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

17 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
12

Total granted

$60k
$8k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+36%
0%

Still filing today

71%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $100 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsInternationalYouth DevelopmentEnvironmentHuman ServicesPublic Safety & DisasterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RA
    RESCUECONNECT ANIMAL RESCUE
    7× · 2019–2025 · $9k · revenue +74%
  • AA
    ADOPT AN ANGEL
    7× · 2019–2025 · $8k · revenue +99%
  • WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $4k · revenue +36%

Funded once

  • UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF
    one grant, 2022 · $2k · revenue -21%
  • CC
    Craven Cty Health Depmt Foundation
    one grant, 2021 · $2k
  • TY
    The Young Men's Christian Association of the Triangle Area Inc (4598)graduated
    one grant, 2020 · $1k · revenue +88%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Carolina Animal Network

we are a small animal rescue. We help the community by assisting with vet care and rehoming animals they cannot keep. We also pull dogs cats kittens and puppies from local kill shelters when they run out of space, we provide those animals…

Animals
2
Animals First Rescue of the Carolinas Inc

Rescue unwanted dogs and cats from high kill shelters and other dire circumstances. Provide veterinary care shelter and love until the pet is placed into an appropriate new home.

Animals
3
Kitten Around Cat Rescue
Animals
4
Unos Home for Wayward Cats and Dogs

Animal rescue organization

Animals
5
Cocoa Kitties

Animal rescue

Animals
6
Meows and Mutts Rescue

We are an animal rescue who takes dogs and cats from high kill shelters, off the streets and owner surrenders and get them vetted and adopted and we transport them out of high volume areas to the northeast.

Animals
7
Global Canine and Feline Rescue Association Inc

We rescue cats and dogs suffered on the street and in endangered locations in both new york and china. the mission of our no-kill shelter is to provide stray cats with safe haven and veterinary care before placing them in forever loving…

Animals
8
Fur Ever Home Cat Sanctuary

Provide loving care & home for approx 120 Feral Cats that are in danger out in streets/unadoptable. TNR projects for feral cat colonies around Horry County. Provide Vet & medication care for animals in-house.

Animals
9
Carolina Cat Rescue

Carolina Cat Rescue's mission is to help the unwanted cats and kittens of North Carolina that end up at county shelters or are in need of rescue. We partner with no-kill reputable cat rescues in the Northeast and transport the cats there.…

Animals
10
For Every Rescue a Life Saved

To manage feral and stray cat populations. The process involves trapping the cats in a humane manner, getting them spayed or neutered, vaccinated against rabies, and then returning them to their original location.

Animals
11
Animal Rescuers Without Borders

Battling against the overpopulation of homeless pets and improving the lives of companion animals through rescue, fostering programs, adoption, pet care, educational programs and of course spaying and neutering.

Animals
12
Companion Animal Coalition

Animal rescue, Trap, neuter and release of cats and to assist pet owners with emergency medical expenses to keep the pet at home with them so that it does not have to be surrendered.

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Alley Cat Allies Inc; the most unlike its peers is Colonial Capital Humane Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/22
Grantees still filing
13/22
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

RESCUECONNECT ANIMAL RESCUE: $9,450 · AnimalsRESCUECONNECT ANIMAL RESCUEADOPT AN ANGEL: $7,500 · AnimalsADOPT AN ANGELCAT ADOPTION TEAM: $7,000 · AnimalsCAT ADOPTION TEAMAll 4 Cats Inc: $5,900 · AnimalsAll 4 Cats IncFRIENDS OF FELINES: $4,700 · AnimalsFRIENDS OF FELINES+6 more: $1,959 · Animals+6 moreRUFFIAN FOUNDATION: $6,000 · OtherRUFFIAN FOUNDATIONSt James UMC: $3,000 · OtherSt James UMCAtlanta International IHOT Robotics: $2,000 · OtherAtlanta International IHOT R…Outward Bound Inc: $2,000 · OtherOutward Bound IncCOLONIAL CAPITAL HUMANE SOCIETY: $1,775 · OtherCOLONIAL CAPITAL HUMANE SOCI…Craven Cty Health Depmt Foundation: $1,700 · OtherCraven Cty Health Depmt Foun…Garber United Methodist Church: $950 · Other+4 more: $400 · OtherWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $4,000 · InternationalWORLD CENTR…UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $2,092 · InternationalUNITED STAT…MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $1,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SA…Boy Scouts of America 92 Atlanta Area Council: $3,000 · Youth DevelopmentPAYPAL CHARITABLE GIVING FUND: $2,459 · Philanthropy+1 more: $50 · PhilanthropyOUTWARD BOUND INC: $2,000 · EnvironmentThe Young Men's Christian Association of the Triangle Area Inc (4598): $1,000 · Human ServicesUnited Cajun Navy: $250 · Public Safety & Disaster
Animals$36,509Other$17,825International$7,092Youth Development$3,000Philanthropy$2,509Environment$2,000Human Services$1,000Public Safety & Disaster$250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetRESCUECONNECT ANIMAL RESCUE: $9,450 over 7y, 2.9% of budgetADOPT AN ANGEL: $7,500 over 7y, 0.6% of budgetCAT ADOPTION TEAM: $7,000 over 7y, 6.1% of budgetAll 4 Cats Inc: $5,900 over 6y, 1.6% of budgetFRIENDS OF FELINES: $4,700 over 7y, 1.1% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $4,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBoy Scouts of America 92 Atlanta Area Council: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPAYPAL CHARITABLE GIVING FUND: $2,459 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $2,092 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOUTWARD BOUND INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOLONIAL CAPITAL HUMANE SOCIETY: $1,775 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetThe Young Men's Christian Association of the Triangle Area Inc (4598): $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY: $600 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetAlley Cat Allies Inc: $450 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPAW PRINTS ANIMAL RESCUE INC: $420 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetUnited Cajun Navy: $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBrother Wolf Animal Rescue Inc: $204 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWilmington Animal Centrix: $200 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetFRANS FELINES INC: $100 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetNOAH'S ARKS RESCUE: $85 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER GOOD CHARITIES: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Ge Aerospace Foundati…Paypal Charitable Giv…Network for GoodThe Pfizer Foundation…The Bank of America C…Vanguard Charitable E…American Online Givin…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Ge Aerospace FoundationCT13.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Ge Aerospace Foundation · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Network for Good · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Roseman Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Roseman Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Roseman Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home