Skip to content

· Private foundation

Rose and Lawrence C Page Sr Family Charitable Foundation C/O Mr M Rice

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$273k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$866kHuman Services$343kEducation$308kFood & Nutrition$232kCrime & Legal$140kHousing & Shelter$73kYouth Development$60kPublic Benefit$30kOther$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $23k
  • $10k–50k11 grants · $250k
$20,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$4.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
McLAREN MACOMB HOSPITAL$30,000
WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING$30,000
GLEANERS COMMUNITY FOOD BANK$25,000
TURNING POINT INC$25,000
CARE HOUSE$25,000
MT CLEMENS SALVATION ARMY$25,000
HENRY FORD MACOMB HOSPITALS$25,000
ARC SERVICES OF MACOMB INC$20,000
REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN$20,000
THE CAPUCHIN SOUP KITCHEN$15,000
ELE'S PLACE$10,000
ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL$6,600
FORGOTTEN HARVEST$6,600
ST JOSEPH CATHOLIC SCHOOL$5,000
ST MARY MAGDALEN CHURCH$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 45% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 11%McLAREN MACOMB HOSPITAL: $40k → 10%REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $30k → 14%McLAREN MACOMB HOSPITAL: $30k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN DEPT OF INTERNAL MEDICINE: $30k → 14%WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING: $30k → 21%McLAREN MACOMB HOSPITAL: $30k → 10%REGENTS OF THE INUVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $30k → 14%WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING: $30k → 21%McLAREN MACOMB HOSPITAL: $30k → 10%REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $30k → 14%WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING: $30k → 21%McLAREN MACOMB HOSPITAL: $30k → 10%REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $20k → 14%WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING: $25k → 21%McLAREN MACOMB HOSPITAL: $30k → 10%REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $20k → 14%WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING: $25k → 21%McLAREN MACOMB HOSPITAL: $30k → 10%REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $20k → 14%WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING: $25k → 21%McLAREN MACOMB HOSPITAL: $30k → 10%REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $20k → 14%WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING: $25k → 21%MT CLEMENS SALVATION ARMY: $25k → 10%REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $20k → 14%WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING: $25k → 21%CARE HOUSE: $25k → 10%WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING: $25k → 21%CARE HOUSE: $25k → 10%CARE HOUSE: $23k → 10%MT CLEMENS SALVATION ARMY: $20k → 10%GLEANERS COMMUNITY FOOD BANK: $25k → 21%MT CLEMENS SALVATION ARMY: $20k → 10%GLEANERS COMMUNITY FOOD BANK: $20k → 21%MT CLEMENS SALVATION ARMY: $20k → 10%GLEANERS COMMUNITY FOOD BANK: $20k → 21%MT CLEMENS SALVATION ARMY: $20k → 10%MT CLEMENS SALVATION ARMY: $20k → 10%MT CLEMENS SALVATION ARMY: $20k → 10%HENRY FORD MACOMB HOSPITALS: $25k → 10%HENRY FORD MACOMB HOSPITALS: $25k → 10%HENRY FORD MACOMB HOSPITALS: $25k → 10%HENRY FORD MACOMB HOSPITALS: $25k → 10%HENRY FORD MACOMB HOSPITALS: $25k → 10%HENRY FORD MACOMB HOSPITALS: $25k → 10%ARC SERVICES OF MACOMB INC: $20k → 10%ARC SERVICES OF MACOMB INC: $20k → 10%ARC SERVICES OF MACOMB INC: $20k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.0M · 20 repeat orgs$72k to everyone else

20 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
3

Total granted

$2.0M
$65k

Still filing today

45%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthFood & NutritionHuman ServicesCrime & LegalYouth DevelopmentRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AS
    ARC SERVICES OF MACOMB INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $170k · revenue +18%
  • TP
    TURNING POINT INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $165k · revenue +98%
  • CO
    CAREHOUSE OF OAKLAND COUNTY INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $140k · revenue +40%

Funded once

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN DEPT OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
    one grant, 2017 · $30k
  • RO
    REGENTS OF THE INUVERSITY OF MICHIGAN
    one grant, 2018 · $30k
  • YO
    YMCA OF METRO DETROIT
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Michigan Assoc of Community Mental Health Boards

Assisting the community mental health boards of michigan in developing methods for mental health planning, care and treatment.

—
2
Hospice of Michigan Inc

Hospice of Michigan, Inc. meets our patients and families where they are with urgency, purpose and compassionate accountability surrounding them with decades of dedicated hospice expertise.

Human Services
3
Michigan Farm Bureau

Michigan farm bureau (mfb) is a member directed agricultural organization whose purpose is to represent, protect, and enhance the business, economic, social, and educational interests of our members located throughout the state of michigan.

—
4
Mymichigan Medical Group

Creating healthy communities - together

Health
5
Mymichigan Health Foundation

The corporation is organized and shall be operated exclusively for charitable, educational and scientific purposes by conducting or supporting activites exclusively for the benefit of, to perform the functions of, or to carry out the…

Health
6
Michigan Enviromental Council

Informing and educating the public and decision makers about environmental issues.

Environment
7
Mclaren Northern Michigan

Mclaren health care, through its subsidiaries, will be the best value in health care as defined by quality outcomes and cost.

Health
8
Michigan Farmers Market Association

Mifma supports the viability of all community-driven marketplaces so that they can connect all consumers to local farms and businesses.

Food & Nutrition
9
Mclaren Port Huron

Mclaren healthcare, through its subsidiaries, will be the best value in healthcare as defined by quality outcomes and cost.

Health
10
Business Leaders for Michigan

Business leaders for michigan is a nonprofit, nonpartisan statewide organization driven by ceos from the state's leading employers, all working toward a shared goal: making michigan a top 10 state for jobs, talent and a thriving economy.…

—
11
Mymichigan Medical Center Midland

Creating healthy communities - together

Health
12
Mymichigan Health

Creating healthy communities - together

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ele's Place Inc; the most unlike its peers is Macomb County Warming Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/11
Grantees still filing
7/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

McLAREN MACOMB HOSPITAL: $250,000 · OtherMcLAREN MACOMB HOSPITALWAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING: $240,000 · OtherWAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF ENGINEERINGMT CLEMENS SALVATION ARMY: $172,500 · OtherMT CLEMENS SALVATION ARMYARC SERVICES OF MACOMB INC: $170,000 · OtherARC SERVICES OF MACOMB INCREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $160,000 · OtherREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGANHENRY FORD MACOMB HOSPITALS: $150,000 · OtherHENRY FORD MACOMB HOSPITALSTHE CAPUCHIN SOUP KITCHEN: $75,000 · OtherMACOMB COUNTY WARMING CENTER: $72,500 · Other+7 more: $151,000 · Other+7 moreTURNING POINT INC: $165,000 · Human ServicesGLEANERS COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN: $150,000 · Food & NutritionFORGOTTEN HARVEST INC: $6,600 · Food & NutritionCAREHOUSE OF OAKLAND COUNTY INC: $140,000 · Crime & LegalST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $72,469 · HealthHENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM: $20,000 · HealthON MY OWN OF MICHIGAN: $13,500 · HealthELE'S PLACE INC: $60,000 · Youth DevelopmentSPECIAL OLYMPICS MICHIGAN INC: $15,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$1,441,000Human Services$165,000Food & Nutrition$156,600Crime & Legal$140,000Health$105,969Youth Development$60,000Recreation & Sports$15,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetARC SERVICES OF MACOMB INC: $170,000 over 9y, 0.7% of budgetTURNING POINT INC: $165,000 over 9y, 0.5% of budgetGLEANERS COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN: $150,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetCAREHOUSE OF OAKLAND COUNTY INC: $140,000 over 9y, 0.8% of budgetMACOMB COUNTY WARMING CENTER: $72,500 over 6y, 5.5% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $72,469 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetELE'S PLACE INC: $60,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetHENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetON MY OWN OF MICHIGAN: $13,500 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetFORGOTTEN HARVEST INC: $6,600 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ARC SERVICES OF MACOMB INC ↗
  • Who funds TURNING POINT INC ↗
  • Who funds GLEANERS COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN ↗
  • Who funds CAREHOUSE OF OAKLAND COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds MACOMB COUNTY WARMING CENTER ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds ELE'S PLACE INC ↗
  • Who funds HENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM ↗
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS MICHIGAN INC ↗
  • Who funds ON MY OWN OF MICHIGAN ↗
  • Who funds FORGOTTEN HARVEST INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way for Southeastern MichiganMI13.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way for Southeastern Michigan · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Rose and Lawrence C Page Sr Family Charitable Foundation C/O Mr M Rice funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Rose and Lawrence C Page Sr Family Charitable Foundation C/O Mr M Rice. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Rose and Lawrence C Page Sr Family Charitable Foundation C/O Mr M Rice’s filings →

    More from the funding graph