Skip to content
Rochelly Foundation The at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Private foundation

Rochelly Foundation The

ASSISTANCE TO THE NEEDY AND TO SUPPORT JEWISH EDUCATION Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$54k
Granted FY2024still arriving
14
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$14k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Religion$455kHealth$34kEducation$26kHuman Services$5kPhilanthropy$3kFood & Nutrition$2kYouth Development$2k
02FY2024 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k11 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $34k
$1,800
Median grant
2
States reached
$21k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MISCELLANEOUS$14,166
HEBREW ACADEMY OF LONG BEACH$10,000
YESHIVA PEER HATORAH INC$10,000
CONG ZICHRON MEIR MOSHE$4,800
KHAL BNEI AVROHOM YAAKOV$4,155
SYNAGOGUE OF CARRIAGE CLUB SOUTH$2,750
THE JEWISH CENTER FOR SPECIAL$1,800
Individual grant recipient$1,800
KHAL ADAS YERUIM OF HILLCREST INC$1,300
KHAL GARDEN VIEW ESTATES INC$950
AGUDATH ISRAEL BAIS BINYOMIN$800
JEP OF LONG ISLAND$606
BAIS ELUZER FUND$300
CONGREGATION ANSHEI WOODLAKE$300
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–24, $19k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 94% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%BAIS ELUZER FUND: $3k → 14%BAIS ELUZER FUND: $300 → 14%DAVIS MEMORIAL FUND INC: $1k → 6%A TORAH INFERTILITY MEDIUM OF: $14k → 20%A TORAH INFERTILITY MEDIUM OF: $360 → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

71%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$374k · 18 repeat orgs$151k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +94% since the first grant, against +1% for those funded once.

18 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
24

Total granted

$374k
$133k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+94%
+1%

Still filing today

11%
46%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 66% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $18k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesPhilanthropyEducationReligionFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • YK
    YESHIVA KETANA OF LONG ISLAND
    3× · 2020–2023 · $104k
  • TA
    TORAH ACADEMY FOR GIRLS
    3× · 2020–2022 · $42k
  • CZ
    CONGREGATION ZICHRON MOSHE INC
    2× · 2020–2023 · $33k

Funded once

  • KB
    KOLLEL BOKER ZICHRON MEIR MOSHE INC
    one grant, 2022 · $30k
  • CB
    CONGREGATION BNEI AHARON INC
    one grant, 2022 · $29k
  • CO
    CONGREGATION OHR MEIR
    one grant, 2021 · $18k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Zichron Moshe Elihu Tzedoka Fund
Philanthropy
2
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
3
Zichron Avrohom Yosef
Philanthropy
4
Tzemach Yifroch Foundation
—
5
Tal Hashamayim Foundation
Religion
6
The Etz Chaim Charitable Trust
Philanthropy
7
Yeshiva Toras Chaim of Greater Miami Inc

To operate a religious school for high school and post high school students.

Education
8
Zichron Chaim Avraham Foundation
Philanthropy
9
Zichron Boruch Tzvi Foundation
Philanthropy
10
Chasdei Hashem Foundation Trust
Philanthropy
11
Zichron Chaim Meir Foundation
Philanthropy
12
The Yad Moach Vlev Foundation
Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Rofeh Cholim Cancer Society Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Jtc Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 49 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/16
Grantees still filing
8/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

YESHIVA KETANA OF LONG ISLAND: $103,550 · OtherYESHIVA KETANA OF LONG ISLANDTORAH ACADEMY FOR GIRLS: $42,350 · OtherTORAH ACADEMY FOR GIRLSCONGREGATION ZICHRON MOSHE INC: $33,300 · OtherCONGREGATION ZICHRON MOSHE INCNER ISRAEL RABBINICAL COLLEGE INC: $33,200 · OtherNER ISRAEL RABBINICAL COLLEGE INCHEBREW ACADEMY OF LONG BEACH: $30,000 · OtherHEBREW ACADEMY OF LONG BEACHKOLLEL BOKER ZICHRON MEIR MOSHE INC: $29,680 · OtherKOLLEL BOKER ZICHRON MEIR MOSHE INCCONGREGATION BNEI AHARON INC: $29,400 · OtherCONGREGATION BNEI AHARON INCMISCELLANEOUS: $27,357 · OtherMISCELLANEOUSYESHIVA PEER HATORAH: $20,000 · OtherUNION OF ORTHODOX JEWISH CONG: $20,000 · OtherCONGREGATION OHR MEIR: $18,000 · Other+23 more: $86,310 · Other+23 moreCHAI LIFELINE INC: $15,000 · HealthGREAT GRAND NACHAS AND MORE INC: $2,700 · HealthPROJECT YECHI INC: $1,800 · HealthA Torah Infertilty Medium Exchange: $13,960 · Human ServicesBAIS ELUZER FUND: $3,580 · Human ServicesDAVIS MEMORIAL FUND INC: $1,200 · Human ServicesYESHIVA NETZACH HATORAH INC: $5,000 · ReligionYESHIVA NISHMAS HATORAH INC: $500 · ReligionGOFUNDMEORG: $2,300 · PhilanthropyTHE JTC FOUNDATION: $1,000 · PhilanthropyROFEH CHOLIM CANCER SOCIETY INC: $1,000 · PhilanthropyTOURO UNIVERSITY: $1,500 · EducationFRIENDS OF KOLLEL DVAR ELYON INC: $1,000 · EducationTOMCHE SHABBOS OF ROCKLAND COUNTY INC: $1,800 · Food & NutritionANCHOR MENTORING INC: $1,800 · Youth Development
Other$473,147Health$19,500Human Services$18,740Religion$5,500Philanthropy$4,300Education$2,500Food & Nutrition$1,800Youth Development$1,800

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCHAI LIFELINE INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetA Torah Infertilty Medium Exchange: $13,960 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetBAIS ELUZER FUND: $3,580 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetGREAT GRAND NACHAS AND MORE INC: $2,700 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetGOFUNDMEORG: $2,300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAGUDATH ISRAEL OF AMERICA: $1,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTOMCHE SHABBOS OF ROCKLAND COUNTY INC: $1,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetANCHOR MENTORING INC: $1,800 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetPROJECT YECHI INC: $1,800 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTOURO UNIVERSITY: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDAVIS MEMORIAL FUND INC: $1,200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF KOLLEL DVAR ELYON INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE JTC FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 53% of budgetROFEH CHOLIM CANCER SOCIETY INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CHAI LIFELINE INC ↗
  • Who funds A Torah Infertilty Medium Exchange ↗
  • Who funds YESHIVA NETZACH HATORAH INC ↗
  • Who funds BAIS ELUZER FUND ↗
  • Who funds GREAT GRAND NACHAS AND MORE INC ↗
  • Who funds GOFUNDMEORG ↗
  • Who funds AGUDATH ISRAEL OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds TOMCHE SHABBOS OF ROCKLAND COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds ANCHOR MENTORING INC ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT YECHI INC ↗
  • Who funds TOURO UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds DAVIS MEMORIAL FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF KOLLEL DVAR ELYON INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ojc FundJewish Communal FundFjcAlyad Foundation IncJack Adjmi Family Fou…Dbay Family FoundationThe Wieder Family Fou…The Zev and Susan Mun…Zichron Yechiel Meche…Zichron Chaim Charity…Keren Zichron Aron Fo…Freund Family Foundat…
The Ojc FundNY31.7× affinity18 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · Jewish Communal Fund · Fjc · Alyad Foundation Inc · Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · Dbay Family Foundation · The Wieder Family Foundation Inc · The Zev and Susan Munk Family Foundation · Zichron Yechiel Mechel Foundation · Zichron Chaim Charity Fund · Keren Zichron Aron Foundation The · Freund Family Foundation The

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Rochelly Foundation The funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Rochelly Foundation The. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Rochelly Foundation The?

    Find your warmest path to Rochelly Foundation The through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 49 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Rochelly Foundation The’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home