Skip to content

· Private foundation

Robison Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$491k
Granted FY2025still arriving
50
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$60k
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$1.1MHealth$719kReligion$398kArts & Culture$260kHuman Services$162kHousing & Shelter$112kYouth Development$71kAnimals$70kOther$0
02FY2025 · 50 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 50 grants below total $475,500, the rows itemized in this filing. The $491,000 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $15,500 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k28 grants · $92k
  • $10k–50k20 grants · $267k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $117k
$5,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$4.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Emma Willard School$60,000
Albany Academy$56,500
Columbia University School of Nursing$25,000
Samaritan Hospital$24,000
St. Michael's Church$20,000
Cincinnati Salvation Army$15,000
Unity House$15,000
St. John's Episcopal Church$15,000
Children's Hospital Medical Center$15,000
Vanderhyden Hall (underprivileged children's home)$14,000
Christ Church$12,000
Special Camp for Kids$12,000
Boston College$10,000
Troy Savings Bank Music Hall$10,000
Hart Cluett Museum$10,000
02Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.0M · 71 repeat orgs$65k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +88% since the first grant, against +14% for those funded once.

71 repeat relationships: 47 still active in FY2025, 24 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

71
22

Total granted

$3.0M
$56k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+88%
+14%

Still filing today

8%
5%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $9k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EW
    EMMA WILLARD SCHOOL
    7× · 2017–2025 · $322k · revenue +88%
  • TA
    THE ALBANY ACADEMIES INC
    7× · 2017–2025 · $187k · revenue +16%
  • CH
    CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER
    7× · 2017–2025 · $165k · revenue +53%

Funded once

  • BS
    Boise State University Nursing School
    one grant, 2024 · $9k
  • AC
    ALBANY COLLEGE OF PHARMACY AND HEALTH SCIENCES
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue +14%
  • HM
    Hudson Mohawk Industnal Gateway
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

03Its field
03the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 96 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
7/7
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Northeast Health: $315,000 · OtherNortheast HealthTHE ALBANY ACADEMIES INC: $186,500 · OtherTHE ALBANY ACADEMIES INCSt John's Episcopal Church: $121,000 · OtherHaverford College: $110,000 · OtherUNITY HOUSE: $105,000 · OtherVanderhyden Hall (underprivileged children's home): $90,000 · Other+86 more: $1,606,250 · Other+86 moreEMMA WILLARD SCHOOL: $321,500 · EducationEMMA WILLARD …Bucknell University: $51,750 · EducationBucknell Univ…+1 more: $5,000 · EducationCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER: $165,000 · Health
Other$2,533,750Education$378,250Health$165,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetEMMA WILLARD SCHOOL: $321,500 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetTHE ALBANY ACADEMIES INC: $186,500 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER: $165,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTROY SAVINGS BANK MUSIC HALL CORPORATION: $56,500 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetBucknell University: $51,750 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetALBANY COLLEGE OF PHARMACY AND HEALTH SCIENCES: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds EMMA WILLARD SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds THE ALBANY ACADEMIES INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds TROY SAVINGS BANK MUSIC HALL CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds Bucknell University ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Ge Aerospace FoundationCT14.1× affinity5 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Ge Aerospace Foundation · The McCarthy Charities Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
04Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Robison Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Robison Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 96 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Robison Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph