· Private foundation
Robins Nest Family Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k18 grants · $68k
- $10k–50k13 grants · $172k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $59k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| EVERSTRONG | $59,000 |
| TEMPLE DE HIRSCH SINAI | $30,000 |
| YOUTHCARE | $20,000 |
| MULTICARE BEHAVIORAL HEALTH FOUNDATION | $17,000 |
| COLLEGE SUCCESS FOUNDATION | $15,000 |
| BROTHERS FOR LIFE | $10,000 |
| NATIONAL OUTDOOR LEADERSHIP SCHOOL | $10,000 |
| SAMUEL AND ALTHEA STROUM | $10,000 |
| LIFEWIRE | $10,000 |
| THE SOPHIA WAY | $10,000 |
| SAFE CROSSING FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| AMARA | $10,000 |
| JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE | $10,000 |
| YELLOWSTONE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| WELLSPRING FAMILY SERVICES | $7,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–25, $478k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 13% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +18% since the first grant, against +1% for the ones you funded once.
42 repeat relationships — 21 still active in FY2025, 21 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 68% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $95k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CSCollege Success Foundation5× · 2021–2025 · $90k · revenue +70%
- SCSAFE CROSSINGS FOUNDATION5× · 2021–2025 · $66k · revenue +37%
- JFJEWISH FAMILY SERVICES2× · 2022–2023 · $60k · revenue +80%
Funded once
- MPMARY'S PLACE SEATTLEone grant, 2020 · $20k · revenue +18%
- BBAMone grant, 2021 · $20k
- RNROBINS NEST EMPOWERMENT FUNDone grant, 2021 · $15k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Jewish family and children's service of minneapolis provides essential services to people of all ages and backgrounds to sustain healthy relationships, ease suffering and offer support in times of need.
Life science washington is a non-profit trade and professional association dedicated to promoting innovation and responsible growth in the life sciences and biomedical industries in the state of washington. promotion and education are…
KCSARC is the largest and most comprehensive non-profit provider of sexual assault services in King County and Washington State. Our vision is a community free of sexual violence. Our mission is to: give voice to victims, their families,…
Disability rights washington's mission is to advance the dignity, equality, and self determination of people with disabilities. we work to pursue justice on matters related to human and legal rights.
Seattle jobs initiative (sji) creates opportunities for people to support themselves and their families through living-wage careers.
Supporting industry transformation towards climate-positive and make green careers transitions and driving the adoption of green workforce development practices broadly.
To preserve and enhance the quality of life at home, with dignity and care.
Women donors network advances a just, equitable, and sustainable world through the power of philanthropy, women's leadership, and collective and individual action.
The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…
The jewish coalition builds a jewish voice in the pacific northwest advancing immigrant justice and domestic policy, following the leadership of impacted community.
We conduct fundamental infectious disease research to generate critical new knowledge about pathogens and their interactions with see schedule o for continuationhumans to enable the discovery and development of novel interventions,…
Siff is a seattle-based 501(c)(3) arts nonprofit dedicated to the creation of vibrant experiences and spaces that champion film discovery and arts education.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Multicare Foundations and the most unlike its peers is Seattle University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 4% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
65 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 65 of the 89 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Everstrong Prevention ↗
- Who funds YOUTHCARE ↗
- Who funds College Success Foundation ↗
- Who funds SAFE CROSSINGS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES ↗
- Who funds LifeWire ↗
- Who funds THE SOPHIA WAY ↗
- Who funds CODEORG ↗
- Who funds AMARA ↗
- Who funds Washington Women in Need ↗
- Who funds Brothers for Life ↗
- Who funds Maris Place ↗
- Who funds MULTICARE FOUNDATIONS ↗
- Who funds JUBILEE WOMEN'S CENTER ↗
- Who funds JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL OUTDOOR LEADERSHIP SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY CHILD DEVELOPMENT SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds LAMBERT HOUSE ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN - SEATTLE ↗
- Who funds MARY'S PLACE SEATTLE ↗
- Who funds NAVOS ↗
- Who funds YELLOWSTONE CLUB COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER ↗
- Who funds SEATTLE THEATRE GROUP ↗
- Who funds Friends of Cancer Research ↗
- Who funds You Grow Girl ↗
- Who funds GIFT OF LIFE MARROW REGISTRY INC ↗
- Who funds LIFE SCIENCE CARES INC ↗
- Who funds GENEROSITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds SOCIETY FOR IMMUNOTHERAPY OF CANCER INC ↗
- Who funds SEATTLE UNIVERSITY ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Seattle Foundation · Puget Sound Energy Foundation · United Way of King County · Moccasin Lake Foundation · McKinstry Charitable Foundation · The Norcliffe Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Medina Foundation · Lott Foundation · Satya and Rao Remala Foundation · Casey Family Programs · Mightycause Charitable Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Robins Nest Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Save the Children Federation Inc — 30% of income from government
- B'nai Brith Men's Camp Association — 7% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Robins Nest Family Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Robins Nest Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.