Skip to content
Rogers Family Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Rogers Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$461k
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$426k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Philanthropy$2.8MHealth$315kEducation$125kInternational$90kReligion$21kHuman Services$20kFood & Nutrition$15kYouth Development$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $35k
  • $250k+1 grant · $426k
$20,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$408k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MORGAN STANLEY GLOBAL IMPACT FUNDING TRUST INC$426,062
FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$20,000
FEEDING SOUTH FLORIDA$15,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–21, $250) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%HOSPICE OF TIFT AREA: $250 → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.2M · 6 repeat orgs$166k to everyone else

6 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
8

Total granted

$3.2M
$131k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
+39%

Still filing today

50%
63%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $35k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
PhilanthropyInternationalHealthHuman ServicesFood & NutritionCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RG
    Ranger Good Works Inc
    2× · 2021–2024 · $125k · revenue ×18 · 39% of their budget
  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    2× · 2020–2022 · $50k · revenue +39%
  • SF
    SOUTH FLORIDA PUBLIC MEDIA GROUP INC
    2× · 2020–2021 · $4k · revenue +27%

Funded once

  • TC
    THE CARTER CENTER INC
    one grant, 2020 · $40k · revenue +25%
  • BR
    BROWARD REGIONAL HEALTH PLANNING COUNCILgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $30k · revenue +129%
  • SC
    SECOND CHANCE SOCIETY INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $30k · revenue +39%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Jessie Trice Community Health System Inc

The mission of jessie trice community health system, inc. (the orgainzation) is to improve health equality for our diverse south florida community by providing and increasing access to quality comprehensive primary care services. please…

Health
2
Healthy Mothers-Health Babies Coalition of Broward County Inc

Healthy mothers-healthy babies is dedicated to reducing infant deaths by providing resources and education to pregnant women, parents, and their families. the organization serves all families of broward county but focuses primarily on…

Health
3
South Miami Childrens Clinic Inc

Pediatric medical clinic for uninsured and underinsured children

Health
4
Dade County Street Response Inc

Dcsr serves those most affected by poverty and opression in miami dade county. throughout the year, our srteet medicine team offer medical outreach and case management. our community programs develop education and advocacy events regarding…

Health
5
Health Education Prevention and Promotion Inc

To empower the south florida minority communities to develop healthy habits for greater health through awareness, education, guidance and counseling.

Health
6
Baptist Health Medical Group Inc

As part of the baptist health network, the mission of baptist health medical group inc is to improve the health and well-being of individuals, and to promote the sanctity and preservation of life, in the communities we serve. baptist…

Health
7
University of Miami
—
8
Broward House Inc

Mission the mission of broward house is to improve the quality of life for individuals impacted with chronic health challenges, including hiv, by providing pathways to wellness. vision providing hope and healing to our communities,

Human Services
9
Miami Cancer Institute At Baptist Health Inc

As part of the baptist health network, the mission of miami cancer institute at baptist health, inc is to improve the health and well-being of individuals, and to promote the sanctity and preservation of life, in the communities we serve.…

Health
10
Doctors Hospital Inc

As part of the baptist health network, the mission of doctors hospital, inc. is to improve the health and well-being of individuals, and to promote the sanctity and preservation of life, in the communities we serve. baptist health is a…

Health
11
South Miami Hospital Inc

As part of the baptist health network, the mission of south miami hospital is to improve the health and well-being of individuals, and to promote the sanctity and preservation of life, in the communities we serve. baptist health is a…

Health
12
Premier Mobile Health Services Corporation

Premier mobile health services mission is to provide access to quality healthcare services to the medically vulnerable and those who are most at risk of developing and experiencing long-term illnesses and hospitalization.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Feeding South Florida Inc; the most unlike its peers is Hospice of Tift Area Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MORGAN STANLEY GLOBAL IMPACT FUNDING TRUST INC: $2,730,322 · OtherMORGAN STANLEY GLOBAL IMPACT FUNDING TRUST INCALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION SOUTHEAST FLORIDA CHAPTER: $210,000 · OtherALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION SOUTHEAST FLORIDA CHAPTER+5 more: $115,500 · OtherRanger Good Works Inc: $125,000 · PhilanthropySECOND CHANCE SOCIETY INC: $30,000 · PhilanthropyMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $50,000 · InternationalTHE CARTER CENTER INC: $40,000 · InternationalBROWARD REGIONAL HEALTH PLANNING COUNCIL: $30,000 · HealthSOUTH FLORIDA PUBLIC MEDIA GROUP INC: $3,500 · HealthFEEDING SOUTH FLORIDA INC: $15,000 · Food & NutritionBOO2BULLYING INC: $10,000 · Crime & LegalHOSPICE OF TIFT AREA INC: $250 · Human Services
Other$3,055,822Philanthropy$155,000International$90,000Health$33,500Food & Nutrition$15,000Crime & Legal$10,000Human Services$250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetRanger Good Works Inc: $125,000 over 2y, 39% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $50,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CARTER CENTER INC: $40,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBROWARD REGIONAL HEALTH PLANNING COUNCIL: $30,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFEEDING SOUTH FLORIDA INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBOO2BULLYING INC: $10,000 over 1y, 18% of budgetSOUTH FLORIDA PUBLIC MEDIA GROUP INC: $3,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHOSPICE OF TIFT AREA INC: $250 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Morgan Stanley Global…
Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust IncIN10.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Rogers Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Rogers Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 5%
  • Feeding South Florida Inc: 5% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Rogers Family Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Rogers Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Rogers Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home