Loading…
· Private foundation
Rondall I Woodall Charitable Trust
This foundation does not accept unsolicited requests — it funds preselected organizations.
$17k
Granted FY2024
20
Grants
1
Communities
$9k
Largest
01What you fund
01
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 80% of Rondall I Woodall Charitable Trust’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.
02beneath the categories
Past the labels — and the year it shifted
Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.
…and in their own words, year by year
2018
little leagueoffset teamcountry boosteroffset runningteam apparelparticipatingoffset uniforms
2019
dauphin districtchessbooster donationswrestling camptraveloffsetstudents
2020
fees uniforms
2021
gear pittstongear eastgear tournamenttournament studentsstudents easteast crosscountry team
2022
studentsscout troopcamp geargear dauphinchildrenlearning materialsdistrict
2023
camp geargear dauphinlearningmaterialschildren
2024
nepayouthcollegiate athleteslearningtournamentwrestlingwrestlers
Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.
03FY2024 · 20 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
$350
Median grant
1
States reached
$329k
Total assets
Largest grants
- Central Dauphin East High School$8,615
- D3 Training Center$2,750
- Pittsburgh Wrestling Club$1,000
- Meals on Wheels$688
- Nittany Lion Wrestling Club$600
- CD 4 Diamonds$500
- Central Dauphin East High School$500
- Paint Pittston Pink$500
- Lake Idlewild Lake Association$350
- Wildcat Foundation$350
- Central Dauphin East High School$300
- Hansel and Gretel Early Learning Ce$250
- Mecca Sports Inc$250
- Stingers Wrestling Club$200
- Rescue Warriors Cat Rescue$100
02The need
04
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Your human-services grants (FY17–23, $625) land where the poverty rate runs at 10% — the area typically sits at 11%. 28% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your edge
repeat funding
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
66%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$96k · 19 repeat orgs$50k to everyone else
19 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Re-uppedFunded once
Organizations
19
53
Total granted
$96k
$47k
Median revenue growth · since first grant
-16%
+117%
Still filing today
26%
6%
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.
RenewedFirst-time
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
EducationRecreation & SportsHuman ServicesHealthYouth DevelopmentOther
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CDCentral Dauphin East High School7× · 2018–2024 · $30k
- SHSTEELTON - HIGHSPIRE SCH DIST5× · 2017–2021 · $23k
- PAPittston Area School District4× · 2018–2023 · $22k · revenue -80%
Funded once
- CBCOLIN BRIGHT PRO WRESTLING EMPIREone grant, 2017 · $11k
- WCWORLD CLASS WRESTLINGone grant, 2021 · $5k
- PWPRO WRESTLING EMPIREone grant, 2018 · $4k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
04Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
Massachusetts Wrestling Association
Our mission is to promote and improve the level of competition in wrestling for massachusetts by running first class state wrestling tournament series, providing an open line of communications between member teams, and promoting new…
Recreation & Sports
2
National Wrestling Coaches
The primary purpose of the national wrestling coaches association is to serve, promote, and protect the sport of amateur wrestling primarily in the educational environment (middle school, high school, and college).
Recreation & Sports
3
Penn Wrestling Club Inc
Grades k-12 wrestling club
—
4
Erie Tigers Wrestling Club
Recreation & Sports
5
Woodbury Athletic Association
To promote the athletic and social development of the youth of the city of woodbury, mn, through organized sports as a means of healthful recreation and physical fitness, and to maintain high standards, fair play, and good sportsmanship.
—
6
Shrewsbury Youth Athletic Assoc
Education
7
Pennsylvania Rtc
The PRTC operates for the purpose of promoting the advancement of amateur wrestling, including education, development, and training.
Recreation & Sports
8
Farmington Wrestling Club
To promote interest in the sport of wrestling among parents and the youth of farmington.
Recreation & Sports
9
Sedro Woolley Steelclaw Wrestling Club
Sedro woolley steelclaw wrestling club provides a safe enviornment for the youth of sedro woolley to channel their energies into a safe and supervised sport. local boys and girls are trained by qualified coaches to partake in wrestling as…
Youth Development
10
Johnstown Youth Athletic
To provide viable and competitive recreation sports programs to community children.
Recreation & Sports
11
Montgomery Youth Wrestling
Teaching youth the sport of wrestling in an encouraging and competitive environment, arranging, organizing and hosting competitive youth wrestling matches, tournaments and clinics while encouraging youth to participate in such wrestling…
Recreation & Sports
12
Great Neck Wrestling Association
To teach the sport of wrestling to youths under the age of 18, and to promote interest in the sport of wrestling among the parents and youth of the great neck area of virginia beach, va and surrounding localities.
Youth Development
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Reaches and the most unlike its peers is Pittston Area School District. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network
11 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
6/11
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Other$117,181Education$23,037Recreation & Sports$4,230Human Services$625Health$600Youth Development$75
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.
Amazonsmile FoundationWA1.6× affinity6 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation Rondall I Woodall Charitable Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
05Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: Pittston Area School District.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
high risk
~2 months of operating runway; revenue contracted over 7 filed years.
Track record & reputation
low risk
7 years of Form 990 filings, still active.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 161734997 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on Pittston Area School District, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- FlagFinancial stability— Roughly 2 months of cash on hand.
- WatchSustained operations— Filing through 2025; revenue contracted over the period.
- On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 9% of their budget — diversified.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to Rondall I Woodall Charitable Trust?
Find your warmest path to Rondall I Woodall Charitable Trust through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines