Loading…
· Public charity
ROCKVILLE CENTRE ST PATRICK'S PARADE
The rockville centre st.
$216k
Granted FY2024
2
Grants
1
Communities
$72k
Largest
01What you fund
0181% classified
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2018–2024.
Health$211kHuman Services$196kArts & Culture$41kOther$105k
02beneath the categories
Past the labels — and the year it shifted
Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.
…and in their own words, year by year
2019
education
2022
armyway
2023
—
2024
—
2025
hazinganothernmbfcancer
Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.
03FY2024 · 2 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
$72,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$60k
Total assets
Largest grants
- LIMB KIND FOUNDATION INC$72,000
- BEYOND THE BADGE INC$72,000
02The need
04
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Your human-services grants (FY18–23, $196k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7% — the area typically sits at 8%. 31% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
Trb Memorial Foundation
Serving those affected by the suicide of a loved one.
Human Services
2
The 15 for Life Foundation Inc
The Foundations mission is to better equip people of all ages to understand and recognize depression and mental illness and to shed the shame and embarrassment around depression and mental illness.
Philanthropy
3
No Fallen Heroes Foundation Inc
Provide awareness of and support for mental health issues faced by combat veterans
Public Benefit
4
Ryan's Reason Inc
Health
5
Michael Lynch Memorial Foundation Inc
To provide educational assistance to children of firefighters, both fallen and active, as well as other victims of the september 11th tragedies.
Education
6
Blue Line Wives
We provide training counseling and support to the families of local law enforcement as well as provide family support for fallen officers
—
7
On With Life Foundation
Supporting on with life's network of brain rehabilitation programs helping persons served get on with their lives.
Human Services
8
Team Lafontaine Ucancervive
To provide vital funding for cancer research to create a cancer free world.
Health
9
The Kathryn O'connor Foundation
—
10
Out On a Limb Foundation Inc
—
11
Brady Oberg Legacy Foundation
Informing the public about the signs and effects of ptsd while providing soldier retreats and providing scholarships to veterans wishing to go into mental health field.
Health
12
The Jennifer Riordan Foundation
Philanthropy
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Life's Worc Inc and the most unlike its peers is Rockville Centre Breast Cancer Coalition Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network
11 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/11
Grantees still filing
7/11
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Health$211,000Human Services$195,500Other$104,500Arts & Culture$40,500
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds LIMB KIND FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds BEYOND THE BADGE INC ↗
- Who funds HELP INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds RYAN PATRICK O'SHEA FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds FAMILY LIVES FOUND MEMORY M SMILE ↗
- Who funds LIFE'S WORC CENTER FOR AUTISM ↗
- Who funds IRSH AMERICAN HERITAGE MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds ROCKVILLE CENTRE BREAST CANCER COALITION ↗
- Who funds ARMY RANGER LEAD THE WAY FUND ↗
- Who funds HEARTEST YARD FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds OPENDING WORD PROGRAM INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
The Bank of America Charitable Foundation IncNC8.7× affinity6 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Network for Good · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation ROCKVILLE CENTRE ST PATRICK'S PARADE funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–24
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
04Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: IRSH AMERICAN HERITAGE MUSEUM.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
low risk
~21 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 7 filed years.
Track record & reputation
low risk
7 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 2.1× since.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 222880959 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on IRSH AMERICAN HERITAGE MUSEUM, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 21 months of cash on hand.
- On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
- On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 36% of their budget — diversified.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to Rockville Centre St Patrick's Parade?
Find your warmest path to Rockville Centre St Patrick's Parade through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines