Skip to content

· Private foundation

Robinowitz-Brodsky Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$104k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Philanthropy$498kHealth$222kReligion$95kCivil Rights$61kHuman Services$36kRecreation & Sports$16kArts & Culture$14kInternational$11kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $44k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $60k
$5,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$2.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JUPITER MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION$30,000
JEWISH FEDERATION OF PALM BEACH$15,000
JEWISH FEDERATION OF TULSA$15,000
Individual grant recipient$7,500
ASCENSION SETON BREAST CENTER$5,000
BALLENISLES CHARITIES FOUNDATION INC$5,000
MANDEL JCC$5,000
SHALOM AUSTIN LION OF JUDAH$5,000
CONGREGATION B'NAI EMUNAH$4,133
LIFE WORKS$4,000
ADL$3,000
END VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN INTERNATIONAL$3,000
ISRAEL TENNIS CENTER FOUNDATION$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–25, $11k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%END VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN INTERNATIONAL: $5k → 13%END VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN INTERNATIONAL: $3k → 13%END VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN INTERNATIONAL: $3k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MN
NY
IN
CA
MD
DC
OK
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$463k · 19 repeat orgs$58k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +52% since the first grant, against +8% for those funded once.

19 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
6

Total granted

$463k
$47k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+52%
+8%

Still filing today

53%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $12k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthPhilanthropyCivil RightsArts & CultureReligionHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JM
    Jupiter Medical Center Foundation Inc
    8× · 2018–2025 · $135k · revenue +52%
  • THE FOUNDATION FIGHTING BLINDNESS INC
    7× · 2017–2023 · $62k · revenue +49%
  • BC
    BALLENISLES CHARITIES FOUNDATION INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $43k · revenue +76%

Funded once

  • MJ
    MANDEL JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF THE PALM BEACHES INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $36k · revenue +56%
  • PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue +8%
  • ZF
    ZTA FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2018 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Banner Alzheimer's Foundation

Established in 2006, the banner alzheimer's foundation (baf) secures and stewards charitable gifts to advance the mission of banner alzheimer's institute (bai), including groundbreaking research initiatives and pioneering prevention…

Health
2
Banner -University Medical Group

Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.

Health
3
Metropolitan Jewish Health System Inc

Mjhs health system is a charitable not-for-profit established to support the activities of affiliated organizations. mjhs is built on the core values of compassion, dignity and respect, first established by the four brooklyn ladies in…

Health
4
The University of TexasTexas a&M Investment Management Company

To generate superior long-term investment returns to support The University of Texas and Texas A&M University systems as they provide world-class teaching, push the boundaries of discovery, and achieve excellence in patient healthcare for…

Education
5
Aclu Foundation of Texas Inc

The ACLU Foundation of Texas is the unyielding guardian and promoter of freedom, justice, equality and dignity of all people, particularly for those who are still fighting to secure the full exercise of their civil rights and liberties.…

Civil Rights
6
American Medical Association Foundation

The ama foundation brings together physicians and communities to improve our nation's health.

—
7
Jewelers of America Inc

Jewelers of america, the most trusted and influential voice of the jewelry industry, empowers and unites its members through expert guidance and advocacy, driving excellence, integrity, and success in an ever-changing marketplace.

—
8
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
9
Tampa Bay Partnership Inc

The tampa bay partnership is a privately funded, ceo-driven regional advocacy organization, committed to creating a unified, competitive and prosperous tampa bay.

—
10
Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America

Phrma's mission is to conduct effective advocacy for public policies that encourage the discovery of important, new medicines for patients by biopharmaceutical research companies.

—
11
Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations

Joint Commission evaluates and accredits health care organizations and programs across the United States to ensure compliance with rigorous standards of quality and safety, including the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS)…

Health
12
Jewish Federation Council of Greater La

Based on jewish values, the jewish federation of greater los angeles convenes and leads the community and leverages its resources to assure the continuity of the jewish people, support a secure state of israel, care for jews in need here…

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Federation of Palm Beach County Inc; the most unlike its peers is End Violence Against Women International (Evawi). Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/17
Grantees still filing
14/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

JEWISH FEDERATION OF PALM BEACH COUNTY INC: $242,000 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FEDERATION OF PALM BEACH COUNTY INCJEWISH FEDERATION OF TULSA: $205,000 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FEDERATION OF TULSAJupiter Medical Center Foundation Inc: $135,000 · PhilanthropyJupiter Medical Center Foundation IncBALLENISLES CHARITIES FOUNDATION INC: $42,500 · PhilanthropyBALLENISLES CHARITIES FOUNDATION INCHRC FOUNDATION: $40,000 · OtherHRC FOUNDATIONMANDEL JCC: $37,500 · OtherMANDEL JCCCONGREGATION B'NAI EMUNAH: $37,197 · OtherCONGREGATION B'NAI EMUN…SHALOM AUSTIN LION OF JUDAH: $20,000 · OtherSHALOM AUSTIN LION OF J…ASCENSION SETON BREAST CENTER: $15,000 · OtherASCENSION SETON BREAST …ISRAEL TENNIS CENTER FOUNDATION: $13,000 · OtherISRAEL TENNIS CENTER FO…TULSA AREA UNITED WAY: $8,250 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $7,500 · OtherSHERWIN MILLER MUSEUM OF ART: $7,250 · Other+5 more: $14,400 · Other+5 moreTHE FOUNDATION FIGHTING BLINDNESS INC: $61,500 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $5,000 · Health+2 more: $2,000 · HealthMANDEL JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF THE PALM BEACHES INC: $36,000 · ReligionEQTX Equality Texas Foundation: $13,000 · Civil RightsLAMBDA LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUCATION FUND INC: $7,500 · Civil RightsEND VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN INTERNATIONAL (EVAWI): $10,500 · Human ServicesRAYMOND F KRAVIS CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS INC: $5,850 · Arts & CultureNORTON MUSEUM OF ART INC: $588 · Arts & CultureHEALTHY BRAINS GLOBAL INITIATIVE INC: $2,000 · Science & Tech
Philanthropy$624,500Other$200,097Health$68,500Religion$36,000Civil Rights$20,500Human Services$10,500Arts & Culture$6,438Science & Tech$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF PALM BEACH COUNTY INC: $242,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF TULSA: $205,000 over 8y, 1.4% of budgetJupiter Medical Center Foundation Inc: $135,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetTHE FOUNDATION FIGHTING BLINDNESS INC: $61,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetBALLENISLES CHARITIES FOUNDATION INC: $42,500 over 9y, 0.5% of budgetMANDEL JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF THE PALM BEACHES INC: $36,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetEQTX Equality Texas Foundation: $13,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetEND VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN INTERNATIONAL (EVAWI): $10,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetTULSA AREA UNITED WAY: $8,250 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetLAMBDA LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUCATION FUND INC: $7,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRAYMOND F KRAVIS CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS INC: $5,850 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHEALTHY BRAINS GLOBAL INITIATIVE INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetRECOVERYPEOPLE: $1,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetTexas Mamma Jamma Ride Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetNORTON MUSEUM OF ART INC: $588 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAUSTIN RECOVERY INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF PALM BEACH COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF TULSA ↗
  • Who funds Jupiter Medical Center Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE FOUNDATION FIGHTING BLINDNESS INC ↗
  • Who funds BALLENISLES CHARITIES FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MANDEL JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF THE PALM BEACHES INC ↗
  • Who funds EQTX Equality Texas Foundation ↗
  • Who funds END VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN INTERNATIONAL (EVAWI) ↗
  • Who funds TULSA AREA UNITED WAY ↗
  • Who funds LAMBDA LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUCATION FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds RAYMOND F KRAVIS CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS INC ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds HEALTHY BRAINS GLOBAL INITIATIVE INC ↗
  • Who funds RECOVERYPEOPLE ↗
  • Who funds Texas Mamma Jamma Ride Inc ↗
  • Who funds NORTON MUSEUM OF ART INC ↗
  • Who funds AUSTIN RECOVERY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Bank of America Charitable Foundation IncNC8.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Robinowitz-Brodsky Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Robinowitz-Brodsky Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    5get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Robinowitz-Brodsky’s filings →

    More from the funding graph