Skip to content

· Private foundation

Ron and Chris Harris Charitable Foundation Trust

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$19k
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Human Services$51kHealth$24kPhilanthropy$5kYouth Development$4kEducation$3kArts & Culture$2kPublic Benefit$300
02FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k7 grants · $9k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$1,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$236k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CEDARS HOME FOR CHILDREN FOUNDATION$10,000
BRYAN HEALTH FOUNDATION$5,000
JOSH COLLINGSWORTH FOUNDATION$1,000
MOURNING HOPE$1,000
CORNHUSKER COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS$500
Individual grant recipient$500
LINCOLN LITERACY$300
WHITE CANE FOUNDATION$300
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $45k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%CEDARS HOME FOR CHILDREN FOUNDATION: $10k → 13%CEDARS HOME FOR CHILDREN FOUNDATION: $10k → 13%CEDARS HOME FOR CHILDREN FOUNDATION: $10k → 13%CEDARS HOME FOR CHILDREN FOUNDATION: $10k → 13%CEDARS HOME FOR CHILDREN FOUNDATION: $5k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$84k · 11 repeat orgs$5k to everyone else

11 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
5

Total granted

$84k
$4k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+30%
+79%

Still filing today

73%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesArts & CulturePhilanthropyHealthYouth DevelopmentEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TC
    THE CEDARS HOME FOR CHILDREN FOUNDATION
    5× · 2020–2024 · $45k · revenue +30%
  • LL
    LINCOLN LITERACY COUNCIL
    3× · 2021–2024 · $1k · revenue +216%
  • MT
    MATT TALBOT KITCHEN & OUTREACH
    2× · 2020–2021 · $1k · revenue +76%

Funded once

  • LC
    LUX CENTER FOR THE ARTSgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $2k · revenue +79%
  • UF
    UNL FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2020 · $1k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $500
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lincoln University Aka Lincoln College

Lincoln college uniquely empowers students to realize their full potential

Education
2
Lincoln Central Neighborhood Family Center

To provide programs for the residents in the lincoln/central school area.

Community Improvement
3
Lincoln Children's Museum

The lincoln children's museum invites children to create, discover and learn through the power of play.

Arts & Culture
4
Lincoln Foundation

To provide educational enrichment programs that develop and support youth in overcoming social and economic barriers to achievement. this mission is accomplished through college access and college success programs.

Education
5
Educare of Lincoln Inc

To help young children thrive socially, emotionally and academically through high-quality early childhood education, and in partnership with their families and the community.

Education
6
Lincoln University

To provide traditional educational programs in diverse fields of study, delivered by experienced educators, and leading to outstanding employment opportunities for American and international students

—
7
Malone Community Center

To eliminate multigenerational poverty in lincoln by creating unity and prosperity throughout lincoln while honoring our african-american heritage.

—
8
Food Bank of Lincoln Foundation

The foundation is dedicated to the development and implementation of the food bank, an organization exempt under code section 501(c)(3).

Food & Nutrition
9
Lincoln Health Foundation
Health
10
Lincoln University Foundation of Pa

See schedule othe lincoln university foundation of pennsylvania is a separately incorporated 501(c)(3) organized for the purpose of serving as a supporting organization and foundation to lincoln university of the commonwealth system of…

Education
11
Lincoln Christian School Foundation Short Tax Year Ended 5/31/2025

To provide supplementary support of lincoln christian school's programs and facilites.

Education
12
Food Bank of Lincoln Inc

The food bank of lincoln, inc. is a nonprofit corporation organized to meet the emergency food needs for the sixteen counties it serves in southeast nebraska.the food bank of lincoln serves as a key organization for receiving, inspecting,…

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Junior Achievement of Lincoln Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Madonna Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
5/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE CEDARS HOME FOR CHILDREN FOUNDATION: $45,000 · Human ServicesTHE CEDARS HOME FOR CHILDREN FOUNDATION+1 more: $1,000 · Human ServicesBryan Foundation: $20,000 · HealthBryan FoundationCORNHUSKER COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS: $2,500 · OtherCORNHUSKER …JOSHUA COLLINGSWORTH FOUNDATION: $1,750 · OtherJOSHUA COLL…Individual grant recipient: $1,500 · OtherIndividual …UNL FOUNDATION: $1,000 · OtherUNL FOUNDAT…JOSH COLLINGSWORTH FOUNDATION: $1,000 · OtherJOSH COLLIN…Individual grant recipient: $500 · OtherIndividual …UNIVERSITY OF NE FDN - SIGS OF THE 60'S: $500 · OtherUNIVERSITY …+1 more: $300 · OtherMOURNING HOPE: $4,500 · Arts & CultureLUX CENTER FOR THE ARTS: $2,000 · Arts & CultureTHE MADONNA FOUNDATION: $4,000 · PhilanthropyFITTING FUTURES: $700 · PhilanthropyJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF LINCOLN INC: $1,500 · Youth DevelopmentLINCOLN LITERACY COUNCIL: $1,300 · Education
Human Services$46,000Health$20,000Other$9,050Arts & Culture$6,500Philanthropy$4,700Youth Development$1,500Education$1,300

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE CEDARS HOME FOR CHILDREN FOUNDATION: $45,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetBryan Foundation: $20,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetMOURNING HOPE: $4,500 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetTHE MADONNA FOUNDATION: $4,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetLUX CENTER FOR THE ARTS: $2,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF LINCOLN INC: $1,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetLINCOLN LITERACY COUNCIL: $1,300 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMATT TALBOT KITCHEN & OUTREACH: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFITTING FUTURES: $700 over 3y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE CEDARS HOME FOR CHILDREN FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Bryan Foundation ↗
  • Who funds MOURNING HOPE ↗
  • Who funds THE MADONNA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LUX CENTER FOR THE ARTS ↗
  • Who funds JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF LINCOLN INC ↗
  • Who funds LINCOLN LITERACY COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds MATT TALBOT KITCHEN & OUTREACH ↗
  • Who funds FITTING FUTURES ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Lee and Debbie Stuart Family FoundationNE22.1× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Lee and Debbie Stuart Family Foundation · Assurity Life Foundation · Lincoln Community Foundation Inc · Kinder Porter Scott Family Foundation · Rogers Foundation · The Sunderland Foundation · Acklie Charitable Foundation · Duncan Family Trust · United Way of Lincoln and Lancaster County · Abel Foundation · Cooper Foundation · Bnsf Railway Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ron and Chris Harris Charitable Foundation Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ron and Chris Harris Charitable Foundation Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Ron and Chris Harris Charitable Foundation Trust?

    Find your warmest path to Ron and Chris Harris Charitable Foundation Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Ron and Chris Harris’ filings →

    More from the funding graph