Skip to content

· Private foundation

Rondall I Woodall Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$6k
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$1k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Recreation & Sports$76kEducation$54kYouth Development$17kHuman Services$3kEnvironment$2kHealth$1kReligion$1kFood & Nutrition$688Other$0
02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$300
Median grant
2
States reached
$342k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$1,000
Four Diamonds$650
Lake Idlewild Lake Association$600
Central Dauphin High School$500
Mecca Sports Inc$500
Pittsburgh Wrestling Club$500
Wildcat Foundation$360
Individual grant recipient$300
D3 Training Center$250
Nittany Lion Wrestling Club$250
West Hanover Elementary School$225
Central Dauphin High School$150
Mid Valley High School$150
Boy Scouts$150
Central Dauphin High School$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–23, $625) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 28% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%SWEET GRACE MINISTRIES: $250 → 9%Sweet Grace Ministries: $100 → 9%SWEET GRACE MINISTRIES: $100 → 9%YMCA: $175 → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

67%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$105k · 21 repeat orgs$51k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +60% since the first grant, against +34% for those funded once.

21 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
59

Total granted

$105k
$49k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+60%
+34%

Still filing today

29%
8%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 54% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationRecreation & SportsHealthHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TW
    THE WILDCAT FOUNDATION
    3× · 2023–2025 · $1k · revenue +64%
  • PT
    PAINT THE PLANET PINK
    2× · 2017–2024 · $600 · revenue +60%
  • SG
    SWEET GRACE MINISTRIES
    3× · 2019–2023 · $450 · revenue +90%

Funded once

  • CB
    COLIN BRIGHT PRO WRESTLING EMPIRE
    one grant, 2017 · $11k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $4k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
National Wrestling Coaches Association

The nwca brings the wrestling coaching community together to advance the sport and ensure that current and future generations have the opportunity to engage in a safe and educationally based wrestling experience. this is primarily done by…

Recreation & Sports
2
Massachusetts Wrestling Association Inc

Our mission is to promote and improve the level of competition in wrestling for ma by running first class state wrestling tournament series, providing an open line of communication and promote new programs and interest

Recreation & Sports
3
California Regional Training Center

The california regional training center also known as the cardinal wrestling club builds champions in wrestling and in life, expands access to the sport, and improves the communities it serves.

Recreation & Sports
4
Nashville Catholic Youth Wrestling

Nashville catholic youth wrestlings mission is to teach and promote amateur wrestling as a sport based on skill, determination, hard work and self-displine.

Youth Development
5
Usa Weightlifting Inc

The mission of usa weightlifting shall be to support united states athletes in achieving excellence in olympic and world competition and to support, promote, and educate a diverse and inclusive community of weightlifting and the use of the…

—
6
Great Neck Wrestling Association

To teach the sport of wrestling to youths under the age of 18, and to promote interest in the sport of wrestling among the parents and youth of the great neck area of virginia beach, va and surrounding localities.

Youth Development
7
Eastern Intercollegiate Wrestling Association

The eastern intercollegiate wrestling association's purposes are: (i) to coordinate the efforts of accredited member institutions of higher education which minimally offer a bachelor's degree and share a commitment to promote the sport of…

Recreation & Sports
8
Miles City Wrestling Club Inc

To foster and improve amateur wrestling in the city of miles city, in accordance with the standards and rules of the montana state and national amateur athletic union; to promote sportsmanship and character of participating athletes; to…

Recreation & Sports
9
Glasgow Wrestling Club

Glasgow wrestling club (gwc) is working to advance the sport of wrestling. gwc seeks to increase the recruitment and retention of youth wrestlers by improving the efficiency, effectiveness and enjoyment of all aspects of youth wrestling.

Recreation & Sports
10
Cleveland Youth Wildcat Wrestling Club
Recreation & Sports
11
Wisconsin Regional Training Center Inc

The wrtc is a usa wrestling sanctioned freestyle and greco training center where high school, college, and post-collegiate wrestlers who meet established criteria can all train together on a consistent basis to reach their goals of being…

Recreation & Sports
12
Dcac Inc

The dcac fosters and promotes the sport of amateur wrestling at all age levels in the domestic & international styles of wrestling through clinics (one day teaching seminars), camps (multiple date teaching and competition gatherings) and…

Recreation & Sports
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Reaches; the most unlike its peers is American Heart Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 87 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
7/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Central Dauphin East High School: $34,306 · OtherCentral Dauphin East High SchoolSTEELTON - HIGHSPIRE SCH DIST: $22,500 · OtherSTEELTON - HIGHSPIRE SCH DISTPittston Area School District: $21,887 · OtherPittston Area School DistrictCOLIN BRIGHT PRO WRESTLING EMPIRE: $11,000 · OtherCOLIN BRIGHT PRO WRESTLING EMPIREIndividual grant recipient: $5,000 · Other+72 more: $53,605 · Other+72 moreD3 TRAINING CENTER: $3,500 · Recreation & SportsREACHES: $980 · Recreation & SportsTHE WILDCAT FOUNDATION: $1,210 · EducationMECCA SPORTS INC: $750 · EducationFOUNDATION FOR THE CENTRAL DAUPHIN SCHOOLS: $100 · EducationPAINT THE PLANET PINK: $600 · HealthAmerican Heart Association Inc: $50 · HealthSWEET GRACE MINISTRIES: $450 · Human ServicesYMCA OF THE ROSES: $175 · Human ServicesCAPITAL AREA SOCCER ASSOCIATION: $75 · Youth Development
Other$148,298Recreation & Sports$4,480Education$2,060Health$650Human Services$625Youth Development$75

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetD3 TRAINING CENTER: $3,500 over 3y, 4.3% of budgetTHE WILDCAT FOUNDATION: $1,210 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetREACHES: $980 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetNITTANY LION WRESTLING CLUB: $850 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMECCA SPORTS INC: $750 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetPAINT THE PLANET PINK: $600 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetSWEET GRACE MINISTRIES: $450 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetYMCA OF THE ROSES: $175 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR THE CENTRAL DAUPHIN SCHOOLS: $100 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCAPITAL AREA SOCCER ASSOCIATION: $75 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds D3 TRAINING CENTER ↗
  • Who funds THE WILDCAT FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds REACHES ↗
  • Who funds NITTANY LION WRESTLING CLUB ↗
  • Who funds MECCA SPORTS INC ↗
  • Who funds PAINT THE PLANET PINK ↗
  • Who funds SWEET GRACE MINISTRIES ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA1.5× affinity5 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Rondall I Woodall Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Rondall I Woodall Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Rondall I Woodall Charitable Trust?

    Find your warmest path to Rondall I Woodall Charitable Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 87 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Rondall I Woodall’s filings →

    More from the funding graph