Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Rooted Alliance Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$6.1M
Granted FY2024still arriving
18
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$1.1M
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192024.

Education$21MPhilanthropy$5.7MEmployment$990kPublic Benefit$100kCommunity Improvement$77k
02FY2024 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $50k–250k9 grants · $1.0M
  • $250k+9 grants · $5.1M
$250,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$2.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OZARKS TECHNICAL COMMUNITY COLLEGE$1,094,756
OZARKS TECHNICAL COMMUNITY COLLEGE$925,779
COMMUNITIES FOUNDATION OF TEXAS$665,304
EDUCATION SERVICE CENTER REGION 1 OF TEXAS$533,830
CITIZENS FOR EDUCATION EXCELLENCE INC$432,490
CITIZENS FOR EDUCATION EXCELLENCE INC$398,323
WEST CENTRAL TEXAS WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT BOARD INC$391,782
WEST CENTRAL TEXAS WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT BOARD INC$390,625
MISSOURI COLLEGE AND CAREER ATTAINMENT NETWORK$250,000
Individual grant recipient$170,788
KILGORE COLLEGE$141,740
TETON HIGH SCHOOL$140,352
KILGORE COLLEGE$115,994
Individual grant recipient$105,082
NATIONAL GOVERNORS ASSOCIATION$100,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY19–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 93% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%WORKFORCE SOLUTIONS OF WEST CENTRAL TEXAS: $478k → 13%COMMUNITIES FOUNDATION OF TEXAS: $1.4M → 14%WEST CENTRAL TEXAS WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT BOARD INC: $392k → 16%KILGORE COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $330k → 16%CITIZENS FOR EDUCATION EXCELLENCE INC: $432k → 17%EDUCATION SERVICE CENTER- REGION 1: $926k → 27%UNION HIGH SCHOOL: $210k → 9%CLINTON HIGH SCHOOL: $193k → 14%OZARKS TECHNICAL COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $1.5M → 15%MISSOURI COLLEGE AND CAREER ATTAINMENT NETWORK: $250k → 17%NATIONAL COLLEGE ADVISING CORPS INC: $534k → 9%AYERS FOUNDATION: $896k → 18%WORKFORCE SOLUTIONS OF WEST CENTRAL TEXAS: $392k → 13%COMMUNITIES FOUNDATION OF TEXAS-EDUCATE TEXAS: $701k → 14%WEST CENTRAL TEXAS WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT BOARD INC: $391k → 16%KILGORE COLLEGE: $184k → 16%CITIZENS FOR EDUCATION EXCELLENCE INC: $398k → 17%EDUCATION SERVICE CENTER REGION 1 OF TEXAS: $534k → 27%UNION HIGH: $171k → 9%OZARKS TECHNICAL COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $1.2M → 15%AYERS FOUNDATION: $811k → 18%WORKFORCE SOLUTIONS OF WEST CENTRAL TEXAS: $277k → 13%COMMUNITIES FOUNDATION OF TEXAS: $701k → 14%WEST CENTRAL TEXAS WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT BOARD INC: $207k → 16%KILGORE COLLEGE: $169k → 16%CITIZENS FOR EDUCATIONAL EXCELLENCE: $513k → 17%OZARKS TECHNICAL COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $1.1M → 15%THE AYERS FOUNDATION: $412k → 18%WORKFORCE SOLUTIONS OF WEST CENTRAL TEXAS: $277k → 13%COMMUNITIES FOUNDATION OF TEXAS-EDUCATE TEXAS: $665k → 14%EDUCATION TO EMPLOYMENT PARTNERS- CENTER FOR EDUCATIONAL EXCELLENCE: $417k → 17%OZARKS TECHNICAL COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $926k → 15%THE AYERS FOUNDATION: $412k → 18%WORKFORCE SOLUTIONS OF WEST CENTRAL TEXAS: $206k → 13%COMMUNITIES FOUNDATION OF TEXAS: $665k → 14%EDUCATION TO EMPLOYMENT PARTNERS: $305k → 17%OZARKS TECHNICAL COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $815k → 15%THE AYERS FOUNDATION: $401k → 18%EDUCATION TO EMPLOYMENT PARTNERS- CENTER FOR EDUCATIONAL EXCELLENCE: $290k → 17%OZARKS TECHNICAL COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $573k → 15%AYERS FOUNDATION: $375k → 18%EDUCATION TO EMPLOYMENT PARTNERS: $230k → 17%OZARKS TECHNICAL COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $573k → 15%THE AYERS FOUNDATION: $338k → 18%OZARKS TECHNICAL COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $440k → 15%OZARKS TECHINCAL COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $247k → 15%OZARKS TECHNICAL COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $247k → 15%OZARKS TECHNICAL COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $181k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ID
CO
MO
MD
TN
NC
DC
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 28% of Rooted Alliance Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

Rooted Alliance Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 3.4% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

69%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$17M · 12 repeat orgs$7.7M to everyone else

12 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
14

Total granted

$17M
$5.9M

Still filing today

50%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 66% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.8M went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationEmploymentPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WC
    West Central Texas Workforce Development Board Inc
    2× · 2020–2024 · $990k · revenue +74% · 61% of their budget
  • CF
    CITIZENS FOR EDUCATIONAL EXCELLENCE INC
    2× · 2020–2021 · $736k · revenue +379% · 47% of their budget
  • MC
    MISSOURI COLLEGE AND CAREER ATTAINMENT NETWORK
    2× · 2023–2024 · $328k · revenue +117%

Funded once

  • CF
    COMMUNITIES FOUNDATION OF TEXAS-EDUCATE TEXAS
    one grant, 2023 · $1.4M
  • ES
    EDUCATION SERVICE CENTER- REGION 1
    one grant, 2023 · $926k
  • AF
    AYERS FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $896k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
2
The Common Application Inc

The common application is a not-for-profit membership organization of over 1,100 colleges and universities across the globe committed to access, equity, and integrity in the college admission process. every year, over 1.5 million students…

Education
3
National Association for College Admission Counseling

Empowering college admission counseling professionals through education, advocacy, and community.

Education
4
National Action Council for Minorities in Engineering Inc

To provide leadership and support for the national effort to increase the representation of successful african american, native american and latinx women and men in engineering and technology, math, and science-based careers.

Civil Rights
5
American Council On Education

Ace leads higher education with a united vision for the future, galvanizing our members to make change. the council collaborates across the sector to design solutions for today's challenges, serves the needs of a diverse student…

Education
6
Arizona Community Foundation

To lead, serve and collaborate to mobilize enduring philanthropy for a better arizona.

Philanthropy
7
National Association of Corporate Directors

We empower directors and transform boards to be future ready.

Public Benefit
8
National Council for Workforce Education

NCWE promotes student success and excellence in education and training by providing the link between policy and practice.

Education
9
Coop Careers Inc

Building a movement of diverse, upwardly mobile college grads overcoming underemployment through digital skills and peer connections.

Education
10
Aacsb International - the Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business

Aacsb international provides quality assurance of business school programs, the latest in business education intelligence, thought leadership, and learning and development services.

Education
11
Center for the Future of Arizona

Bringing arizonans together to create a stronger and brighter future for our state.

Community Improvement
12
AI4ALL

Ai4all's mission is to ensure that the next generation of ai leaders reflects humanity. ai4all is transforming the pipeline of ai practitioners who will shape ai for the benefit of humanity.

Youth Development

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Communities Foundation of Texas Inc and the most unlike its peers is Ayers Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
7/10
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

OZARKS TECHNICAL COMMUNITY COLLEGE — $7,626,194 · OtherOZARKS TECHNICAL COMMUNITY COLLEGEWORKFORCE SOLUTIONS OF WEST CENTRAL TEXAS — $1,629,864 · OtherWORKFORCE SOLUTIONS OF WEST CENTRAL TEXASCOMMUNITIES FOUNDATION OF TEXAS-EDUCATE TEXAS — $1,365,993 · OtherCOMMUNITIES FOUNDATION OF TEXAS-EDUCATE TEXASKILGORE COLLEGE — $1,081,164 · OtherKILGORE COLLEGEEDUCATION SERVICE CENTER- REGION 1 — $926,366 · OtherAYERS FOUNDATION — $896,300 · OtherCITIZENS FOR EDUCATION EXCELLENCE INC — $830,813 · OtherEDUCATION TO EMPLOYMENT PARTNERS- CENTER FOR EDUCATIONAL EXCELLENCE — $707,322 · Other+18 more — $3,675,809 · Other+18 moreCOMMUNITIES FOUNDATION OF TEXAS INC — $2,760,993 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITIES FOUNDATION …Ayers Foundation — $2,749,598 · PhilanthropyAyers FoundationIMPACT CHARITABLE — $223,700 · PhilanthropyCITIZENS FOR EDUCATIONAL EXCELLENCE INC — $735,762 · EducationNATIONAL COLLEGE ADVISING CORPS INC — $682,713 · EducationMISSOURI COLLEGE AND CAREER ATTAINMENT NETWORK — $328,000 · EducationACHIEVING THE DREAM INC — $294,500 · EducationWest Central Texas Workforce Development Board Inc — $989,657 · Employment
Other$18,739,825Philanthropy$5,734,291Education$2,040,975Employment$989,657

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCOMMUNITIES FOUNDATION OF TEXAS INC — $2,760,993 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetAyers Foundation — $2,749,598 over 3y, 77% of budgetWest Central Texas Workforce Development Board Inc — $989,657 over 2y, 61% of budgetCITIZENS FOR EDUCATIONAL EXCELLENCE INC — $735,762 over 2y, 47% of budgetNATIONAL COLLEGE ADVISING CORPS INC — $682,713 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetMISSOURI COLLEGE AND CAREER ATTAINMENT NETWORK — $328,000 over 2y, 21% of budgetACHIEVING THE DREAM INC — $294,500 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetIMPACT CHARITABLE — $223,700 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetNATIONAL GOVERNORS ASSOCIATION CENTER FOR BEST PRACTICES — $100,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetMISSOURI CHAMBER FOUNDATION — $77,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds COMMUNITIES FOUNDATION OF TEXAS INC
  • Who funds Ayers Foundation
  • Who funds West Central Texas Workforce Development Board Inc
  • Who funds CITIZENS FOR EDUCATIONAL EXCELLENCE INC
  • Who funds NATIONAL COLLEGE ADVISING CORPS INC
  • Who funds MISSOURI COLLEGE AND CAREER ATTAINMENT NETWORK
  • Who funds ACHIEVING THE DREAM INC
  • Who funds IMPACT CHARITABLE
  • Who funds NATIONAL GOVERNORS ASSOCIATION CENTER FOR BEST PRACTICES
  • Who funds MISSOURI CHAMBER FOUNDATION

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Lumina Foundation for Education IncIN15.5× affinity5 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Lumina Foundation for Education Inc · Gates Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Rooted Alliance Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Achieving the Dream Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Rooted Alliance Inc?

Find your warmest path to Rooted Alliance Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph