· Private foundation
Rosebury Charitable Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k10 grants · $208k
- $250k+1 grant · $800k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| John 316 | $800,000 |
| Oklahoma Food Bank | $25,000 |
| Health Outreach Prevention Education H O P E | $25,000 |
| Special Olympics Oklahoma | $25,000 |
| Meals on Wheels | $25,000 |
| Emerging Eagles | $20,000 |
| The Spring Shelter | $20,000 |
| Tulsa Day Center for the Homeless | $20,000 |
| FCA | $20,000 |
| American Red Cross | $15,000 |
| Nevus Outreach | $12,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $250k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +58% since the first grant, against +42% for the ones you funded once.
20 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
Meals on Wheels of Norman Inc6× · 2017–2024 · $135k · revenue +46%- TSTHE SPRING SHELTER INC6× · 2017–2024 · $115k · revenue +395%
- ANAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches6× · 2017–2024 · $110k · revenue +46%
Funded once
- HPHANNA PUBLIC SCHOOLS ACT FUNDone grant, 2022 · $28k
- RCResonance Center for Women Incone grant, 2023 · $15k · revenue +22%
- ORO R U GOLDEN EAGLE CLUB INCgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $12k · revenue +42%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The tulsa area united way unites people and resources to improve lives and strengthen our communities.
Goodwill empowers people to reach their full potential through work opportunities, training, and support services.
Lighthouse Behavioral Wellness Centers, Inc. serves the community behavioral health needs of nine counties of Southern Oklahoma. Lighthouse offers integrated care through their outpatient and Health Home programs to adults and children.…
To provide a comprehensive continuum of behavioral health services, grounded in evidence, responsive to personal need, and empowering personal change for those who have been affected by substance use or co-occurring disorders.
To partner with leaders globally to boldly proclaim the biblical truth of the father's heart for life, champion the gospel of jesus christ, and establish life-giving ministries.
Drug rehabilitation and services based on technology developed by l. ron hubbard.
The Tulsa SPCA's mission is to improve the lives of dogs and cats, and their human companions.
The Virtue Center is a place of help and hope for people facing addiction and mental health challenges.
La Luz Organization helps the underserved Latino population in Oklahoma with culturally and faith based trauma-informed services to victims of domestic violence,sexual assault and stalking.
In Tulsa County there are several agencies that address prevention and treatment of child abuse, but the Child Advocacy Network (CAN) is the ONLY nonprofit that provides intervention services for children and their nonoffending…
Tulsa CARES is committed to delivering tailored and integrated programs and services that support clients in accessing medical care, achieving treatment adherence, experiencing improved health outcomes, and living an enhanced quality of…
To provide quality, compassionate treatment for substance abuse and addiction which promotes sustained recovery for adolescents, women and their families.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is 12 & 12 Inc and the most unlike its peers is O R U Golden Eagle Club Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Meals on Wheels of Norman Inc ↗
- Who funds THE SPRING SHELTER INC ↗
- Who funds TULSA DAY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
- Who funds NEVUS OUTREACH INC ↗
- Who funds FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES ↗
- Who funds Special Olympics Oklahoma Inc ↗
- Who funds HOPE IS ALIVE MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds The University of Tulsa ↗
- Who funds ORAL ROBERTS UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds Resonance Center for Women Inc ↗
- Who funds O R U GOLDEN EAGLE CLUB INC ↗
- Who funds BROKEN ARROW NEIGHBORS INC ↗
- Who funds A NEW LEAF INC ↗
- Who funds 12 & 12 INC ↗
- Who funds Health Outreach Prevention Education Inc ↗
- Who funds NATUREWORKS INC ↗
- Who funds PAUSE4PAWS INC ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR ACTION AND CONTEMPLATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Ralph and Frances McGill Foundation the Trust Company of Oklahoma · Tulsa Community Foundation · The Anne and Henry Zarrow Foundation · Grace & Franklin Bernsen Foundation · The Hardesty Family Foundation Inc · Tulsa Fdn Gen Fd Xxxxx8000 · Morningcrest Healthcare Foundation · Mervin Bovaird Foundation · The Gelvin Foundation · Oneok Foundation Inc · Common Bond Foundation · One Gas Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Rosebury Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Tulsa Day Center Inc — 9% of income from government
- The University of Tulsa — 5% of income from government
- Oral Roberts University — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.