Skip to content

· Private foundation

Robertson Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$94k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$862kHealth$462kEducation$413kSocial Science$105kHuman Services$68kInternational$55kCommunity Improvement$49kAnimals$31kOther$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $24k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $70k
$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$5.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST WENCESLAUS CATHOLIC CHURCH$25,000
MARIAN HIGH SCHOOL$15,235
CUES SCHOOL SYSTEM$10,000
PLATTE INSTITUTE FOR ECONOMIC RESEARCH$10,000
CREIGHTON UNIVERSITY$10,000
AUTISM ACTION PARTNERSHIP$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION$5,000
INSTITUTE OF PRIESTLY FORMATION$5,000
SUNSHINE KIDS$2,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
PARKINSON'S NEBRASKA$600
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $69k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%KNIGHTS OF AK-SAR-BEN FOUNDATION: $25k → 12%KNIGHTS OF AK-SAR-BEN FOUNDATION: $24k → 12%OPEN DOOR MISSION: $10k → 12%OPEN DOOR MISSION: $10k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MT
IL
NY
MA
IA
NJ
CO
NE
MO
VA
MD
NC
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.7M · 27 repeat orgs$400k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +43% since the first grant, against +39% for those funded once.

27 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 20 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

27
38

Total granted

$1.7M
$362k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+43%
+39%

Still filing today

48%
47%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 59% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $39k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationHuman ServicesReligionPhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AA
    AUTISM ACTION PARTNERSHIP
    9× · 2017–2025 · $413k · revenue +146%
  • CU
    Creighton University
    6× · 2017–2025 · $105k · revenue +48%
  • PI
    PLATTE INSTITUTE FOR ECONOMIC RESEARCH INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $105k · revenue +29%

Funded once

  • TS
    THE SEMINAR NETWORK INC
    one grant, 2024 · $92k · revenue 0%
  • AA
    ARCHBISHOP'S ANNUAL APPEAL
    one grant, 2023 · $50k
  • SP
    SAMARITAN'S PURSEgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $45k · revenue +53%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Stand for Schools

Stand for schools supports nebraska's public schools, working to advance policies that make them stronger while opposing policies that would weaken them.

Education
2
Share Omaha

Our mission is to help nonprofits fulfill theirs.

Philanthropy
3
Children's Physicians

Children's physicians delivers the highest quality pediatric primary care while supporting education and research.

Health
4
Nebraska Pediatric Practice Inc

Provides a means whereby the resources, expertise, and knowledge of the pediatric specialty physicians can be marshaled to develop, promote, and make available to patients from omaha, ne and the surrounding area, pediatric, academic, and…

Health
5
Omaha Bridges Out of Poverty Inc

Empowering under-resourced families to change their lives by discovering and overcoming barriers to success.

Human Services
6
Catholic Charities Foundation

Support the mission and social services programs of catholic charities of the archdiocese of omaha, inc.

Religion
7
The Human Choice of Iowa

Mission is to provide women facing an unplanned pregnancy with truthful medical information and education. we are faith-based with a mission to encourage, through education and outreach, the recognition of human life from the moment of…

Human Services
8
Educationquest Foundation Inc

Improve access to higher education in nebraska.

Education
9
Council of Independent Nebraska Colleges Foundation

The council of indepependent nebraska colleges foundation exists to provide operating funds and scholarship support for students attending nebraska's independent institutions of excellence.

—
10
One Omaha

One omaha empowers people where they live with education, training, and engagement to develop thriving neighborhoods.

Community Improvement
11
Nebraska Alliance of Child Advocacy Centers

To enhance nebraska's response to child abuse.

Crime & Legal
12
Nebraska Community Foundation

The nebraska community foundation unleashes abundant local assets, inspires charitable giving, and connects ambitious people to build stronger communities and a greater nebraska.

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Knights of Ak-Sar-Ben Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Samaritan's Purse. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

32 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 32 of the 70 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
32/32
Grantees still filing
23/32
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST WENCESLAUS PARISH: $380,269 · OtherST WENCESLAUS PARISHARCHDIOCESE OF OMAHA: $148,407 · OtherARCHDIOCESE OF OMAHAARCHBISHOP'S DINNER FOR EDUCATION: $100,000 · OtherARCHBISHOP'S DINNER FOR EDUCATIONIndividual grant recipient: $74,996 · OtherIndividual grant recipientARCHBISHOP'S ANNUAL APPEAL: $50,000 · Other+50 more: $399,885 · Other+50 moreAUTISM ACTION PARTNERSHIP: $413,254 · PhilanthropyAUTISM ACTION PARTNERS…+1 more: $10,000 · PhilanthropyCreighton University: $105,024 · EducationCreighton Univ…THE SEMINAR NETWORK INC: $91,860 · EducationTHE SEMINAR NE…CHILDREN'S SCHOLARSHIP FUND OF OMAHA: $35,000 · EducationCHILDREN'S SCH…UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION: $30,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF …+1 more: $2,000 · EducationPLATTE INSTITUTE FOR ECONOMIC RESEARCH INC: $104,765 · Social ScienceSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $45,172 · ReligionVSS CATHOLIC COMMUNICATIONS INC: $25,000 · ReligionAlpha USA: $20,000 · ReligionKNIGHTS OF AK-SAR-BEN FOUNDATION: $48,840 · Human ServicesOPEN DOOR MISSION D/B/A OPEN DOOR MISSION & LYDIA HOUSE: $20,000 · Human ServicesCHRIST CHILD SOCIETY OF OMAHA NEBRASKA: $3,000 · Human ServicesRETRIEVING FREEDOM INC: $21,000 · Animals
Other$1,153,557Philanthropy$423,254Education$263,884Social Science$104,765Religion$90,172Human Services$71,840Animals$21,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAUTISM ACTION PARTNERSHIP: $413,254 over 9y, 8.8% of budgetCreighton University: $105,024 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetPLATTE INSTITUTE FOR ECONOMIC RESEARCH INC: $104,765 over 9y, 1.8% of budgetTHE SEMINAR NETWORK INC: $91,860 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetKNIGHTS OF AK-SAR-BEN FOUNDATION: $48,840 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $45,172 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S SCHOLARSHIP FUND OF OMAHA: $35,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION: $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetVSS CATHOLIC COMMUNICATIONS INC: $25,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetRETRIEVING FREEDOM INC: $21,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetOPEN DOOR MISSION D/B/A OPEN DOOR MISSION & LYDIA HOUSE: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAlpha USA: $20,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetNEBRASKA FAMILY ALLIANCE INC: $20,000 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetFOOD BANK FOR THE HEARTLAND: $15,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL FOREST FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEDUCATE UGANDA: $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetMATER FILIUS OF NEBRASKA INC: $10,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetAssure Womens Center: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCOMPLETELY KIDS: $7,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHRIST CHILD SOCIETY OF OMAHA NEBRASKA: $3,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetSTUTTERING ASSOCIATION FOR THE YOUNG INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget100 BLACK MEN OF OMAHA INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetHOPE CENTER FOR KIDS INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetARTHRITIS FOUNDATION INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTURNING POINT USA INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHICANO AWARENESS CENTER INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMULTIPLE SCLEROSIS ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECT HARMONY: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF OMAHA INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCity of Omaha Police Foundation Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AUTISM ACTION PARTNERSHIP ↗
  • Who funds Creighton University ↗
  • Who funds PLATTE INSTITUTE FOR ECONOMIC RESEARCH INC ↗
  • Who funds THE SEMINAR NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds KNIGHTS OF AK-SAR-BEN FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S SCHOLARSHIP FUND OF OMAHA ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds VSS CATHOLIC COMMUNICATIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds RETRIEVING FREEDOM INC ↗
  • Who funds OPEN DOOR MISSION D/B/A OPEN DOOR MISSION & LYDIA HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds Alpha USA ↗
  • Who funds NEBRASKA FAMILY ALLIANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds FOOD BANK FOR THE HEARTLAND ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL FOREST FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds EDUCATE UGANDA ↗
  • Who funds MATER FILIUS OF NEBRASKA INC ↗
  • Who funds Assure Womens Center ↗
  • Who funds COMPLETELY KIDS ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Charles and Mary Heider Family FoundationNE28.3× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Charles and Mary Heider Family Foundation · Seline Family Foundation · The Lozier Foundation · Nebraska Community Foundation · Suzanne & Walter Scott Foundation · Robert B Daugherty Foundation · Alan & Marcia Baer Foundation · The Dorothy B Davis Foundation · Cl Werner Foundation · The Holland Foundation · Mutual of Omaha Foundation · The Hawks Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Robertson Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Robertson Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Robertson Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Robertson Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 70 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Robertson Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph