· Private foundation
Rockwell C Webb Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k4 grants · $23k
- $10k–50k5 grants · $98k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $52k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| PRESCOTT WESTERN HERITAGE FOUNDATIO | $52,000 |
| POLICE OFFICERS SCOTTSDALE ASSOC | $26,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $22,500 |
| PRESCOTT FIREFIGHTER CHARITIES | $20,000 |
| ASCEND SCHOOL AUTISM SPECTRUM CTR | $19,000 |
| LIBERTY BAPTIST CHURCH | $10,000 |
| YAVAPAI HUMANE SOCIETY | $9,000 |
| UNITED ANIMAL FRIENDS | $6,500 |
| KID'S BEAT CANCER FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| MISS KITY'S CAT HOUSE | $2,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 99% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +52% since the first grant, against +16% for the ones you funded once.
17 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- PWPrescott Western Heritage Foundation Inc9× · 2017–2025 · $94k · revenue +125%
- YHYAVAPAI HUMANE SOCIETY9× · 2017–2025 · $51k · revenue +52%
- PFPRESCOTT FIREFIGHTERS CHARITIES INC3× · 2023–2025 · $45k · revenue +103%
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2024 · $7k
- LMLAKE MARY HS DRAMA BOOSTERSone grant, 2022 · $7k
- SRSOLID ROCK TEEN CENTERSone grant, 2022 · $7k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Animal search and rescue, vetting, rehome and placement of unwanted and abandoned pets, primarily in northern arizona.sponsors a foster pet program and overpopulation program of spay and neuter.
Prevention of animal cruelty and intervention on behalf of animals being abused.
PACC911 (Phoenix Animal Care Coalition) unites and supports pet rescue organizations throughout Arizona by fostering collaboration and providing critical resources that strengthen lifesaving efforts. Through large well promoted adoption…
Take dogs from local shelters, rehabilitate them medically if necessary, care for and get the pet ready for adoption into a family. Hold adoption events, adoption screenings, and transportation if needed.
To advocate on behalf of reptiles through Rescue, Relocation, Rehabilitation and Education
On average, we find homes for over 100 cats each year through our adoption program. In 2024 we fixed 125 cats with our TNR efforts and were able to provide a dozen microchips to owned pets in the community
No-kill, cage free cat sanctuary with adoption
Central Arizona Animal Rescue serves the community by rescuing, caring for, rehabilitating and placing rescued animals with new owners that would otherwise be euthanized. We spay or neuter all animals that are adopted, ending the cycle of…
Search and Rescue in Yavapai County, AZ
Lovepup foundation is an arizona non-profit corporation organized and operated exclusively for the charitable purpose of facilitating the rescue, rehabilitation, and adoption of dogs and other pets.
We are dedicated to building a community responsible for pet stewardship and humane treatment of animals.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Yavapai Humane Society and the most unlike its peers is Christian Academy of Prescott Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Prescott Western Heritage Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds YAVAPAI HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds PRESCOTT FIREFIGHTERS CHARITIES INC ↗
- Who funds Prescott Animal Park Association ↗
- Who funds Yavapai Exceptional Industries ↗
- Who funds Prescott Police Foundation ↗
- Who funds THE MUSEUM OF INDIGENOUS PEOPLE ↗
- Who funds UNITED ANIMAL FRIENDS INC ↗
- Who funds JUDICIAL WATCH INC ↗
- Who funds NRA FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds MISS KITTYS CAT HOUSE ↗
- Who funds Christian Academy of Prescott Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Arizona Community Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Rockwell C Webb Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.