Skip to content
Rosa C & Henry a Sauter Schl Fd #8 at a glance

· Private foundation

Rosa C & Henry a Sauter Schl Fd #8

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$57k
Granted FY2025still arriving
18
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Education$275k
02FY2025 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SUNY ONEONTA$8,125
Individual grant recipient$7,598
SUNY BINGHAMTON$5,167
NEW YORK UNIVERSITY$4,063
THE COLLEGE OF NEW JERSEY$4,063
NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY$4,063
UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS DARTMOUTH$4,063
CLARK UNIVERSITY$4,000
UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO$2,000
MANHATTAN COLLEGE$2,000
GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY$2,000
HOWARD UNIVERSITY$1,549
Individual grant recipient$1,500
WENTWORTH INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY$1,500
MERCY COLLEGE$1,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 67% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%CLARK UNIVERSITY: $4k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS DARTMOUTH: $4k → 11%HAMPSHIRE COLLEGE: $2k → 12%NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY: $4k → 16%PENN STATE UNIVERSITY: $4k → 16%STONY BROOK UNIVERSITY: $4k → 7%MERCY COLLEGE: $2k → 9%UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO: $2k → 13%SUNY ONEONTA: $8k → 13%UNIVERISTY AT ALBANY: $2k → 14%DOMINICAN COLLEGE: $4k → 14%SUNY CORTLAND: $1k → 15%SUNY NEW PLATZ: $8k → 16%FASHION INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $4k → 17%SUNY BINGHAMTON: $5k → 20%MANHATTAN COLLEGE: $2k → 28%HOWARD UNIVERSITY: $3k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT: $2k → 11%THE COLLEGE OF NEW JERSEY: $4k → 11%GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $2k → 4%UNIVERSITY OF RICHMOND: $4k → 22%NORWICH UNIVERSITY: $4k → 9%WENTWORTH INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $2k → 16%MANHATTANVILLE UNIVERSITY: $1k → 9%NEW YORK UNIVERSITY: $4k → 17%BINGHAMTON UNIVERSITY: $4k → 20%HOWARD UNIVERSITY: $2k → 14%GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $2k → 4%BOSTON UNIVERSITY: $2k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
NY
MA
PA
NJ
CT
CO
NE
VA
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$235k · 22 repeat orgs$40k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +19% since the first grant, against +16% for those funded once.

22 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
6

Total granted

$235k
$17k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+19%
+16%

Still filing today

55%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 59% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $24k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MU
    MERCY UNIVERSITY
    6× · 2020–2025 · $22k · revenue +7%
  • THE HOWARD UNIVERSITY
    6× · 2020–2025 · $20k · revenue +40%
  • TG
    The George Washington University
    6× · 2020–2025 · $18k · revenue +22%

Funded once

  • MU
    MERCY UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2024 · $5k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS
    one grant, 2024 · $4k
  • FI
    FASHION INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $4k · revenue -20%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Western New England University

Western new england university, a comprehensive private institution with a tradition of excellence in teaching and scholarship and a commitment to service, awards undergraduate, master's, and doctoral degrees in various departments from…

Education
2
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
3
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
4
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
5
Bentley University

Organization's mission bentley university believes good business can impact more than the bottom line - it can change the world. bentley is a community of future business leaders who will deliver value in the marketplace and lasting…

Education
6
The Catholic University of America

As the national university of the catholic church in the united states, founded and sponsored by the bishops of the country with the approval of the holy see, the catholic university of america is committed to being a comprehensive…

Education
7
Trustees of Dartmouth College

Dartmouth College educates the most promising students and prepares them for a lifetime of learning and of responsible leadership, through a faculty dedicated to teaching and the creation of knowledge.

Education
8
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
9
Trustees of Boston College

Mission strengthened by more than a century and a half of dedication to academic excellence, boston college commits itself to the highest standards of teaching and research in undergraduate, graduate and professional programs and to the…

Education
10
Albright College

As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.

Education
11
Trustees of Tufts College

Education and Research

Education
12
Seton Hall University

Seton hall university is a catholic institution of higher education

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Manhattanville University; the most unlike its peers is New York University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
12/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO: $16,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY AT BUFFALOWESTERN CONNECTICUT STATE UNIVERSITY: $14,000 · OtherWESTERN CONNECTICUT STATE UNIVERSITYSTONY BROOK UNIVERSITY: $12,250 · OtherSTONY BROOK UNIVERSITYSUNY ONEONTA: $11,660 · OtherSUNY ONEONTABINGHAMTON UNIVERSITY: $9,500 · OtherBINGHAMTON UNIVERSITYFASHION INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $8,750 · OtherFASHION INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGYDOMINICAN UNIVERSITY NEW YORK: $8,750 · OtherDOMINICAN UNIVERSITY NEW YORKIndividual grant recipient: $8,563 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $7,598 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSUNY BINGHAMTON: $7,167 · OtherPENN STATE UNIVERSITY: $7,000 · Other+10 more: $31,106 · Other+10 moreMERCY UNIVERSITY: $21,500 · EducationMERCY UNIVERSITYTHE HOWARD UNIVERSITY: $20,000 · EducationTHE HOWARD UNIVERSITYThe George Washington University: $17,750 · EducationThe George Washington UniversityNORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY: $16,877 · EducationNORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITYTRUSTEES OF CLARK UNIVERSITY: $16,000 · EducationTRUSTEES OF CLARK UNIVERSITYManhattan University: $12,000 · EducationManhattan UniversityHAMPSHIRE COLLEGE TRUSTEES: $7,000 · EducationNorwich University: $5,250 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF RICHMOND: $5,250 · Education+5 more: $11,230 · Education+5 more
Other$142,344Education$132,857

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMERCY UNIVERSITY: $21,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HOWARD UNIVERSITY: $20,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetThe George Washington University: $17,750 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY: $16,877 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF CLARK UNIVERSITY: $16,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetManhattan University: $12,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetDOMINICAN UNIVERSITY NEW YORK: $8,750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHAMPSHIRE COLLEGE TRUSTEES: $7,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNorwich University: $5,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF RICHMOND: $5,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFASHION INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY FOUNDATION: $3,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetST THOMAS AQUINAS COLLEGE: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWENTWORTH INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTemple University - Of The Commonwealth System of Higher Education: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMANHATTANVILLE UNIVERSITY: $1,167 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MERCY UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds THE HOWARD UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds The George Washington University ↗
  • Who funds NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF CLARK UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Manhattan University ↗
  • Who funds DOMINICAN UNIVERSITY NEW YORK ↗
  • Who funds HAMPSHIRE COLLEGE TRUSTEES ↗
  • Who funds Norwich University ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF RICHMOND ↗
  • Who funds New York University ↗
  • Who funds FASHION INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds ST THOMAS AQUINAS COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds WENTWORTH INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY INC ↗
  • Who funds Temple University - Of The Commonwealth System of Higher Education ↗
  • Who funds MANHATTANVILLE UNIVERSITY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Vanguard Charitable E…American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Amazonsmile Foundation
Vanguard Charitable Endowment ProgramPA8.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Rosa C & Henry a Sauter Schl Fd #8 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Rosa C & Henry a Sauter Schl Fd #8. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • Norwich University: 14% of income from government
  • Trustees of Boston University: 12% of income from government
  • Northeastern University: 4% of income from government
  • Wentworth Institute of Technology Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Trustees of Clark University: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Rosa C & Henry a Sauter Schl Fd #8’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home