Skip to content
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants: funding profile →

Idaho · Public charity

Rolling Tomato

We recover excess foods destined for the landfill, and distribute them to our partner recipient organizations for the people they serve.

$921k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
Read the full brief
Total assets, FY2025
$102k

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

St Luke's Health Syst…Idaho Foodbank Wareho…Idaho Housing Foundat…Idaho Community Found…The Albertsons Compan…American Online Givin…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
St Luke's Health System LtdID15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: St Luke's Health System Ltd · Idaho Foodbank Warehouse · Idaho Housing Foundation · Idaho Community Foundation Inc · The Albertsons Companies Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Rolling Tomato with peer funders

About Rolling Tomato

How much does Rolling Tomato give?
Rolling Tomato reported $920,786 in grants in its FY2025 IRS filing. Individual grant detail isn't itemized in the e-filed return we have. It is referenced on an attached schedule, or the latest filing isn't in our corpus yet.
Which funders back the same organizations as Rolling Tomato?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include St Luke's Health System Ltd, Idaho Foodbank Warehouse, Idaho Housing Foundation.
Where is Rolling Tomato based?
Rolling Tomato is based in ID.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home