· Private foundation
Rondall I Woodall Charitable Trust
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Individual grant recipient | $1,000 |
| Four Diamonds | $650 |
| Lake Idlewild Lake Association | $600 |
| Mecca Sports Inc | $500 |
| Central Dauphin High School | $500 |
| Pittsburgh Wrestling Club | $500 |
| Wildcat Foundation | $360 |
| Individual grant recipient | $300 |
| Nittany Lion Wrestling Club | $250 |
| D3 Training Center | $250 |
| West Hanover Elementary School | $225 |
| Central Dauphin High School | $150 |
| Boy Scouts | $150 |
| Mid Valley High School | $150 |
| Central Dauphin High School | $100 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–23, $625) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 28% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +60% since the first grant, against +34% for the ones you funded once.
21 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 54% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TWTHE WILDCAT FOUNDATION3× · 2023–2025 · $1k · revenue +64%
- PTPAINT THE PLANET PINK2× · 2017–2024 · $600 · revenue +60%
- SGSWEET GRACE MINISTRIES3× · 2019–2023 · $450 · revenue +90%
Funded once
- CBCOLIN BRIGHT PRO WRESTLING EMPIREone grant, 2017 · $11k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2021 · $5k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2018 · $4k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The nwca brings the wrestling coaching community together to advance the sport and ensure that current and future generations have the opportunity to engage in a safe and educationally based wrestling experience. this is primarily done by…
Our mission is to promote and improve the level of competition in wrestling for ma by running first class state wrestling tournament series, providing an open line of communication and promote new programs and interest
The california regional training center also known as the cardinal wrestling club builds champions in wrestling and in life, expands access to the sport, and improves the communities it serves.
Nashville catholic youth wrestlings mission is to teach and promote amateur wrestling as a sport based on skill, determination, hard work and self-displine.
The mission of usa weightlifting shall be to support united states athletes in achieving excellence in olympic and world competition and to support, promote, and educate a diverse and inclusive community of weightlifting and the use of the…
To teach the sport of wrestling to youths under the age of 18, and to promote interest in the sport of wrestling among the parents and youth of the great neck area of virginia beach, va and surrounding localities.
The eastern intercollegiate wrestling association's purposes are: (i) to coordinate the efforts of accredited member institutions of higher education which minimally offer a bachelor's degree and share a commitment to promote the sport of…
To foster and improve amateur wrestling in the city of miles city, in accordance with the standards and rules of the montana state and national amateur athletic union; to promote sportsmanship and character of participating athletes; to…
Glasgow wrestling club (gwc) is working to advance the sport of wrestling. gwc seeks to increase the recruitment and retention of youth wrestlers by improving the efficiency, effectiveness and enjoyment of all aspects of youth wrestling.
The wrtc is a usa wrestling sanctioned freestyle and greco training center where high school, college, and post-collegiate wrestlers who meet established criteria can all train together on a consistent basis to reach their goals of being…
The dcac fosters and promotes the sport of amateur wrestling at all age levels in the domestic & international styles of wrestling through clinics (one day teaching seminars), camps (multiple date teaching and competition gatherings) and…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Reaches and the most unlike its peers is American Heart Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 87 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.
Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Rondall I Woodall Charitable Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Rondall I Woodall Charitable Trust?
Find your warmest path to Rondall I Woodall Charitable Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.